Vet Pathol Download to Citation Manager
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luong, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bergman, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luong, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bergman, P. J.
Vet Pathol 43:622-631 (2006)
© 2006 American College of Veterinary Pathologists

Prognostic Significance of Intratumoral Microvessel Density in Canine Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

R. H. Luong, K. E. Baer, D. M. Craft, S. N. Ettinger, T. J. Scase and P. J. Bergman

Department of Pathology, (RHL, KEB, TJS), Flaherty Comparative Oncology Laboratory, (DMC, PJB), and TheDonaldson-Atwood Cancer Clinic(SNE, PJB), The Animal Medical New York, NY.

The prognosis of canine soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) has traditionally been based on histologic grading. We have recently demonstrated the prognostic value of cellular proliferation markers in canine STS. Another method of predicting the behavior of neoplasms is intratumoral microvessel density (IMD), which is a measure of tumor angiogenesis. The prognostic significance of IMD has been documented in many human neoplasms and in a limited number of canine and feline neoplasms. To evaluate the prognostic value of IMD in canine STS, we studied 57 STS and compared IMD with histologic features, histologic grade, cellular proliferation, metastatic propensity, and survival. Using immunohistochemistry, the STS were labeled with anti–factor VIII–related antigen (FVIII-RA) and anti-CD31 antibodies to determine 3 IMD parameters: mean microvessel density, high microvessel density, and microvessel area. Using FVIII-RA and CD31, increasing IMD was statistically associated with increasing histologic grade, necrosis scores, and mitotic scores. Higher FVIII-RA IMD values were significantly associated with higher median argyrophilic nucleolar organizing region (AgNOR) values (as previously investigated) and increased metastatic propensity. Fibrosarcomas appear to be the least vascularized of STS. There is no correlation between IMD and survival. Our results indicate that IMD is of prognostic value for histologic grade, histologic features, cellular proliferation (based on AgNOR), and metastatic propensity of canine STS, specifically when using FVIII-RA as the endothelial marker. Assessing histologic grading, cellular proliferation, and IMD of canine STS at the time of diagnosis could therefore provide better prognostic information for the veterinary clinician.

Key words: Angiogenesis; canine; CD31; FVIII-RA; intratumoral microvessel density; prognosis; soft-tissue sarcomas.

Request reprints from  Dr. Richard Luong, Department of Pathology, The Animal Medical Center, 510 East 62nd Street, New York, NY 10021 (USA). E-mail: richard.luong{at}amcny.org






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists.