Vet Pathol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiupel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiupel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Vet Pathol 41:371-377 (2004)
© 2004 American College of Veterinary Pathologists

The Use of KIT and Tryptase Expression Patterns as Prognostic Tools for Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors

M. Kiupel, J. D. Webster, J. B. Kaneene, R. Miller and V. Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan

Comparative Medicine and Integrative Biology (JDW), Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation (JDW, MK), The Population Medicine Center (JBK, RM), and Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences (VY-G), College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

Cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCTs) are one of the most common tumors in dogs. Currently, prognostic and therapeutic determinations for MCTs are primarily based on the histologic grade of the tumor, but a vast majority of MCTs are of an intermediate grade, and the prognostic relevance is highly questioned. A more detailed prognostic evaluation, especially of grade 2 canine MCTs, is greatly needed. To evaluate the prognostic significance of KIT and tryptase expression patterns in canine cutaneous MCTs, we studied 100 cutaneous MCTs from 100 dogs that had been treated with surgery only. The total survival and disease-free survival time and the time to local or distant recurrence of MCTs were recorded for all dogs. Using immunohistochemistry, 98 of these MCTs were stained with anti-KIT and antitryptase antibodies. Three KIT- and three tryptase-staining patterns were identified. The KIT-staining patterns were identified as 1) membrane-associated staining, 2) focal to stippled cytoplasmic staining with decreased membrane-associated staining, and 3) diffuse cytoplasmic staining. The tryptase-staining patterns were identified as 1) diffuse cytoplasmic staining, 2) stippled cytoplasmic staining, and 3) little to no cytoplasmic staining. Based on univariate and multivariate survival analysis, increased cytoplasmic KIT staining was significantly associated with an increased rate of local recurrence and a decreased survival rate. The tryptase-staining patterns were not significantly associated with any survival parameter. On the basis of these results, we propose a new prognostic classification of canine cutaneous MCTs, according to their KIT-staining pattern, that can be used for the routine prognostic evaluation of canine cutaneous MCTs.


Key words: Canine mast cell tumors; c-kit; KIT; MCT; tryptase.

Request reprints from Dr. M. Kiupel, Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health, Michigan State University, G300 VMC, East Lansing, MI 48824 (USA). E-mail: kiupel{at}dcpah.msu.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvdiHome page
X. J. He, K. Uchida, T. Tochitani, K. Uetsuka, Y. Miwa, and H. Nakayama
Spontaneous cutaneous mast cell tumor with lymph node metastasis in a Richardson's ground squirrel (Spermophilus richardsonii)
J Vet Diagn Invest, January 1, 2009; 21(1): 156 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvdiHome page
J. A. Ramos-Vara, M. Kiupel, T. Baszler, L. Bliven, B. Brodersen, B. Chelack, S. Czub, F. D. Piero, S. Dial, E.J. Ehrhart, et al.
Suggested guidelines for immunohistochemical techniques in veterinary diagnostic laboratories
J Vet Diagn Invest, July 1, 2008; 20(4): 393 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
J. D. Webster, V. Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, R. A. Miller, J. B. Kaneene, and M. Kiupel
Cellular Proliferation in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors: Associations with c-KIT and Its Role in Prognostication
Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2007; 44(3): 298 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
E. M. Romansik, C. M. Reilly, P. H. Kass, P. F. Moore, and C. A. London
Mitotic Index Is Predictive for Survival for Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors
Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2007; 44(3): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
F. Seeliger, O. Hess, M. Probsting, S. Kleinschmidt, T. Woehrmann, P. G. Germann, and W. Baumgartner
Confocal Laser Scanning Analysis of an Equine Oral Mast Cell Tumor with Atypical Expression of Tyrosine Kinase Receptor C-KIT
Vet. Pathol., March 1, 2007; 44(2): 225 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
L. R. Bartner, N. E. Robinson, M. Kiupel, and Y. Tesfaigzi
Persistent mucus accumulation: a consequence of delayed bronchial mucous cell apoptosis in RAO-affected horses?
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): L602 - L609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
J. S. Munday, M. M. Brennan, and M. Kiupel
Altered Expression of {beta}-catenin, E-cadherin, Cycloxygenase-2, and p53 Protein by Ovine Intestinal Adenocarcinoma Cells.
Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2006; 43(5): 613 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists.