This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, S. H. Articles by McManus, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, S. H. Articles by McManus, P. M. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

A Comparative Review of Melanocytic Neoplasms

Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 
Melanoma is a devastating disease frequently encountered within both veterinary and human medicine. Molecular changes linked with neoplastic transformation of melanocytes include mutations in genes that encode proteins intrinsic to the regulatory pathways of two tumor suppressor proteins (retinoblastoma protein and p53), proto-oncogene mutation to oncogenes, altered expression of epithelial cadherin and CD44 adhesion molecules, and upregulation of angiogenic factors and other growth factors. Histologic evaluation of the primary mass is the most common means of diagnosis, with cytology used more frequently to document metastasis. Melanoma's highly variable histologic and cytologic patterns can make diagnosis by either method problematic. Adherent epithelioid morphology, including signet ring forms, and nonadherent round and spindle forms are recognized, with pigmentation an inconsistent finding. The site of the tumor, the thickness of the primary tumor or depth of invasion, and the number of mitotic figures per high-power field or per millimeter are used histologically to predict biologic behavior, whereas site and degree of pleomorphism are typically used for cytologic preparations. Diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma can be aided by ancillary diagnostic techniques. Tumor cells are usually positive for vimentin, S100, neuron-specific enolase, and Melan-A, and negative for cytokeratin. Melan-A as a positive marker is not as sensitive as the others are but is likely more specific. Monoclonal antibodies to human melanosome–specific antigens 1 and 5 cross-react with canine antigens for a combined sensitivity rate of 83%. Mouse monoclonal antibody IBF9 specifically recognizes canine melanoma antigen and also has good sensitivity. Serologic markers, including cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, and melanoma-inhibitory activity, are being investigated as potential sentinels of melanoma. Currently, there is no single diagnostic technique capable of differentiating benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms or predicting survival time.

Key words: Animal; cytology; melanoma; mouth neoplasms; pathology; review; skin neoplasms.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 
A diagnosis of melanoma in domestic animals typically carries a grave prognosis. It is generally detected at a late stage when excision is rarely curative and metastasis is often already detectable within regional lymph nodes (LN). In dogs it is a common diagnosis, accounting for 7% of all malignant tumors.⁵⁰ It is the most common malignant neoplasm of the oral cavity and the second most frequent subungual neoplasm.¹⁴⁸ In cats it is not as common but carries the same poor prognosis. In gray horses melanoma is so common as to be considered almost inevitable.¹⁵⁰ In humans the cutaneous form of melanoma is expected to reach an incidence of 1 in 75 among individuals born in the year 2000.² Although oral melanoma is not common in humans, accounting for only 1–2% of all melanomas, as in domestic animals, it is generally very advanced when detected and has only a 5% 5-year survival rate.²⁰³

The purpose of this review is to provide a reference for diagnosticians and a resource for scientists in the field of melanoma research. Regardless of whether the neoplasm is initiated by chemical carcinogens or ultraviolet (UV) light, melanomas in all species share a similar biology in that they frequently recur and are predisposed to metastasis to regional LN. Animal melanomas are common and provide a useful model for a deadly human disease.¹⁴⁵

Terminology for this disease is not consistent in human and veterinary literature. To avoid confusion in terminology in this article and to seek a common ground for both groups of readers, we use the term "melanoma" for all malignant melanocytic tumors, whereas melanocytoma refers to benign forms.

	Pathogenesis

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 
Normal melanocytes are dendritic cells derived from neuroectodermal melanoblasts that have migrated during embryogenesis to the epidermis, dermis, and other sites. They are found within the basal layer of the epidermis interspersed between basal keratinocytes. They normally do not form attachments with or even touch each other but rather form adherent and regulatory junctions with five to eight neighboring keratinocytes via epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) molecules.¹³⁸ Melanin is not retained within the normal melanocyte. It is packaged in melanosomes and transferred through their dendritic processes to keratinocytes. Conversion of normal melanocytes, that are nonpigmented and isolated from other melanocytes, to pigmented and clustered neoplastic melanocytes is a multistep process, with initiation as the first event, to be followed by promotion, transformation, and metastasis.^33,152,249

Virtually nothing is known about initiation of most animal melanomas, but initiation of as many as 65% of cutaneous melanomas in humans and in most of the melanomas diagnosed in Angora goats is thought to occur secondary to mutations generated by both UVA and UVB solar radiation.^96,180,218 This conclusion is based on epidemiologic linkage of melanoma with sun exposure by latitude and skin type (fair skin, freckling, and inability to tan). Furthermore, patients with the genetic disorder xeroderma pigmentosum, who have a defect in the enzymes required to repair light-induced DNA mutations (pyrimidine dimers), have a 1,000- to 2,000-fold increase in risk of developing skin cancer, including melanomas, squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and basal cell carcinomas.²⁴⁴ The initiators for all other cutaneous and noncutaneous melanomas are not known. Breed and familial clustering in domestic animals suggest that genetic susceptibility, possibly resulting in a greater frequency of spontaneously mutated cells, may be critical to initiation of many of these tumors.^{48,86,89,99,100}

In humans initiation within benign, pigmented precursor lesions contributes to a small percentage of melanoma cases.¹²⁷ The most important category of precursor lesion is the dysplastic nevus.¹²⁷ Multiple dysplastic nevi on an individual are associated with an increased risk of melanoma.¹⁹⁵ Other precursor lesions in humans include the giant congenital melanocytic nevus,¹²⁷ but only a single case of malignant transformation of a similar congenital lesion in a golden retriever has been reported.²⁴² Conroy⁴⁸ described two canine cases of melanoma that arose from junctional or dermal pigmented nevi (hamartomas), although in neither case was metastatic behavior observed. There is a single report of a primary melanoma in the skin of a dog that originated from a subcutaneous melanocytoma.¹⁶⁶ Melanoma has been reported to arise from primary acquired melanosis (PAM) in a dog's cornea and conjunctiva.⁵³ In humans approximately 46% of PAMs that demonstrate cellular atypia progress to melanoma.¹¹⁸ In general, however, with the exception of gray horses, malignant transformation of benign lesions is very uncommon in animals, and most melanomas are believed to arise de novo from melanocytes in the epidermis, dermis, ocular epithelium, and oral epithelium.⁴⁸

The next step in carcinogenesis requires a promoting factor(s). Promoters, possibly acting in an epigenetic fashion by disrupting gap-junctional intercellular communication, stimulate proliferation of the mutated cell, allowing for amplification of the cell population, persistence of the mutation, and opportunities for additional mutations.²³³ Promoters can include chronic trauma, chemical exposure, burns, hormones, infections, drugs, and other causes for reactive hyperplasia.^{33,38,119,233} Perhaps mucosal melanoma arises as a result of chronic injury (either mechanical or inflammatory) that results in reactive hyperplasia of the epithelium, disruption of normal keratinocyte-melanocyte interactions, and amplification of cells initiated spontaneously or by unidentified environmental factors.

Genetically or environmentally initiated DNA instability facilitates subsequent neoplastic transformation. Normal suppressors of cell proliferation and activators of apoptosis, e.g., retinoblastoma protein (Rb) and p53, are eventually superceded by unregulated growth factors or growth factor receptors (or both), and inhibitors of apoptosis, e.g., bcl-2.^160–162 For example, p53-triggered cell cycle arrest or apoptosis prevents maintenance of DNA mutations in any given cell line. Mutations in p53 (gene for a protein is italicized by convention) can prevent synthesis of p53 or result in abnormal p53 that cannot gain entry to the nucleus, resulting in perpetuation of a DNA mutation. Human melanomas with p53 expression are common, 20–40% among all cases, and may have a different pathogenesis compared with those without p53.²⁵¹ A canine case of multicentric melanocytoma was demonstrated to lack p53.¹⁹⁶ Conversely, overexpression of normal p53 was detected in metastatic melanomas in two horses, suggesting to those authors that p53 is not involved in equine melanoma tumorigenesis.²⁰²

Most melanoma cases in humans lack detectable p53 mutations. Mutations in INK4a, INK4b, and Waf-1 are more common.^160,231 INK4a and INK4b encode proteins p16^INK4a and p15^INK4b that are cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKI) regulated by Rb. Entry into mitosis is triggered by cyclin-dependent kinases; therefore, INK4a and INK4b mutations ultimately remove the ability to inhibit mitosis and allow uncontrolled proliferation. INK4a also encodes p19^ARF, which is an activator of p53, via an alternative exon and reading frame. Waf-1 encodes the protein p21, another CDKI. Expression of Waf-1 is partially regulated by p53. The multicentric melanocytoma case described above lacked functional p21.¹⁹⁶ Thus, activities of two important tumor suppressors, p53 and Rb, are essentially sabotaged in the majority of melanoma by mutations in genes that encode proteins intrinsic to these regulatory pathways.²³¹

Expression of the apoptosis suppressor gene bcl-2 was detected in 16 of 18 human cutaneous melanomas examined by Morales-Ducret et al. 1995,¹⁶² but the bcl-2 gene product was also found in resting melanocytes in normal skin. On the other hand, atypical bcl-2 overexpression has been detected in human uveal melanoma.²⁸ Suppression of apoptosis complements disruption of the Rb and p53 pathways to favor uncontrolled proliferation.

Proto-oncogene mutation to oncogenes also favors proliferation and tumor development. Oncogenes detected in in vitro and in vivo melanoma studies include c-myc, c-erb-B-2, c-yes, c-kit, and ras.^12,142,160

Autonomous growth is an additional requirement for neoplastic progression. The chief autocrine growth factors linked with melanoma development are basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), melanoma growth stimulatory activity or growth regulated proteins, interleukin (IL)-8, IL-10, IL-18, platelet-derived growth factor-A, and -melanocyte stimulating hormone.^{115,134,151,245} Late-stage melanomas are also stimulated by factors such as IL-6 and tumor growth factor-ß that are normally inhibitory to melanocyte proliferation.¹³⁴

Neoplastic transformation, resulting from mutations as described above, occurs before metastasis. Metastasis itself is a multistep process starting with detachment from the primary mass, movement to and through endothelium, travel via blood or lymph (or both), adhesion and movement through endothelium, and finally attachment and proliferation within a secondary site. Neoplastic cells must downregulate and then upregulate various adhesion molecules, e.g., Ca²⁺-dependent adherent molecules (cadherins) and CD44. Many studies have demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo decreases in E-cadherin in melanoma cells, which is supportive of theories that diminished E-cadherin interactions with basal keratinocytes are critical to melanoma tumorigenesis.^113,152 But inconsistent decreases in membranous E-cadherin, concurrent with dramatic decreases in membranous placental cadherin and it's associated gamma catenin in late-stage primary and metastatic melanoma tumors have been reported by others.²⁰⁸

The adhesion molecule CD44 most likely plays a role in the facilitation of melanoma metastasis. CD44 is a widely expressed transmembrane glycoprotein that functions in T-cell activation, T-cell extravasation, LN homing, hyaluronate degradation, cell aggregation and migration, angiogenesis, and hematopoiesis.^91,219 CD44 interacts with hyaluronic acid to facilitate expansion of proliferating tissues. Reduced expression of standard CD44 and upregulation of CD44 variant number 5 (CD44v5) has been demonstrated to occur in melanoma metastatic to LN.^205,215 Melanoma metastasis, but not primary growth, was inhibited by antibody to CD44 in SCID mice injected with the human melanoma cell line SmelanomaU-2.¹⁰³

At both primary and metastatic locations, angiogenesis is critical to survival and growth of any neoplasm regardless of its derivation. Reports on microvascularity of melanoma and its relationship with tumor aggression are inconsistent but seem to favor the theory that angiogenesis is critical to the metastatic potential of melanoma and correlates with poor outcome.^139,165,172 One recent study examined serum concentrations of four angiogenic factors for a possible correlation with tumor progression and survival.²⁴⁰ Serum levels of angiogenin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), bFGF, and IL-8 were all significantly elevated in melanoma patients compared with healthy controls; however, only elevated levels of VEGF, bFGF, and IL-8, and not angiogenin, had a positive correlation with poor survival and tumor burden.

During this entire process tumor cells must escape immune surveillance, be physically able to survive and move within the circulatory or lymphatic system (or both), and be able to proliferate within a stromal environment different from their origin. One current theory suggests that avoidance of the immune system is facilitated by tumor production of IL-10.¹¹⁵

Other changes required of a melanocyte to become malignant are the subject of considerable research.²¹⁸ Evaluations of cultured melanoma lines, animal models, and clinical cases are helping in answering questions regarding both general tumor biology and melanoma pathogenesis.

	Clinical Features

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 
Canine

Melanoma is relatively common in dogs, accounting for 3% of all neoplasms and up to 7% of all malignant tumors.⁵⁰ The most frequently affected sites are the oral cavity (56%), lip (23%), skin (11%), and digit (8%), with other sites, including the eye, accounting for only 2%.⁹⁰

Melanocytic neoplasms that arise in the oral cavity are virtually always considered malignant²⁶ and constitute the most common oral malignant neoplasm (Fig. 1).^26,232 They predominantly arise in the gingiva¹⁷⁵ and account for 33% of malignant neoplasms in this site,^{25,31,64,93,108} with fewer cases arising from the lingual, buccal, pharyngeal, tonsillar, and palatine epithelium. Oral melanomas grow rapidly, are invasive, and often recur after surgical resection. Presenting signs include dysphagia, halitosis, ptyalism, bleeding, and occasionally fracture of the mandible.^86,190 Seventy to ninety percent metastasize,^32,42,232 independent of location within the oral cavity.¹⁷ The most common metastatic sites are the regional LN, lung and viscera, including the heart (Figs. 2, 3).^48,232

View larger version (120K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Oral melanoma. Canine. Nonpigmented, exophytic mass protruding from the hard palate. Formalin-fixed tissue.

View larger version (65K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Metastatic melanoma. Canine. Multiple, black, raised, smooth, shiny nodules disseminated throughout the thoracic viscera, effacing the lungs, pericardium, and mediastinal soft tissue. Fig. 3. Metastatic melanoma. Canine. Multiple, black, raised, smooth, shiny nodules disseminated throughout the liver.

Subungual melanoma is the second most common digital neoplasm after SCC.¹⁴⁸ Digits affected by subungual melanoma often have deformed nails, growth of a mass from the nailbed, or paronychia (Fig. 4). Subungual melanoma can result in destruction of phalangeal bone(s)⁷ but less commonly (5%) than in cases of subungual SCC (80%).¹⁴⁸ Marino et al.¹⁴⁸ reported radiographic evidence of metastasis in 58% of digital melanoma, either before or soon after surgery, and a median survival time of 12 months.

View larger version (159K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Digital melanoma. Canine. Subgross appearance of malignant melanocytes forming an exophytic protrusion, which also effaces and invades underlying phalangeal bone. HE. Bar = 3.5 mm.

Melanoma incidence not only varies with site but also with breed. Cutaneous melanoma occurs more commonly in dogs with heavily pigmented skin, with the miniature schnauzer, standard schnauzer, and Scottish terrier at increased risk of developing neoplasm.^48,86,90 In addition to the above breeds, Irish setters and golden retrievers are at increased risk of developing subungual melanoma. The Irish Setter, Chihuahua, Golden Retriever, and Cocker Spaniel are at increased risk of developing melanoma of the lip.⁹⁰ German Shepherd Dogs and Boxers are more prone to developing oral melanoma.^175,232 The reason for breed predilection is not entirely clear, but it may reflect an underlying genetic risk or increased pigmentation (or both) in certain breeds. The latter is in contrast to humans where there is no proof of any difference in the relative frequency of oral melanoma in African-Americans and Africans, compared with white cohorts.⁹⁴ Furthermore, cutaneous melanoma is rare in Africans and other races with heavily pigmented skin.⁹⁴ Some authors report a predisposition to oral melanoma in Japanese, Indians, and Hispanics, although others have contradicted this observation.^24,203

Most dogs with melanoma are more than 10 years old with a range of 1–17 years.^7,86,232 An increased frequency has been described in male dogs.^64,90,232 This is similar to humans, where the male/female ratio of oral melanoma is 2–3:1.^13,203

Equine

Up to 15% of all equine skin tumors are melanocytic.^51,120 More than 90% of these tumors are benign at initial presentation, but approximately two-thirds are thought to progress to malignancy and are capable of widespread metastasis.^{92,120,124,130,198,212,213,224,241} The vast majority appear in gray or white horses, usually at or before the age of 5 years, corresponding to the time in their life when their coat color changes.^120,137,150 An early theory of equine melanocytic neoplasia suggested that dermal and visceral melanocytic tumors are a manifestation of a storage disease, rather than malignant neoplasia, and occur as a result of the accumulation of melanin in melanophages during the depigmentation process.^137,212 Melanocytic neoplasms also occur in non-gray or non-white horses, such as bays and chestnuts, and may be more likely to be malignant.¹²⁰ Arab breeds seem to have a predilection for cutaneous melanoma, but statistics may be skewed by the fact that most are gray.^120,136,198 A similar overrepresentation has been observed in Lippizaners and Percherons.⁶⁷

It has been more difficult to attribute any breed or color predisposition to ocular melanomas, which are rare, although such a correlation has been demonstrated in some cases.^14,67 The same is true for oral melanomas, which are uncommon, accounting for 17% of all oropharyngeal neoplasms in horses.⁶⁴

Melanomas are unusual in horses less than 6 years old. They increase in prevalence with age, with 80% of gray horses developing malignant forms by the time they are 15 years old.^92,150,241 There have been inconsistent reports regarding sex predilection. Sundberg et al. (1977)²²⁴ reported multiple dermal melanoma (otherwise called dermal melanomatosis) more frequently in males, whereas others suggest that there is no sex predilection.^120,224,241

Most equine melanomas arise in the skin of the perineal region, the ventral surface of the tail, and external genitalia.^8,92,150 More atypical sites have been reported, such as the coronary band,¹³⁰ foot,¹¹⁰ vertebral region,^124,198 and pelvic canal.¹²⁴ Rarely, the thoracic cavity,^167,225 nasal cavity,⁶² and eye^14,56,67,149 have been involved. Clinical signs range from interference with bridle, bits, and saddle to more serious obstructive lesions in the urogenital or gastrointestinal tract, progressing to life-threatening pulmonary or visceral metastasis.¹²⁰ Neurologic signs have been reported secondary to compression of the spinal cord by metastatic nodules.²¹² Other more unusual manifestations include Horner's syndrome and unilateral sweating.^157,167

Equine metanocytic neoplasms have traditionally been grouped according to one of the three growth patterns. Some grow slowly over many years without metastasizing, whereas others grow slowly initially, with a subsequent increase in the rate of growth after a few years. A third subset grows rapidly and is malignant from the beginning.^120,213 Valentine (1995) has suggested that there are actually at least four possible syndromes of equine melanoma, three of which have the potential for metastatic behavior.²⁴¹ Two of these three categories, dermal melanoma and dermal melanomatosis, are histologically very similar and can only be classified based on clinical features. Dermal melanomas are usually solitary, discrete lesions that are surgically excisable, occurring in a wide age-range of gray horses. Dermal melanomatosis denotes the presence of many lesions, often coalescing and usually occurring in typical locations, such as the genital or perineal region, of gray horses older than 15 years. These are not surgically curable and are much more likely to metastasize internally.^120,241 The third category refers to anaplastic melanoma in aged, non-gray horses. Although rare, it is the most aggressive, leading to death within months of diagnosis.²⁴¹ The fourth category is the melanocytic nevi, which are benign, pigmented lesions predominantly occurring in horses less than 6 years old.^120,241

Feline

Melanoma is uncommon in cats, accounting for less than 1% of all feline oral neoplasms^90,155,220 and approximately 0.5% of feline skin tumors.^32,64,86,182 The ocular and cutaneous forms are generally more common than melanoma of the oral cavity.^57,64,73,182 The most common cutaneous sites are head (Fig. 5), tail, distal extremities,¹⁴⁴ and lumbar area.^57,89,90,243 The prognosis is generally poor because of recurrence and regional metastasis in up to half the cases.^90,243 In a study of 23 cats with nonocular melanocytic tumors, approximately half were malignant, including all the three oral tumors included in the study.¹⁴⁴ In another study, four of the six reported cases of oral melanocytic tumors were malignant, with metastasis to viscera in one case and local invasion in three.¹⁸²

View larger version (147K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Melanoma. Skin of dorsal skull between ears; feline. Exophytic, crusted, discrete mass elevating the epidermis.

The age-range is comparable in several surveys, affecting cats from 2 to 18 years of age but peaking at 8 to 12 years.^{57,84,86,144,182,243} No sex or breed predilection has been demonstrated.

Other species

Melanocytic neoplasms occurs in other domestic species, including cattle, sheep, alpaca, and swine^{106,178,192,252} as well as spontaneously in laboratory animals and in birds.^5,59 Of these species, swine are probably the most important for two reasons. Firstly, the Sinclair miniature and Duroc breeds have a genetic predisposition for melanomas.^178,229 Secondly, the Sinclair miniature pig has served as a model for spontaneous cutaneous melanoma in humans.^{111,156,178,221} The melanocytic tumors can be congenital and are often multiple.¹⁷⁸ In up to 90% of pigs, the tumors usually completely spontaneously regress, a feature that has made this such an attractive model, particularly for studying immunopathogenesis and its potential role in the therapy of melanoma.^111,179 On the other hand, 10–15% of affected pigs succumb to metastatic disease with involvement of regional LN, lungs and liver, as well as other viscera.^163,178 This model shares many features in common with human cutaneous melanomas, including spontaneous development of tumors, a wide spectrum of melanocytic tumors capable of malignant transformation, correlation between deeply invasive tumors and metastatic disease, and the pattern of metastatic spread and histopathology of tumor regression.¹¹¹ In humans the regression is usually partial and perhaps a poor prognostic indicator,¹⁸⁶ although complete remissions have been reported.²⁷ In both human and swine tumors, regression has been associated with a high number of tumor-infiltrative lymphocytes. These lymphocytes have been identified as CD8+ cytotoxic T cells¹⁶³ and display granulated lymphocyte morphology.¹⁹⁴ These are the lymphocytes that react to Melan-A/MART (melanoma antigen recognized by T cells), a cytoplasmic marker that is weaker or not evident in the population of melanoma cells remaining after partial remission of human melanomas.

Uveitis and vitiligo are associated with the spontaneous regression that occurs in these pigs. Cataracts and a band keratopathy, characterized by deposition of calcium salts beneath the basal corneal epithelial cells, have been less frequently observed.^74,135 Such observations have led to a profusion of studies aimed at elucidating the immunopathogenesis of regression. Peripheral blood lymphocytes in swine with regressing melanomas have significant lytic activity against cultured porcine melanocytes; lysis is age-dependent and does not occur in piglets less than 4 weeks old.¹⁹⁴ Histologic changes of regression are biphasic, consisting of tumor infiltration by what appear to be pigment-laden macrophages between 4 and 8 weeks of age, followed by a predominantly lymphocytic response over the next few months.⁹⁸ But the heavily pigmented cells may actually be terminally differentiated melanocytes and not monocyte-derived macrophages.⁹⁷ The end result is the destruction of normal as well as malignant melanocytes.¹³⁵ Circulating antibodies specific to pigment cells in pigs with regressing melanomas have been shown to increase with time and correlate with regression and vitiligo.⁵⁴ More recently, melanoma regression has been associated with loss of telomerase activity, leading eventually to DNA fragmentation and cell death.¹⁸¹ This is an important area of ongoing research, and a complete review of the swine melanoma model is beyond the scope of this article. Other potential animal models for the human disease include the laboratory mouse, the opossum, and the Xiphophorus fish.⁶³

In cattle, melanocytic tumors account for approximately 6% of all tumors, mostly arising in the skin and predominantly affecting cattle with red, gray, or black coats.¹⁵⁴ Reports of malignancy are very uncommon, but metastases can occur.²¹³ The majority of melanoma in cattle have been reported from the Indian subcontinent.^168,192,193 In contrast, in sheep and goats cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms metastasize frequently.²¹³ Angora goats are predisposed and have been proposed as a potential model of human melanoma because of the probable association with UV light.^96,180

Reports in wildlife and exotic species are much less common. There is a single case report of a poorly pigmented cutaneous melanocytoma in a ferret.²³⁶ Melanocytic neoplasms are very rare in birds, with only single case reports in the literature.^5,129

	Gross Pathology

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 
Melanoma can vary considerably in appearance, regardless of the site. Melanoma may be of any color, ranging from gray or brown to black, red, or even dark blue.^62,102,153 Pigmentation is not a specific feature because other neoplastic or nonneoplastic lesions can be phenotypically similar. Melanoma vary in size, but most fall within the range of 1–3 cm.^48,102 Cutaneous melanoma may be smooth domes, sessile nodules (Fig. 5), polypoid, plaquelike, or even lobulated masses;^86,102,166 larger ones are often ulcerated. In the horse they are often flat and firm, may be single or multiple, and can coalesce, creating a cobblestone appearance.¹²⁰ Alopecia and ulceration are variable features.

Lesions found at necropsy depend on how far the neoplasm has progressed and range from local primary tumor masses to widely disseminated metastases (Figs. 2, 3).^{57,86,198,254} Individual tumors vary from 1 mm to several centimeters diameter.²¹² Neoplastic masses can be compressive, although they are usually unencapsulated and infiltrative.¹⁸⁷ They can also be poorly defined, effacing normal structures rather than forming discrete masses.^110,130 Pigmentation is variable, but often the masses are black.

Regardless of site, melanomas can metastasize via the lymphatic or blood vessels, with regional LN being the usual first target.¹¹⁰ Any of the visceral organs can potentially be infiltrated, but the lungs are most commonly involved.^{17,21,92,130,158,182,198} Infrequently, extension and metastasis to serosal surfaces, such as pericardium, pleura and peritoneum, occur; associated effusions may be black.¹⁵⁷ Melanomas have the potential to invade bones and cause bony lysis in areas such as digit, maxilla, mandible, vertebrae, and ribs.^148,182,198

	Histopathologic Variants

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 
Histopathologic variants in animals

The term nevus, commonly used in describing pigmented melanocytic lesions of the epidermis and dermis in humans, is not used in veterinary dermatopathology.⁸⁸ When evaluating melanocytic neoplasms they may be compound, denoting both an epidermal-epithelial and dermal-submucosal component to the neoplasm, or dermal and submucosal with no identifiable epidermal or epithelial component (Fig. 6). Junctional refers to the proliferation of neoplastic melanocytes at the interface between the epidermis and dermis or epithelium and submucosa.⁸⁸ Pagetoid refers to the presence of either individual or small aggregates of neoplastic cells within the upper levels of the epidermis or epithelium⁹⁰ (Fig. 7) and was originally used to describe the carcinoma cells (Paget cells) that infiltrate the epidermis overlying mammary ductal carcinomas in situ.⁵²

View larger version (157K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Melanoma. Skin; canine. The dermal neoplastic cells are fusiform and epithelioid. Melanocytic hyperplasia is evident in the epidermis, but it is nonneoplastic. HE. Bar = 40 µm. Fig. 7. Melanoma. Oral; canine. Pagetoid infiltration of oral mucosa by individual cells and nests of cells (arrows) and neurotization of submucosal neoplasm. HE. Bar = 40 µm.

View larger version (216K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Melanoma. Ear; canine. Fig. 8a. Epithelioid cells arranged in packets. Cells are fairly uniform with a high nucleus to cytoplasmic ratio and sparse intracytoplasmic melanin. HE. Bar = 30 µm. Fig. 8b. Cytologic preparation of same tissue seen in Fig. 8a. Cells are round with moderately high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios, round nuclei, fine lacy chromatin, multiple, distinct nucleoli, and a moderate amount of nonpigmented cytoplasm, stained light gray blue in the original image. A single mitotic figure is present in the center of the image. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 10 µm. Fig. 9. Melanoma. Ear; feline. Fig. 9a. Pleomorphic round cells arranged in sheets. Many cells have abundant cytoplasm and sometimes two or more nuclei. HE. Bar = 30 µm. Fig. 9b. Cytologic preparation of same tissue seen in Fig. 9a. The arrow indicates a single giant nucleolus present in a giant neoplastic cell. Fine pigment granules are occasionally detectable in the neoplastic cells. Melanophages are identifiable by their coarse pigment granules. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 20 µm. Fig. 10. Melanoma. Lip; canine. Fig. 10a. Mixed round and epithelioid cell proliferation. HE. Bar = 60 µm. Fig. 10b. Cytologic preparation of same tissue seen in Fig. 10a. The epithelioid neoplastic cells are found in adherent clusters. Nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios are high, with round nuclei, fine chromatin, distinct nucleoli, and a small amount of finely vacuolated cytoplasm. Pigmentation is not apparent. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 10 µm.

View larger version (217K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 11. Melanoma. Head; feline. Fig. 11a. Mixed epithelioid and spindle cell pattern. Poorly pigmented epithelioid cells arranged in packets and nests with intervening more heavily pigmented spindle-shaped cells. HE. Bar = 30 µm. Fig. 11b. Cytologic preparation of same tissue seen in Fig. 11a. Many of the neoplastic cells were represented by only bare nuclei. Intact cells tended to be spindle form, with many fine pigment granules. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 10 µm. Fig. 12. Metastatic (lungs) and primary (mouth) melanoma. Canine. Fig. 12a. Metastatic melanoma. Lungs; canine. Nonpigmented spindle-shaped cells arranged in tightly interweaving streams and bundles. The primary tumor was oral (see Fig. 12b). HE. Bar = 60 µm. Fig. 12b. Melanoma. oral; canine. Cytologic preparation of primary oral melanoma. The primary is pigmented and epithelioid, whereas the metastatic sites contain amelanotic spindle-shaped cells, seen in Fig. 12a. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 10 µm. Fig. 13. Melanoma. Oropharynx; canine. Fig. 13a. Small groups of packeted epithelioid cells, with high nucleus to cytoplasmic ratios and prominent large nucleoli, intermingle with more spindle-shaped cells. HE. Bar = 30 µm. Fig. 13b. Cytologic preparation of same tissue seen in Fig. 13a. The round to oval neoplastic melanocytes contain 1–2 nuclei, with fine to slightly coarse chromatin, multiple, variably sized nucleoli, and moderately abundant fine to occasionally coarsely pigmented cytoplasm, which was stained very light gray blue in the original image. Nuclear clefting is visible in the cell in the lower left corner. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 10 µm.

View larger version (171K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 14. Melanoma. Skin of foot; canine. A balloon cell variant. The cells have an abundant amount of pale eosinophilic but slightly dusty brown cytoplasm. There are fine fibrovascular trabeculae of connective tissue forming multiple small lobules. HE. Bar = 60 µm. Fig. 15. Melanoma. Oral cavity–maxilla; canine. There is a transition from cells that are round to more fusiform to cells with a basophilic cytoplasm, indicative of early chondroid differentiation.

Generally, cutaneous melanoma in domestic animals does not share the same degree of diversity described in the medical literature.¹⁷⁰ In veterinary pathology, because dysplastic nevi are not recognized as a specific entity, the pathologist is not required to differentiate between severely dysplastic nevi, melanoma in situ, and early invasive melanoma, all of which differ in their prognostic significance. Furthermore, most animal melanomas are advanced invasive masses when removed for histopathologic evaluation, corresponding to nodular melanoma in humans, whereas most melanomas in humans are the superficial spreading type, which are most often relatively small, thin tumors that are confined to the epidermis and dermis. Some direct histopathologic correlations can be made between human and canine melanoma in that both forms may be composed primarily of spindle cells, epithelioid or round cells, or a mixture of these cell types.⁷⁰ There are similarities between oral melanoma in dogs and humans. As in dogs, the prognosis for oral melanoma in humans is very poor regardless of morphology,⁷⁰ and no link has been found between survival rate and histologic type.⁷²

Cutaneous melanomas in humans are most commonly classified according to their growth pattern variants. The most common types are superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma, lentigo maligna melanoma, and acral lentiginous melanoma.^36,222 This classification system is thought to represent subgroups with similar etiologies as well as biologic, clinical, and prognostic features,^183,222 although the validity of this theory has been questioned.²⁵⁰ All four have two growth phases of variable duration—radial growth with epidermal involvement only and vertical growth with dermal invasion.²²² Superficial spreading melanoma is the most common melanoma seen in Caucasians accounting for 70% of all melanomas.¹²⁷ This tumor is typically found on the trunk and extremities, with no predilection for chronically sun-damaged skin, and is composed of predominantly large, atypical epithelioid melanocytes. Nodular melanoma is predominantly dermal, with only a minor intraepidermal component. It is generally heavily pigmented, predominantly epithelioid, often ulcerated, and rapidly progressive, with essentially no clinically discernable radial growth phase (RGP).¹²⁷ It is the second most common melanoma, accounting for 15–30%,¹²⁷ with tumors generally found in skin that has been chronically sun damaged, e.g., the head, neck, and trunk. Lentigo maligna melanoma originates from lentigo maligna, which is typically seen on sun-exposed skin of elderly patients. The precursor lesion, lentigo maligna, is the early RGP (in situ) and can be present for years before the vertical growth phase (VGP) occurs, at which time the lesion is considered a melanoma. Spindle-shaped cells predominate over epithelioid cells in the VGP for this melanoma. Acral lentiginous melanoma occurs on the hands and feet, including the digits and subungual regions. This is the most common type of melanoma seen in Asians, African-Americans, and Hispanics.²²²

The variables listed below are used as prognostic indicators in humans with cutaneous superficial spreading and nodular melanomas to estimate 5- and 10-year survival with a 95% confidence level and to stage disease.^{2,11,36,45,146} Physicians are advised to use these variables for tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging of cutaneous melanomas with other growth patterns, e.g., lentigo maligna melanoma and acral lentiginous melanoma but with the caveat that these other groups may have different etiologies and different prognoses. Variables numbered 1–7 are those used by the Melanoma Staging Committee of the American Joint Committee on Cancer as the basis for the currently accepted staging system for cutaneous melanomas in people¹¹ and have been found to be independent predictors of survival. The remaining variables are not incorporated into the TNM system because they are difficult to objectively relate to survival curves, their status is controversial, or because they are not clearly independent of other factors, e.g., tumor thickness. Recording of these values for individual patients is recommended. It is interesting to note that morphologic atypia is not included in this list.

1) Modified Breslow²⁹ thickness of primary tumor: measured from stratum granulosum to deepest portion of neoplasm; considered the most significant.¹⁴⁶ Using the TNM staging protocol¹¹ assignments are as follows: T1 = <1.0 mm; T2 = 1.01–2.0 mm; T3 = 2.01–4.0 mm; T4 = >4.0 mm.

2) Ulceration: defined as microscopically detected absence of intact epidermis overlying a major portion of the primary melanoma that is not artifactual or secondary to trauma. Ulceration signifies locally advanced disease with higher risk of metastasis compared with nonulcerated tumors of like thickness.

3) Level of invasion: under new guidelines, Clark's levels⁴⁶ are now only used for thin melanomas (T1)¹¹

Level I—confined to the epidermis (melanoma in situ)

Level II—Extend from epidermis into papillary dermis, but papillary dermis not filled or expanded

Level III—Expand and fill the papillary dermis

Level IV—Infiltration of the reticular dermis

Level V—Infiltration of the subcutaneous fat

4) The number of metastatic LN and whether or not the metastasis is detected clinically or microscopically: although both indicate a poorer prognosis than no metastasis, macroscopic (clinical) detection is worse than microscopic detection (clinically occult).

5) Intralymphatic invasion: either satellite metastasis around the primary or in-transit metastasis between the primary and the regional LN; both sites have an equally poor prognostic significance that is about equivalent to detection of metastasis in multiple regional LN.

6) Site(s) of distant metastasis: melanomas metastatic to skin, subcutaneous tissue, and distant nodal sites have a better prognosis compared with lung metastasis, which is intermediate compared with other visceral sites, which have the poorest prognosis.

7) Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH): elevated LDH is associated with diminished survival; a high LDH must be confirmed by two elevated LDH values determined more than 24 hours apart and not because of other factors, e.g., hemolysis or liver disease.

8) Number of metastatic sites: this variable was not incorporated into the TNM system because of the lack of standardization of diagnostic strategies used to search for metastatic sites.

9) Site: a prognostic advantage is seen in patients with nondistal appendicular tumors, as opposed to axial (trunk, head, neck), subungual, palms, or soles,^114,227 but this disappears when tumors are controlled for thickness, age, and sex.¹⁴⁶

10) Mitotic count: number per millimeter²: high counts are indicators of a worse prognosis.

11) Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs): brisk, nonbrisk, or absent; nonbrisk or lack of TILs is considered a high-risk attribute.

12) Age: poorer prognosis if > 60 years.

13) Growth phase: RGP versus VGP.²¹⁸

14) Sex: there is a slight survival advantage for women.

15) Regression: absent or present; regression being defined as evidence of loss of continuity of the lesion and fibrosis, which appears to correlate with high risk of metastasis, as opposed to actual regression of disease; surviving cells after regression represent a subpopulation that is more likely to migrate into lymphatics. The prognostic value of this trait is still uncertain.

Criteria of malignancy

Melanoma may be one of the few neoplasms in animals for which location is an important prognostic indicator in its own right. Melanocytic neoplasias involving the oral cavity, subungual region, and mucocutaneous junctions are considered malignant, regardless of any other single feature.⁷ Interestingly, this also seems to be the case with oral melanoma in humans. There is no evident relationship between histologic characteristics, including mitotic index and pigmentation, and survival rate.^70,190 The prognosis for human melanoma at mucocutaneous junctions and mucosal surfaces is also grave.²⁰³

In animal skin and eye melanocytic neoplasms, the most reliable histologic feature for distinguishing malignant from benign is the mitotic index.^{25,26,35,65,158,254} In the World Health Organization's Histologic Classification of Epithelial and Melanocytic Skin Tumors of Domestic Animals,⁸⁸ three or more mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields indicate malignancy. The identification of mitotic figures in sections must be undertaken with great care to ensure that only true mitoses are counted. Bleached sections should be used for pigmented neoplasms to avoid confusing mitoses with pyknotic nuclei and the small hyperchromatic nuclei of the spindle cells of the supporting stroma. The mitotic count will vary from area to area within the neoplasm, and the count should be performed in areas with the greatest concentration of mitotic figures. Where metastases have been confirmed, the mitotic rate in intraocular melanoma is usually greater than four per 10 high-power fields; less than two mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields is consistent with a melanocytoma.^35,254 In cats the value of mitotic activity to prediction of outcome is less clear, particularly with regard to ocular melanoma.^21,22,65 Some authors, however, report a link between high mitotic index and increased risk of metastatic disease.^57,68

Neoplastic cell morphology is also a useful discriminating feature.^25,69,88 Cytologic features of malignancy include the presence of a large nucleus, variation in nuclear size and shape, hyperchromasia, abnormal chromatin clumping, one or more nucleoli, and atypical mitotic figures.^65,86 Additional features favoring malignancy are the presence of neoplastic cells, individually or in nests, within the upper layers of the epidermis (Fig. 7),^65,86,88 although ulceration and necrosis may prevent evaluation of this feature. The presence or absence of junctional activity is not specific to melanoma and often occurs in melanocytomas.

The gold standard is, of course, lymphatic or vascular invasion.⁸⁸ Pathologists are often asked to evaluate mandibular LN for evidence of metastatic disease in dogs with oral melanoma. These nodes may be pigmented because of metastatic melanoma or the accumulation of melanophages within the medullary sinuses. The latter occurs when melanophages are transported to the regional LN after inflammation of the oral mucosa, particularly in dogs with pigmented oral epithelium. The cytologic features described above, when used to evaluate bleached sections, usually suffice to distinguish melanophages from melanoma.

In cats the following histologic features have been proposed to be of significance in identifying cutaneous melanoma: nuclear atypia (neoplasms with more extensive atypia are more likely to be malignant), mitotic activity (a trend of greater malignancy with increased numbers of mitoses), and tumor cell type (with epithelioid more likely to be malignant).⁸⁹ The relationship with cell type is not firmly established in the literature, in that two studies indicate a less precise relationship between cell type and malignant potential.^144,155 Furthermore, histologic determination of malignancy does not consistently correlate with clinical behavior.¹⁴⁴

The Callender system has been used historically to determine malignant potential in canine anterior uveal melanocytic neoplasms.^158,254 This system was designed to predict the behavior of ocular melanoma in humans,³⁷ which led to criticisms of its use in the veterinary literature for two main reasons. Firstly, it was designed for malignant tumors in humans, and most canine intraocular melanocytic tumors are benign.^234,254 Secondly, the morphology of the canine neoplastic melanocytes does not match the cell descriptions in the Callender classification.^35,158,254 Several authors favor a simpler system, dividing intraocular melanocytic tumors into benign and malignant using well-recognized cytologic features of malignancy as a basis for this classification.^158,254 Despite these controversies, some useful morphologic features can be used to ascribe malignancy, especially with canine anterior uveal melanoma. A greater risk of metastasis tends to occur in mixed and epithelioid cell types.²⁰⁶ Melanocytic neoplasms containing narrow spindle-shaped cells with small nuclei and no mitotic figures, or plump cells with large amounts of melanin and small round nuclei, are more likely to be benign.⁸¹ This is in contrast to the cat where cellular pleomorphism, degree of pigmentation, nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, and number of nucleoli bear no relationship to the metastatic behavior of uveal melanocytic tumors.⁶⁸

Tumor size,^{26,80,105,200} degree of pigmentation, intensity of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)–staining,²⁰⁰ the presence of necrosis, ulceration, or inflammation,^26,80,254 and p53 expression²⁰¹ are of limited prognostic value in animals. Depth of tumor invasion into the skin is an important criterion in human medicine but is felt to be too impractical in animals.⁶⁹ More sophisticated techniques, such as flow cytometry to detect chromosomal anomalies, offer no real advantage over histology in predicting tumor behavior.^25,112 The value of determination of a proliferative index using MIB-1, a monoclonal antibody to Ki-67, which identifies proliferating cells, has been investigated. One study examined 27 canine and feline melanocytic tumors, eight benign and 19 malignant, to correlate Ki-67 and PCNA activity with 6-month survival.²⁰⁰ Ki-67 activity correlated very well with poor survival but so did the presence of invasive growth and classification based on cytologic criteria. PCNA was significantly higher in malignant neoplasms, but levels did not demonstrate a strong correlation with poor survival. In a separate study, MIB-1 was applied to 68 cutaneous canine melanocytic neoplasms to determine if the level of immunoreactivity would correlate with 2-year survival. Eighteen of 68 tumors were classed as malignant histologically. The predictive value of the Ki-67 index for 2-year survival was 97%, which was only slightly higher than the predictive value associated with histologic evaluation (91%).¹³³

Differential diagnosis

Other tumors can look clinically very similar to melanoma, particularly those arising from the skin. These include melanocytoma as well as pigmented lesions of the epidermis and adnexa, e.g., feline basal cell tumors and carcinomas, trichoblastoma, trichoepithelioma, pilomatricoma, sebaceous, and apocrine neoplasms. Ceruminous cysts in the feline may be mistaken for multicentric melanoma of the pinna. Melanocytic hyperplasia (lentigo simplex) on the lips, eyelids, nose, and gingiva of orange, cream, and silver cats appear as pigmented macules at these sites. Hyperpigmented macular lesions clinically resembling melanoma may occur in the skin in dogs, primarily the abdomen and nipple. Similarly, epidermal hamartomas (pigmented epidermal nevi, canine seborrheic keratosis), and dermal hemangioma and hemangiosarcoma can appear as pigmented cutaneous tumors.^87,88

Nonmelanocytic neoplasms that commonly arise in the oral cavity and eye seldom present clinically as pigmented tumors; therefore, pigmentation is not a distraction.

	Cytopathologic Variants

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 
Cytomorphology tends to reflect histologic findings, in that cells can be typed as epithelioid (Figs. 8b, 9b, 10b, 12b), round (Fig. 16), or spindle form (Figs. 11b, 17a–d),^{9,79,104,238,255} with agreement reported to be 78% in one study.⁴¹ Although, just as in histologic classification, cytomorphology is highly variable, a few generalizations can be made.^76,239 Nuclei tend to be central to eccentrically located, round to oval, with moderately dense to very fine chromatin and prominent round, oval, or angular nucleoli. Giant nucleoli are a common finding. Nuclei are usually solitary, but occasional binucleated and multinucleated forms are possible. Although not unique to melanoma, longitudinal folding of the nuclear membrane has been reported as a feature in oval nuclear forms stained with Papanicolaou.²⁰⁴ Folding has not been reported in veterinary literature; however, Papanicolaou staining is rarely used in veterinary clinical laboratories. Nuclear indentation or clefting can be seen. Nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios are moderately high to very high. Melanomas do not usually incite a vigorous acute inflammatory response, such as is seen with SCC, unless there is superficial ulceration of the tumor. It is more typical to detect chronic inflammation characterized by few to moderate numbers of melanophages. In cases with visceral metastasis, melanophages may also be observed in the peripheral blood and malignant effusions.²²⁸

View larger version (143K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 16. Cytology. Metastatic melanoma. Mandibular LN; canine. The nonadherent cells are round to very slightly spindle form, with very high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios, round nuclei, multiple medium-sized nucleoli, and a small amount of light gray to gray-blue cytoplasm. Very rare fine blue-black pigment granules were occasionally detected. The determination of melanocytic derivation was helped by knowledge of the previous biopsy report of an oral melanoma and current physical examination findings, which revealed mandibular lymphadenopathy on same side. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 20 µm.

View larger version (140K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 17a–d. Metastatic spindle cell melanoma. (a) Liver; canine and (b–d) jugular furrow; canine. The primary melanoma was oral. Fig. 17a. Histology. Liver–at necropsy. The pleomorphic metastatic cells are predominantly spindle shaped; however, the primary oral mass, as well as an earlier site of metastasis in the mandibular LN, was epithelioid (see Fig. 21). HE. Bar = 30 µm. Fig. 17b–d. Cytology. Jugular furrow–ante mortem. The cytologic interpretation was spindle cell tumor. Determination of melanocytic derivation was delayed until necropsy examination. There was no evidence of cytoplasmic pigmentation. Fig. 17c, d are enlarged details from Fig. 17b. Cells display marked anisokaryosis, with oval nuclei, fine chromatin, faint nucleoli, and occasional binucleation and nuclear clefting. Wright-Giemsa. Figure 17b: Bar = 50 µm. Figure 17c: Bar = 20 µm. Figure 17d: Bar = 10 µm.

Just as in histologic evaluations, distinguishing benign from malignant can be difficult. Using the number of mitotic figures per high-power field does not work well for cytologic specimens because mitotic figures may not preserve well enough to identify, and the number of cells per high-power field is not uniform. Identification of atypical mitotic figures is also difficult unless they are very bizarre because smearing can create chromosomal artifacts that mimic atypia. Generally, the standard cytologic criteria for malignancy is applied, i.e., marked anisocytosis and anisokaryosis, large to giant nucleoli, atypical nucleoli, and marked pleomorphism. Cytologically benign tumors should be assessed histologically to determine malignant potential, unless of course the cells are detected in an inappropriate location, e.g., LN.

Cytologic determination of specific melanocytic derivation can be problematic in amelanotic or poorly pigmented tumors because of the tendency to mimic other types of neoplasms. Cell size and general morphologic features of the round cell variant can be similar to benign and malignant histiocytic neoplasms, plasmacytomas, poorly differentiated mast cell tumors, and some lymphosarcomas. Lymphoglandular bodies are used as a guide to identification of lymphoid tissue and lymphoid malignancies, but these globular cytoplasmic fragments can occasionally be seen with other neoplasms, including melanomas,⁷⁵ although usually at a much lower frequency. Spindle-form melanomas containing pigment are easily identified, but amelanotic forms can be confused with reactive tissue,⁴⁴ hemangiopericytoma, histiocytic sarcoma, or other nonpigmented mesenchymal tumors. Pigmented epithelioid forms can be mistaken for pigmented epithelial cell tumors, e.g., thyroid adenomas of follicular origin¹²⁸ and thyroid carcinoma.^10,216,217 Amelanotic epithelioid melanoma can be very similar to carcinoma; however, careful inspection of smears usually results in detection of a greater range of pleomorphism, which will often include all three forms: round, spindle, and epithelioid. Carcinomas may be markedly variable in size, but, unlike epithelioid melanomas, they usually display a consistent overall shape, with few nonadherent spindle or round forms detected. Careful inspection of cytoplasm for rare black granules and the concurrent presence of melanophages in a markedly pleomorphic neoplasm helps in the identification of melanoma. Melanophages within both melanotic and amelanotic tumors tend to contain few to abundant variably sized pigmented lysosomal granules (compound melanosomes) and can be vacuolated.²³⁸ The coarse nature of these granules and the smaller macrophage nuclei and nucleoli help distinguish these cells from neoplastic cells, although this distinction is not always clear (Fig. 18).⁷⁹ Melanin pigment in both melanocytes and melanophages can be confused with hemosiderin, but hemosiderin is easily distinguished by positive staining using the cytochemical Perls Prussian blue technique.⁷⁶ Fontana stain, another cytochemical stain,⁷⁸ and immunocytochemical stains^4,6 may also be of assistance but are not in common use for routine cytopathologic evaluation of pigmented tumors.¹⁸⁹

View larger version (117K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 18. Melanoma. Ear; feline (same tissue as seen in Fig. 9b). The single melanophage is distinguished from surrounding melanocytes by its coarse pigment granules, cytoplasmic vacuolization, and distinctive nuclear features. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 10 µm.

Regional LN are the most common sites aspirated when monitoring for metastasis. A veterinary study that compared cytologic and histologic findings in FNAC of LN for detection of tumor metastasis found an overall sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 96%, respectively;¹³² however, the study included only two melanomas, which had negative nodes by both biopsy and cytology. An earlier study to determine the degree of correlation between cytologic and histologic evaluations of skin masses and LN aspirates mentions successful detection of metastatic melanoma in LN for two cases that matched the histologic findings.¹⁰¹ The literature on humans contains many reports, which consistently demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for FNAC as a means to detect melanoma metastasis in LN.^{116,141,184,185} Morphology of metastatic melanoma is just as variable as the primary.⁷⁹ Round (Fig. 19), spindle, (Fig. 20) and epithelioid (Fig. 21) forms can be found in local LN. These cells can be found scattered throughout the smear at a low frequency, focal within regions of a smear, or may completely efface the node, resulting in an aspirate containing no lymphoid tissue. It is often useful to have smears of the primary to compare with cells detected at a low frequency in the LN.

View larger version (104K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 19. Cytology. Metastatic melanoma. Mandibular LN; canine. The arrows indicate moderately large to giant round, nonadherent melanoblasts, with giant abnormal nucleoli in the largest cell. Most of the small cells are normal lymphocytes. The primary was oral. m = macrophages. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 20 µm. Fig. 20. Cytology. Metastatic melanoma. Mandibular LN; feline. The arrows indicate the cytoplasmic limits of the spindle-shaped melanoblasts present in this LN aspirate. The primary was facial. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 10 µm. Fig. 21. Cytology. Metastatic melanoma. Mandibular LN; canine. The epithelioid melanoblasts almost completely replace normal lymphoid tissue, although occasional small lymphocytes can be seen (arrows). The primary was oral. Wright-Giemsa. Bar = 10 µm.

Melanoma-induced peritoneal or pleural effusions frequently contain both the malignant cells and melanophages.^{6,77,117,228,248} Morphology of the melanoma cells is usually round to epithelioid (Figs. 22–24), with signet ring and balloon cell morphology possible.^{16,82,121,143,173,174,214,235,248} If spindle form, the cells may display short, blunt cytoplasmic processes (Fig. 25) rather than the longer processes typical of the solid tumors. Scant pigmentation may preclude a definitive interpretation of melanoma, but usually a history accompanies these submissions, enabling a guess as to derivation. Fluid counts are usually consistent with either a modified transudate or inflammatory exudate. There are insufficient reports in the literature regarding melanoma-induced effusions to state the frequency of false negatives, but for neoplasia in general, about 40% will be nondiagnostic.¹⁰⁹

View larger version (129K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 22. Melanoma. Eyelid; canine. Most canine melanomas of the eyelid are benign, but this neoplasm displayed marked pleomorphism. Neoplastic cells extended to the surgical margins. HE. Bar = 30 µm. Figs. 23–25. Metastatic melanoma. Pleural fluid; canine. Pleural fluid was collected 2 months later from the same dog with the eyelid mass shown in Fig. 22. The cells were markedly pleomorphic and included giant, multinucleated cells (Fig. 23), epithelioid cells (Fig. 24), and odd spindle to stellate cells with thin, irregular cytoplasmic extensions (Fig. 25). The arrows indicate pigment granules. Wright-Giemsa. Figures 23–24: bar = 10 µm. Figure 25: bar = 12.5 µm.

	Additional Diagnostic Techniques

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

Histochemistry

Bleaching melanomas with hypochlorite is the simplest traditional technique; melanin pigment is extracted to avoid its masking effect of cell morphology and mitotic activity.²³⁰ Histochemical stains, such as the Masson-Fontana silver stain, employ the argentaffin reaction to reduce silver in ammoniacal solutions. Melanin acts as the reducing agent in these reactions. The main disadvantage of this technique is the lack of specificity—substances such as lipofuscin can cross-react with these stains.²⁰ More specific to melanin-producing cells is the enzyme tyrosinase, or dihydroxyphenylalanine oxidase (DOPA), which is responsible for converting tyrosine to melanin. In the DOPA test, tyrosine is replaced by dihydroxyphenylalanine, which is in turn converted by DOPA oxidase to a substance indistinguishable from melanin.²⁵⁶ For practical purposes, this test is more applicable to nonpigmented melanomas, where the above chemical reaction results in the formation of brown/black pigment in the cytoplasm of neoplastic cells, confirming the presence of DOPA oxidase (tyrosinase) in those cells. The major disadvantage of this test is that it requires fresh tissue. These traditional methods are now being superseded by IHC.

Electron microscopy

Melanocytes, as well as many other nonmelanocytic tumor cells, contain melanosomes, demonstrable ultrastructurally by EM^55,71 Melanosomes indicate that the cell in which they occur is actively producing melanin pigment,^43,55 but they must be differentiated from compound melanosomes, which are really secondary lysosomes extruded by melanocytes and taken up by keratinocytes and macrophages.⁵⁵ True melanosomes usually have cross-striations, whereas secondary melanosomes do not.⁵⁵ Although melanomas can be recognized ultrastructurally by the presence of aberrant melanosomes, few of these structures are present in amelanotic forms of melanoma. Instead, abnormal or immature premelanosomes are a feature in the Golgi complex. There are a number of drawbacks associated with EM. Firstly, suitable tissue should be collected for reliable diagnosis although often melanosomes are sturdy enough to withstand formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. Secondly, the cells in which the premelanosomes are detected have to be representative neoplastic cells from a pertinent neoplasm. Melanosomes and premelanosomes are not entirely specific to melanomas because they are also found in other tumors originating from the neural crest.⁷⁰ Melanosomes have been demonstrated in normal and neoplastic keratinocytes⁷¹ and in some neuroendocrine neoplasms, particularly those of thyroid parafollicular C-cells (medullary thyroid carcinomas).^19,147 Thirdly, detection of these structures requires prolonged examination of multiple sections at high magnification.⁷¹

Immunohistochemistry

Specific IHC to identify amelanotic melanoma is needed. Most, if not all, melanomas are vimentin positive and cytokeratin negative in humans, dogs, and cats,^{183,188,209,243} but other neoplasms can have a similar staining pattern with these antibodies, particularly sarcomas.¹⁸⁸ Another moderately useful marker is the antibody against S100, an intracellular and intranuclear acidic, calcium-binding protein.^{71,209,210,243} Most melanomas are reported to be S100 positive, but the same is true of many other neurogenic and nonneurogenic tumors, including carcinoids.^{122,169,190,200} Normal S100 cells are also widely distributed, particularly in epithelial and lymphoid tissue.²⁰⁹ Antibody to neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is also frequently used for identification of melanocytic neoplasms, but this marker is also not specific, in that NSE may be found in a variety of tissues, including smooth muscle and neuroendocrine tissue.¹⁹⁰

Melan-A, a protein of unknown function that elicits a cytotoxic T-cell response, has a narrow tissue distribution and is generally strongly positive in melanocyte cytoplasm. It may be the most specific IHC test in use at this time. Ramos-Vara et al.¹⁹⁰ did an immunohistochemical review of 122 canine oral melanomas plus seven metastatic melanomas with unknown primary sites. Tumors were 92% Melan-A positive, 100% vimentin positive, 98% S100 positive, and 89.1% NSE positive. The authors did not state the proportion of amelanotic melanomas that were Melan-A positive but because 32% of the total number of tumors was nonpigmented it must be assumed that a significant proportion of amelanotic tumors reacted to the antibody. Furthermore, the distribution of Melan-A in a melanoma did not simply duplicate the distribution of melanin because melanophages were negative for Melan-A. Finally, two of the three clear cell melanomas in this study were Melan-A positive.¹⁹⁰ Only four (2.45%) of the 163 nonmelanocytic tumors were positive for Melan-A and only weakly so. These included two salivary carcinomas and two transitional cell carcinomas, which were easily distinguished from melanomas by morphology alone. They concluded that Melan-A is a useful marker for melanocytic derivation in tumors of uncertain lineage.

A slightly more recent but smaller study¹²⁶ of 29 canine melanocytic tumors, which included 10 melanomas, 11 melanocytomas, and eight uncertain, found that Melan-A (designated Melan-A/MART-1) was positive in 90% of pigmented tumors but failed to stain amelanotic tumors. Ten tumors were amelanotic. Seven of these were classed as malignant, whereas the remaining three were uncertain. In their hands, Melan-A was infrequently positive in malignant tumors, with only three of the 10 melanomas staining positive for Melan-A (the three that were pigmented). On the other hand, all the 11 melanocytomas were positive, with 10 of these classed as moderate to strongly positive (all benign tumors were pigmented). These authors suggested that Melan-A staining may correlate with biologic behavior, with benign tumors staining moderately or strongly positive and malignant tumors showing weak or negative staining, but also seemed to show that Melan-A mostly duplicated the distribution of pigmentation.¹²⁶ The study outlined in the previous paragraph was larger (129 versus 10 malignant tumors), had 92% positive results (versus 30% in the smaller study), and found that distribution did not exclusively coincide with pigmentation. Therefore, the larger study offers stronger support for Melan-A as a good marker for tumors of melanocytic derivation, independent of pigmentation. Seven of the 122 oral tumors had evaluation of metastatic sites. Two were negative for Melan-A at both the primary and the metastatic sites. Five were positive at both the primary and the metastatic sites, but Melan-A staining of metastatic cells was weaker. So, although advancing disease resulted in a weakening of positivity, the strong staining pattern of the primary did not predict nonaggressive disease for these cases. In humans, the loss of Melan-A positivity sometimes seen in melanomas is thought to reflect selection for a Melan-A negative variant after partial regression secondary to tumor infiltration by cytotoxic T-lymphocytes.²⁰⁷

It remains unproven that Melan-A expression is a predictor of less aggressive behavior, but it may be a worthwhile marker for identification of tumors of uncertain lineage, especially when used in combination with S100. A study of 48 feline melanomas found 67% were positive for Melan-A, and 87.5% were positive for S100.¹⁹¹ The conclusion offered by this article is that Melan-A in cat tumors is not as sensitive as S100 but more specific and could be used to distinguish heavily pigmented melanocytic tumors from pigmented basal cell tumors. On the other hand, basal cell tumors are cytokeratin positive, whereas melanomas are not. The authors advise the use of both Melan-A and S100 in diagnosing melanomas in cats.

The advent of murine antibodies specific for melanoma-associated antigens, particularly melanosomes,²⁰ has helped improve the value of IHC in the diagnosis of melanoma in human medicine. Often a panel of appropriate antibodies is advocated,^3,95,246 an approach also favored in veterinary literature.²⁰ Monoclonal antibodies to human melanosome–specific antigens (HMSA) 1 and 5 are typical examples, reacting with 60 and 69% of canine melanomas, respectively, increasing to 83% when used in combination. This also demonstrates the heterogeneity of antigen expression and the subsequent value of using multiple antibodies at the same time.²⁰ Although monoclonal antibody for HMB-45 has proven to be a sensitive marker for certain subtypes of human melanomas, HMB-45 is generally considered less useful in animals.^20,71,177 But the utility of HMB-45 for animal tumors may be improved by a process that includes pretreatment of formalin-fixed tissues with KMnO4-oxalic acid. One study reports that 88% of melanomas stained positive for HMB-45 after KMnO4-oxalic acid pretreatment, whereas only 6% of nonmelanocytic tumors were positive.²²³

IBF9 is the first murine monoclonal antibody specifically created to recognize canine melanoma antigen¹⁷⁶ and is highly sensitive (greater than 80%). Although it does cross-react with other types of neoplasia, such as basal cell tumors and lymphosarcomas, these neoplasms can easily be ruled out using additional immunohistochemical testing and, on the whole, are not likely to be confused morphologically in the first instance.

In situ hybridization

Although requiring more technical skills and equipment, ISH, using a complementary DNA probe for tyrosinase-specific mRNA, is a highly specific and sensitive tool and can be performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.³⁴ Because amelanotic and pigmented melanomas contain similar levels of tyrosinase-specific mRNA, ISH is potentially a valuable tool for the diagnosis of poorly differentiated melanomas.²²⁶ It has been used to confirm balloon cell and signet ring type melanomas in cats, although it does suffer from certain technical flaws such as degradation of mRNA with tissue handling and formalin fixation.²⁴³

	Future Diagnostics

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 
Research into the pathogenesis of melanoma is creating a source of additional information for development of future diagnostic methods. Much work is currently underway in human medicine to try and identify specific tumor markers, i.e., proteins that are associated with malignancy.¹⁴⁰ Applicable detection techniques encompass IHC, ISH, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and reverse transcriptase-PCR, as well as fluorescent IHC. Using these methods, protein or DNA mutations specific to a particular malignant neoplasm may be shown circulating in the blood, for example.¹⁴⁰ Serological markers, including cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, and melanoma-inhibitory activity, have also been investigated as potential sentinels of melanoma. Generally, all these potential markers are not yet considered useful for early detection of disease but may be valuable in terms of prognosis or for selecting patients for more aggressive therapeutic strategies.³⁰

As is obvious from the above, there is no single diagnostic technique capable of differentiating benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms or of predicting survival time. Even the most recent molecular techniques now being applied to the diagnosis, staging, and therapy of malignant neoplasia in humans have their limitations. All the ancillary tests developed to date should be considered just that—ancillary to the well-established and more traditional examination routines used in diagnostic pathology.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Pathogenesis Clinical Features Gross Pathology Histopathologic Variants Cytopathologic Variants Additional Diagnostic Techniques Future Diagnostics References

 

1. Acland GM, McLean IW, Aguirre GD, Trucksa R: Diffuse iris melanoma in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 176:52-56, 1980[Medline]
2. Ahmed I: Malignant melanoma: prognostic indicators. Mayo Clin Proc 72:356-361, 1997[Abstract]
3. Akutsu Y, Jimbow K: Development and characterization of a mouse monoclonal antibody, MoAb HMSA-1, against a melanosomal fraction of human malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 46:2904-2911, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Almeida MM, Nunes AM, Frable WJ: Malignant melanoma of soft tissue. A report of three cases with diagnosis by fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 38:241-246, 1994[Medline]
5. Andre JP, Delverdier M, Cabanie P, Bartel G: Malignant melanoma in an African Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus erithacus). J Assoc Avian Vet 7:83-85, 1993
6. Angeli S, Koelma IA, Fleuren GJ, Van Steenis GJ: Malignant melanoma in fine needle aspirates and effusions. An immunocytochemical study using monoclonal antibodies. Acta Cytol 32:707-712, 1988[Medline]
7. Aronsohn MG, Carpenter JL: Distal extremity melanocytic nevi and malignant melanomas in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 26:605-612, 1990
8. Baker JR, Leyland A: Histological survey of tumours in the horse, with particular reference to those of the skin. Vet Rec 96:419-422, 1975[Abstract]
9. Baker R, Lumsden JH: The skin. In: Color Atlas of Cytology of the Dog and Cat, ed. Baker R, and Lumsden JH, pp 39-70, Mosby, Inc, St Louis, MO 1999
10. Baker R, Lumsden JH: The head and neck—oropharynx, tonsils, salivary gland and thyroid. In: Color Atlas of Cytology of the Dog and Cat, ed. Baker R, and Lumsden JH, pp 117-130, Mosby, Inc, St Louis, MO 1999
11. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, Atkins MB, Cascinelli N, Coit DG, Fleming ID, Gershenwald JE, Houghton A Jr, Kirkwood JM, McMasters KM, Mihm MF, Morton DL, Reintgen DS, Ross MI, Sober A, Thompson JA, Thompson JF: Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 19:3635-3648, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Bar-Eli M: Molecular mechanisms of melanoma metastasis. J Cell Physiol 173:275-278, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Barker BF, Carpenter WM, Daniels TE, Kahn MA, Leider AS, Lozada-Nur F, Lynch DP, Melrose R, Merrell P, Morton T, Peters E, Regezi JA, Richards SD, Rick GM, Rohrer MD, Slater L, Stewart JC, Tomich CE, Vickers RA, Wood NK, Young SK: Oral mucosal melanomas: the WESTOP Banff workshop proceedings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83:672-679, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Barnett KC, Platt H: Intraocular melanomata in the horse. Equine Vet J 10: (Suppl) 76-82, 1990
15. Basler GC, Fader DJ, Yahanda A, Sondak VK, Johnson TM: The utility of fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of melanoma metastatic to lymph nodes. J Am Acad Dermatol 36:403-408, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Beaty MW, Fetsch P, Wilder AM, Marincola F, Abati A: Effusion cytology of malignant melanoma. A morphologic and immunocytochemical analysis including application of the MART-1 antibody. Cancer 81:57-63, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Beck ER, Withrow SJ, McChesney AE, Richardson RC, Henderson RA, Norris AM, Caywood DD, Klausner JS, Harvey HJ, Holmberg DL: Canine tongue tumors: a retrospective review of 57 cases. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 22:525-532, 1986
18. Bellhorn RW, Henkind P: Intra-ocular malignant melanoma in domestic cats. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 89:321-333, 1970[Medline]
19. Ben Romdhane K, Khattech R, Ben Othman M, Gamoudi A, Ammar A, Cammoun M: Melanin production in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Histopathology 27:569-571, 1995[Medline]
20. Berrington AJ, Jimbow K, Haines DM: Immunohistochemical detection of melanoma-associated antigens on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded canine tumors. Vet Pathol 31:455-461, 1994[Abstract]
21. Bertoy RW, Brightman AH, Regan K: Intraocular melanoma with multiple metastases in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 192:87-89, 1988[Medline]
22. Betton A, Healy LN, English RV, Bunch SE: Atypical limbal melanoma in a cat. J Vet Intern Med 13:379-381, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Bizjak-Schwarzbartl M: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of metastases in the liver. Diagn Cytopathol 3:278-283, 1987[Medline]
24. Black WC, Wiggins C: Melanoma among southwestern American Indians. Cancer 55:2899-2902, 1985[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Bolon B, Calderwood-Mays MB, Hall BJ: Characteristics of canine melanomas and comparison of histology and DNA ploidy to their biologic behavior. Vet Pathol 27:96-102, 1990[Abstract]
26. Bostock DE: Prognosis after surgical excision of canine melanomas. Vet Pathol 16:32-40, 1979[Abstract]
27. Bottger D, Dowden RV, Kay PP: Complete spontaneous regression of cutaneous primary malignant melanoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:548-553, 1992[Medline]
28. Brantley MA Jr, Harbour JW: Deregulation of the Rb and p53 pathways in uveal melanoma. Am J Pathol 157:1795-1801, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Breslow A: Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 172:902-908, 1970[Medline]
30. Brochez L, Naeyaert JM: Serological markers for melanoma. Br J Dermatol 143:256-268, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Brodey RS: A clinical and pathologic study of 130 neoplasms of the mouth and pharynx in the dog. Am J Vet Res 21:787-812, 1960
32. Brodey RS: The biological behavior of canine oral and pharyngeal neoplasms. J Small Anim Pract 11:45-53, 1970[Medline]
33. Brodland DG: The life of a skin cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 72:475-478, 1997[Abstract]
34. Burchill SA, Bennett DC, Holmes A, Thody AJ: Tyrosinase expression and melanogenesis in melanotic and amelanotic B16 mouse melanoma cells. Pathobiology 59:335-339, 1991[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Bussanich NM, Dolman PJ, Rootman J, Dolman CL: Canine uveal melanomas: series and literature review. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 23:415-422, 1987
36. Byers HR, Bhawan J: Pathologic parameters in the diagnosis and prognosis of primary cutaneous melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 12:717-735, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Callender GR: Malignant melanotic tumors of the eye. A study of histologic types in 111 cases. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 36:131-142, 1931
38. Canella KA, Diwan BA, Gorelick PL, Donovan PJ, Sipowicz MA, Kasprzak KS, Weghorst CM, Snyderwine EG, Davis CD, Keefer LK, Kyrtopoulos SA, Hecht SS, Wang M, Anderson LM, Rice JM: Liver tumorigenesis by Helicobacter hepaticus: considerations of mechanism. In Vivo 10:285-292, 1996[Medline]
39. Cangiarella J, Symmans WF, Cohen JM, Goldenberg A, Shapiro RL, Waisman J: Malignant melanoma metastatic to the breast: a report of seven cases diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Cancer 84:160-162, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Cangiarella J, Symmans WF, Shapiro RL, Roses DF, Cohen JM, Chhieng D, Harris MN, Waisman J: Aspiration biopsy and the clinical management of patients with malignant melanoma and palpable regional lymph nodes. Cancer 90:162-166, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Char DH, Kroll SM, Stoloff A, Kaleta-Michaels S, Crawford JB, Miller TR, Howes EL, Ljung BM: Cytomorphometry of uveal melanoma. Comparison of fine needle aspiration biopsy samples with histologic sections. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 13:293-299, 1991[Medline]
42. Chénier S, Doré M: Oral malignant melanoma with osteoid formation in a dog. Vet Pathol 36:74-76, 1999[Abstract]
43. Cheville NF: Extracellular substances, pigments and crystals. In: Ultrastructural Pathology, ed. Cheville NF, 1st ed., pp 276-326, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA 1994
44. Chhieng DC, Cangiarella JF, Waisman J, Cohen JM: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of desmoplastic malignant melanoma metastatic to the parotid gland: case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 22:97-100, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Clark WH Jr, Elder DE, Guerry D: Dysplastic nevi and malignant melanoma. In: Pathology of the Skin, ed. Farmer ER, and Hood AF, pp 684-756, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT 1990
46. Clark WH Jr, Elder DE, Guerry D 4th, Braitman LE, Trock BJ, Schultz D, Synnestvedt M, Halpern AC: Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1893-1904, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Collinson PN, Peiffer RL: Clinical presentation, morphology, and behavior of primary choroidal melanomas in eight dogs. Prog Vet Comp Ophthalmol 3:158-164, 1993
48. Conroy JD: Melanocytic tumors of domestic animals. Arch Dermatol 96:372-380, 1967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Cook CS, Rosenkrantz W, Peiffer RL, MacMillan A: Malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 186:505-506, 1985[Medline]
50. Cotchin E: Melanotic tumors of dogs. J Comp Path Ther 65:115-129, 1955
51. Cotchin E: Tumours in farm animals: a survey of tumours examined at the Royal Veterinary College, London, during 1950–60. Vet Rec 72:816-823, 1960
52. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Collins T: The female breast. In: Robbins Pathological Basis of Disease, ed. Cotran RS, 6th ed., pp 1093-1119, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 1999
53. Croxatto JO, Herrera HD, Lightowler CH: Malignant melanoma arising from primary acquired melanosis in a dog. Canine Pract 17:22-24, 1992
54. Cui J, Chen D, Misfeldt ML, Swinfard RW, Bystryn JC: Antimelanoma antibodies in swine with spontaneously regressing melanoma. Pigment Cell Res 8:60-63, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
55. Dardick I: Handbook of Diagnostic Electron Microscopy for Pathologists-in-Training. pp 3.8-3.9, Igaku-Shoin Medical Publishers, Inc, Tokyo, Japan 1996
56. Davidson HJ, Blanchard GL, Wheeler CA, Render JA: Anterior uveal melanoma, with secondary keratitis, cataract, and glaucoma, in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 199:1049-1050, 1991[Medline]
57. Day MJ, Lucke VM: Melanocytic neoplasia in the cat. J Small Anim Pract 36:207-213, 1995[Medline]
58. De Las Casas LE, Raso DS, Baird DB, Silverman JF: FNA of malignant melanoma: a brown stain without brown stains? Diagn Cytopathol 19:151-152, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
59. Deerberg F, Knup F, Rehm S: Spontaneous epithelial tumours of the skin in Han:WIST- and DA/Han rats. Z Versuchstierkd 28:45-57, 1986[Medline]
60. Diters RW, Dubielzig RR, Aguirre GD, Acland GM: Primary ocular melanoma in dogs. Vet Pathol 20:379-395, 1983[Abstract]
61. Diters RW, Walsh KM: Canine cutaneous clear cell melanomas: a report of three cases. Vet Pathol 21:355-356, 1984[Medline]
62. Dixon PM, Head KW: Equine nasal and paranasal sinus tumours: part 2: a contribution of 28 case reports. Vet J 157:279-294, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
63. Dooley TP: Recent advances in cutaneous melanoma oncogenesis research. Oncol Res 6:1-9, 1994[Medline]
64. Dorn CR, Priester WA: Epidemiologic analysis of oral and pharyngeal cancer in dogs, cats, horses, and cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 169:1202-1206, 1976[Medline]
65. Dubielzig RR: Ocular neoplasia in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 20:837-848, 1990[Medline]
66. Dubielzig RR, Aguirre GD, Gross SL, Diters RW: Choroidal melanomas in dogs. Vet Pathol 22:582-585, 1985[Abstract]
67. Dugan SJ: Ocular neoplasia. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 8:609-626, 1992[Medline]
68. Duncan DE, Peiffer RL: Morphology and behavior of anterior uveal melanomas in cats. Prog Vet Com Ophthalmol 12:25-32, 1991
69. Dunstan RW, Rosser EJ: Comparative aspects of cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms in the dog. Comp Dermatopathol 7:197-201, 1985
70. Eisen D, Voorhees JJ: Oral melanoma and other pigmented lesions of the oral cavity. J Am Acad Dermatol 24:527-537, 1991[Medline]
71. Elder DE, Murphy GF: Malignant tumors and related lesions. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Melanocytic Tumors of the Skin, ed. Rosai J, pp 166-198, AFIP, Washington, DC 1991
72. Eneroth CM: Malignant melanoma of the oral cavity. Int J Oral Surg 4:191-197, 1975[Medline]
73. Engle CG, Brodey RS: A retrospective study of 395 feline neoplasms. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 5:21-31, 1967
74. Feeney-Burns L, Burns RP, Gao CL: Ocular pathology in melanomatous Sinclair miniature swine. Am J Pathol 131:62-72, 1988[Abstract]
75. Flanders E, Kornstein MJ, Wakely PE, Kardos TF, Frable WJ: Lymphoglandular bodies in fine-needle aspiration cytology smears. Am J Clin Pathol 99:566-569, 1993[Medline]
76. Fournel-Fleury C, Magnol J-P, Guelfi J-F: Color atlas of cancer cytology of the dog and cat. Conférence Nationale des Vétérinaires Spécialisés en Petits Animaux, Paris, France, pp 34-50, 1994
77. Fournel-Fleury C, Magnol J-P, Guelfi J-F: Color atlas of cancer cytology of the dog and cat. Conférence Nationale des Vétérinaires Spécialisés en Petits Animaux, Paris, France, pp 83-84, 126:1994
78. Fournel-Fleury C, Magnol J-P, Guelfi J-F: Color atlas of cancer cytology of the dog and cat. Conférence Nationale des Vétérinaires Spécialisés en Petits Animaux, Paris, France, pp 216-219, 1994
79. Fournel-Fleury C, Magnol J-P, Guelfi J-F: Color atlas of cancer cytology of the dog and cat. Conférence Nationale des Vétérinaires Spécialisés en Petits Animaux, Paris, France, pp 257276-283, 1994
80. Frese K: Developmental studies on melanoma of the skin and mouth mucosa of dogs. Vet Pathol 15:461-473, 1978 [In German][Abstract]
81. Friedman DS, Miller L, Dubielzig RR: Malignant canine anterior uveal melanoma. Vet Pathol 26:523-525, 1989[Medline]
82. Friedman M, Rao U, Fox S: The cytology of metastatic balloon cell melanoma. Acta Cytol 26:39-43, 1982[Medline]
83. Gelatt KN, Johnson KA, Peiffer RL Jr: Primary iridal pigmented masses in three dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 15:339-344, 1979
84. Gilger BC, McLaughlin SA, Whitley RD, Wright JC: Orbital neoplasms in cats: 21 cases (1974–1990). J Am Vet Med Assoc 201:1083-1086, 1992[Medline]
85. Giuliano EA, Chappell R, Fischer B, Dubielzig RR: A matched observational study of canine survival with primary intraocular melanocytic neoplasia. Vet Ophthalmol 2:185-190, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
86. Goldschmidt MH: Benign and malignant melanocytic neoplasms of domestic animals. Am J Dermatopathol 7: (Suppl) 203-212, 1985
87. Goldschmidt MH: Pigmented lesions of the skin. Clin Dermatol 12:507-514, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]
88. Goldschmidt MH, Dunstan RW, Stannard AA, von Tscharner C, Walder EJ, Yager JA: Melanocytic tumors and tumor-like lesions. In: Histological Classification of Epithelial and Melanocytic Tumors of the Skin of Domestic Animals, ed. Goldschmidt MH, Dunstan RW, Stannard AA, von Tscharner C, Walder EJ, and Yager JA, pp 38-40, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 1998
89. Goldschmidt MH, Liu S-S, Shofer FS: Feline dermal melanoma: a retrospective study. In Advances in Veterinary Dermatology ed. Ihrke PJ, Mason IS, and White SD vol. 2: pp 285-292, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK 1993
90. Goldschmidt MH, Shofer FS: Skin Tumors of the Dog and Cat. pp 142-151, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK 1992
91. Goodison S, Urquidi V, Tarin D: CD44 cell adhesion molecules. Mol Pathol 52:189-196, 1999[Abstract]
92. Gorham S, Robl M: Melanoma in the gray horse: the darker side of equine aging. Vet Med 81:446-448, 1986
93. Gorlin RJ, Barron CN, Chaudhry AP, Clark JJ: The oral and pharyngeal pathology of domestic animals: a study of 487 cases. Am J Vet Res 20:1032-1061, 1959
94. Goubran GF, Adekeye EO, Edwards MB: Melanoma of the face and mouth in Nigeria. A review and comment on three cases. Int J Oral Surg 7:453-462, 1978[Medline]
95. Gown AM, Vogel AM, Hoak D, Gough F, McNutt MA: Monoclonal antibodies specific for melanocytic tumors distinguish subpopulations of melanocytes. Am J Pathol 123:195-203, 1986[Abstract]
96. Green A, Neale R, Kelly R, Smith I, Ablett E, Meyers B, Parsons P: An animal model for human melanoma. Photochem Photobiol 64:577-580, 1996[Medline]
97. Greene JF Jr, Morgan CD, Rao A, Amoss MS Jr, Arguello F: Regression by differentiation in the Sinclair swine model of cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res 7:471-477, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
98. Greene JF Jr, Townsend JS 4th, Amoss MS Jr: Histopathology of regression in sinclair swine model of melanoma. Lab Invest 71:17-24, 1994[Medline]
99. Greene MH: Genetics of cutaneous melanoma and nevi. Mayo Clin Proc 72:467-474, 1997[Abstract]
100. Greene MH: The genetics of hereditary melanoma and nevi. 1998 update. Cancer 86:2464-2477, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
101. Griffiths GL, Lumsden JH: Fine needle aspiration cytology and histologic correlation in canine tumors. Vet Clin Pathol 13:13-17, 1984[Medline]
102. Gross TL, Ihrke PJ, Walder EJ: Melanocytic tumors. In: Veterinary Dermatopathology, ed. Gross TL, Ihrke PJ, and Walder EJ, pp 459-464, Mosby, Inc, St Louis, MO 1992
103. Guo Y, Ma J, Wang J, Che X, Narula J, Bigby M, Wu M, Sy MS: Inhibition of human melanoma growth and metastasis in vivo by anti-CD44 monoclonal antibody. Cancer Res 54:1561-1565, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
104. Gupta SK, Rajwanshi AK, Das DK: Fine needle aspiration cytology smear patterns of malignant melanoma. Acta Cytol 29:983-988, 1985[Medline]
105. Hahn KA, Bravo L, Adams WH, Frazier DL: Naturally occurring tumors in dogs as comparative models for cancer therapy research. In Vivo 8:133-143, 1994[Medline]
106. Hamor RE, Severin GA, Roberts SM: Intraocular melanoma in an alpaca. Vet Ophthalmol 2:193-196, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
107. Harris BP, Dubielzig RR: Atypical primary ocular melanoma in cats. Vet Ophthalmol 2:121-124, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
108. Harvey HJ, MacEwan EG, Braun D, Patnaik AK, Withrow SJ, Jongeward S: Prognostic criteria for dogs with oral melanoma. J Am Vet Med Assoc 178:580-582, 1981[Medline]
109. Hirschberger J, DeNicola DB, Hermanns W, Kraft W: Sensitivity and specificity of cytologic evaluation in the diagnosis of neoplasia in body fluids from dogs and cats. Vet Clin Pathol 28:142-146, 1999[Medline]
110. Honnas CM, Liskey CC, Meagher DM, Brown D, Luck EE: Malignant melanoma in the foot of a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 197:756-758, 1990[Medline]
111. Hook RR, Berkelhammer J, Oxenhandler RW: Melanoma: Sinclair swine melanoma. Am J Pathol 108:130-133, 1982[Medline]
112. Horsting N, Wohlsein P, Reimann N, Bartnitzke S, Bullerdiek J, Nolte I: Cytogenetic analysis of three oropharyngeal malignant melanomas in dogs. Res Vet Sci 67:149-151, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
113. Hsu MY, Meier FE, Nesbit M, Hsu JY, Van Belle P, Elder DE, Herlyn M: E-cadherin expression in melanoma cells restores keratinocyte-mediated growth control and down-regulates expression of invasion-related adhesion receptors. Am J Pathol 156:1515-1525, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
114. Hsueh EC, Lucci A, Qi K, Morton DL: Survival of patients with melanoma of the lower extremity decreases with distance from the trunk. Cancer 85:383-388, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
115. Huang S, Ullrich SE, Bar-Eli M: Regulation of tumor growth and metastasis by interleukin-10: the melanoma experience. J Interferon Cytokine Res 19:697-703, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
116. Innes DJ, Feldman PS: Comparison of diagnostic results obtained by fine needle aspiration cytology and tru-cut or open biopsies. Acta Cytol 27:350-354, 1983[Medline]
117. Izban KF, Candel AG, Hsi ED, Selvaggi SM: Metastatic melanoma of the vulva identified by peritoneal fluid cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 20:152-155, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
118. Jakobiec FA, Folberg R, Iwamoto T: Clinicopathologic characteristics of premalignant and malignant melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva. Ophthalmology 96:147-166, 1989[Medline]
119. Jerbi G, Boussen H, Ennaifer-Jerbi E, Karboul S, Osman A, Rahal K: Melanoma arising in burn scars: report of 3 observations and a literature review. Arch Dermatol 135:1551-1553, 1999[Free Full Text]
120. Johnson PJ: Dermatologic tumors (excluding sarcoids). Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 14:625-658, 1998[Medline]
121. Johnston WW: The malignant pleural effusion. A review of cytopathologic diagnoses of 584 specimens from 472 consecutive patients. Cancer 56:905-909, 1985[CrossRef][Medline]
122. Kahn HJ, Marks A, Thom H, Baumal R: Role of antibody to S100 protein in diagnostic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 79:341-347, 1983[Medline]
123. Kalishman JB, Chappell R, Flood LA, Dubielzig RR: A matched observational study of survival in cats with enucleation due to diffuse iris melanoma. Vet Ophthalmol 1:25-29, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
124. Kirker-Head CA, Loeffler D, Held JP: Pelvic limb lameness due to malignant melanoma in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 186:1215-1217, 1985[Medline]
125. Kobayashi G, Cobb C: A case of amelanotic spindle-cell melanoma presenting as metastases to breast and axillary lymph node: diagnosis by FNA cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 22:246-249, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
126. Koenig A, Wojcieszyn J, Weeks BR, Modiano JF: Expression of S100a, vimentin, NSE, and Melan A/MART-1 in seven canine melanoma cell lines and twenty-nine retrospective cases of canine melanoma. Vet Pathol 38:427-435, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
127. Koh HK: Cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med 325:171-182, 1991[Medline]
128. Koren R, Bernheim J, Schachter P, Schwartz A, Siegal A, Gal R: Black thyroid adenoma. Clinical, histochemical, and ultrastructural features. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 8:80-84, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
129. Kufuor-Mensah E, Watson GL: Malignant melanomas in a penguin (Eudyptes chrysolphus) and a red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). Vet Pathol 29:354-356, 1992[Medline]
130. Kunze DJ, Monticello TM, Jakob TP, Crane S: Malignant melanoma of the coronary band in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 188:297-298, 1986[Medline]
131. Lai R, Redburn J, Nguyen GK: Cytodiagnosis of metastatic amelanotic melanomas by fine-needle aspiration biopsy: adjunctival value of immunocytochemistry and electron microscopy. Cancer 84:92-97, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
132. Langenbach A, McManus PM, Hendrick MJ, Shofer FS, Sorenmo KU: Sensitivity and specificity of methods of assessing the regional lymph nodes for evidence of metastasis in dogs and cats with solid tumors. J Am Vet Med Assoc 218:1424-1428, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
133. Laprie C, Abadie J, Amardeilh MF, Net JL, Lagadic M, Delverdier M: MIB-1 immunoreactivity correlates with biologic behaviour in canine cutaneous melanoma. Vet Dermatol 12:139-147, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
134. Lazar-Molnar E, Hegyesi H, Toth S, Falus A: Autocrine and paracrine regulation by cytokines and growth factors in melanoma. Cytokine 12:547-554, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
135. Lentz KJ, Burns RP, Loeffler K, Feeney-Burns L, Berkelhammer J, Hook RR Jr: Uveitis caused by cytotoxic immune response to cutaneous malignant melanoma in swine: destruction of uveal melanocytes during tumor regression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:1063-1069, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
136. Lerner AB, Cage GW: Melanomas in horses. Yale J Biol Med 46:646-649, 1973[Medline]
137. Levene A: Equine melanotic disease. Tumori 57:133-168, 1971[Medline]
138. Li G, Herlyn M: Dynamics of intercellular communication during melanoma development. Mol Med Today 6:163-169, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
139. Lin EY, Piepkorn M, Garcia R, Byrd D, Tsou R, Isik FF: Angiogenesis and vascular growth factor receptor expression in malignant melanoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1666-1674, 1999[Medline]
140. Lindblom A, Liljegren A: Regular review: tumour markers in malignancies. Br J Dermatol 143:256-268, 2000
141. Lioe TF, Elliott H, Allen DC, Spence RA: The role of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the investigation of superficial lymphadenopathy; uses and limitations of the technique. Cytopathology 10:291-297, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
142. Loganzo F Jr, Dosik JS, Zhao Y, Vidal MJ, Nanus DM, Sudol M, Albino AP: Elevated expression of protein tyrosine kinase c-Yes, but not c-Src, in human malignant melanoma. Oncogene 8:2637-2644, 1993[Medline]
143. Longatto Filho A, de Carvalho LV, Santos Gda C, Oyafuso MS, Lombardo V, Bortolan J, Neves JI: Cytologic diagnosis of melanoma in serous effusions. A morphologic and immunocytochemical study. Acta Cytol 39:481-484, 1995[Medline]
144. Luna LD, Higginbotham ML, Henry CJ, Turnquist SE: Feline non-ocular melanoma: a retrospective study of 23 cases (1991–1999). J Feline Med Surg 2:173-181, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
145. MacEwen EG: Spontaneous tumors in dogs and cats: models for the study of cancer biology and treatment. Cancer Metastasis Rev 9:125-136, 1990[CrossRef][Medline]
146. MacKie RM: Malignant melanoma: clinical variants and prognostic indicators. Clin Exp Dermatol 25:471-475, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
147. Marcus JN, Dise CA, LiVolsi VA: Melanin production in a medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 49:2518-2526, 1982[CrossRef][Medline]
148. Marino DJ, Matthiesen DT, Stefanacci JD, Moroff SD: Evaluation of dogs with digit masses: 117 cases (1981–1991). J Am Vet Med Assoc 207:726-728, 1995[Medline]
149. Matthews AG, Barry DR: Bilateral melanoma of the iris in a horse. Equine Vet J 19:358-360, 1987[Medline]
150. McFadyean S: Equine melanomatosis. J Comp Med 46:186-204, 1933
151. Meier F, Nesbit M, Hsu MY, Martin B, Van Belle P, Elder DE, Schaumburg-Lever G, Garbe C, Walz TM, Donatien P, Crombleholme TM, Herlyn M: Human melanoma progression in skin reconstructs: biological significance of bFGF. Am J Pathol 156:193-200, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
152. Meier F, Satyamoorthy K, Nesbit M, Hsu MY, Schittek B, Garbe C, Herlyn M: Molecular events in melanoma development and progression. Front Biosci 3:D1005-D1010, 1998[Medline]
153. Meleo KA: Tumors of the skin and associated structures. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 27:73-94, 1997[Medline]
154. Miller MA, Weaver AD, Stogsdill PL, Fischer JR: Cutaneous melanocytomas in 10 young cattle. Vet Pathol 32:479-484, 1995[Abstract]
155. Miller WH, Scott DW, Anderson WI: Feline cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms: a retrospective analysis of 43 cases (1979–1991). Vet Dermatol 4:19-26, 1993
156. Millikan LE, Boylon JL, Hook RR, Manning PJ: Melanoma in Sinclair swine: a new animal model. J Invest Dermatol 62:20-30, 1974[CrossRef][Medline]
157. Milne JC: Malignant melanomas causing Horner's syndrome in a horse. Equine Vet J 18:74-75, 1986[Medline]
158. Minami T, Patnaik AK: Malignant anterior uveal melanoma with diffuse metastasis in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 201:1894-1896, 1992[Medline]
159. Mitteldorf CA, Alves VA, Kanamura CT, Carneiro PC: Immunocytochemistry applied to aspiration biopsy cytology. Diagnostic contribution in 100 cases of previously stained, routine specimens. Acta Cytol 43:218-226, 1999[Medline]
160. Modiano JF, Ritt MG, Wojcieszyn J: The molecular basis of canine melanoma: pathogenesis and trends in diagnosis and therapy. J Vet Intern Med 13:163-174, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
161. Modiano JF, Ritt MG, Wojcieszyn J, Smith R 3rd: Growth arrest of melanoma cells is differentially regulated by contact inhibition and serum deprivation. DNA Cell Biol 18:357-367, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
162. Morales-Ducret CR, van de Rijn M, LeBrun DP, Smoller BR: bcl-2 expression in primary malignancies of the skin. Arch Dermatol 131:909-912, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
163. Morgan CD, Measel JW Jr, Amoss MS Jr, Rao A, Greene JF Jr: Immunophenotypic characterization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and peripheral blood lymphocytes isolated from melanomatous and non-melanomatous Sinclair miniature swine. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 55:189-203, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
164. Morgan RV, Patton CS: Choroidal melanoma in a dog. Cornell Vet 83:211-217, 1993[Medline]
165. Mowlavi A, Malafa MP: Angiogenesis in primary tumor cells of metastatic and nonmetastatic malignant melanoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:514, 2000[Medline]
166. Mulligan RM: Melanoblastic tumors in the dog. Am J Vet Res 22:345-351, 1961[Medline]
167. Murray MJ, Cavey DM, Feldman BF, Trostle SS, White NA: Signs of sympathetic denervation associated with a thoracic melanoma in a horse. J Vet Intern Med 11:199-203, 1997[Medline]
168. Murty TS, Rao MN, Rao TB: Malignant melanoma in a crossbred Jersey cow—a case report. Indian Vet J 72:1309, 1995
169. Nakajima T, Watanabe S, Sato Y, Kameya T, Hirota T, Shimosato Y: An immunoperoxidase study of S-100 protein distribution in normal and neoplastic tissues. Am J Surg Pathol 6:715-727, 1982[Medline]
170. Nakhleh RE, Wick MR, Rocamora A, Swanson PE, Dehner LP: Morphologic diversity in malignant melanomas. Am J Clin Pathol 93:731-740, 1990[Medline]
171. Nasiell K, Tani E, Skoog L: Fine needle aspiration cytology and immunocytochemistry of metastatic melanoma. Cytopathology 2:137-147, 1991[Medline]
172. Neitzel LT, Neitzel CD, Magee KL, Malafa MP: Angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 6:70-74, 1999[Abstract]
173. Neubauer A, Thalmann U, Musch R, Grosser H, Loddenkemper R, Huhn D: Prospective comparison of the diagnostic value of cytology and immunocytology in pleural effusion studied by thoracoscopy and biopsy. Klin Wochenschr 65:400-406, 1987[CrossRef][Medline]
174. Niemann TH, Thomas PA: Melanoma with signet-ring cells in a peritoneal effusion. Diagn Cytopathol 12:241-244, 1995[Medline]
175. Oakes MG, Lewis DD, Hedlund CS, Hosgood G: Canine oral neoplasia. Comp Contin Educ Pract Vet 15:15-30, 1993
176. Oliver JL 3rd, Wolfe LG: Antigen expression in canine tissues, recognized by a monoclonal antibody generated against canine melanoma cells. Am J Vet Res 53:123-128, 1992[Medline]
177. Orchard GE: Comparison of immunohistochemical labelling of melanocyte differentiation antibodies melan-A, tyrosinase and HMB 45 with NKIC3 and S100 protein in the evaluation of benign naevi and malignant melanoma. Histochem J 32:475-481, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
178. Oxenhandler RW, Adelstein EH, Haigh JP, Hook RR Jr, Clark WH Jr: Malignant melanoma in the Sinclair miniature swine: an autopsy study of 60 cases. Am J Pathol 96:707-720, 1979[Abstract]
179. Oxenhandler RW, Berkelhammer J, Smith GD, Hook RR Jr: Growth and regression of cutaneous melanomas in Sinclair miniature swine. Am J Pathol 109:259-269, 1982[Abstract]
180. Parsons PG, Takahashi H, Candy J, Meyers B, Vickers J, Kelly WR, Smith I, Spradbrow P: Histopathology of melanocytic lesions in goats and establishment of a melanoma cell line: a potential model for human melanoma. Pigment Cell Res 3:297-305, 1990[CrossRef][Medline]
181. Pathak S, Multani AS, McConkey DJ, Imam AS, Amoss MS Jr: Spontaneous regression of cutaneous melanoma in sinclair swine is associated with defective telomerase activity and extensive telomere erosion. Int J Oncol 17:1219-1224, 2000[Medline]
182. Patnaik AK, Mooney S: Feline melanoma: a comparative study of ocular, oral, and dermal neoplasms. Vet Pathol 25:105-112, 1988[Abstract]
183. Perniciaro C: Dermatopathologic variants of malignant melanoma. Mayo Clin Proc 72:273-279, 1997[Abstract]
184. Perry MD, Gore M, Seigler HF, Johnston WW: Fine needle aspiration biopsy of metastatic melanoma. A morphologic analysis of 174 cases. Acta Cytol 30:385-396, 1986[Medline]
185. Perry MD, Seigler HF, Johnston WW: Diagnosis of metastatic malignant melanoma by fine needle aspiration biopsy: a clinical and pathologic correlation of 298 cases. J Natl Cancer Inst 77:1013-1021, 1986
186. Prehn RT: The paradoxical association of regression with a poor prognosis in melanoma contrasted with a good prognosis in keratoacanthoma. Cancer Res 56:937-940, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
187. Pulley LT, Stannard AA: Tumors of the skin and soft tissues. In: Tumors in Domestic Animals, ed. Moulton JE, 3rd ed., pp 75-82, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA 1990
188. Rabanal RH, Fondevila DM, Montane V, Domingo M, Ferrer L: Immunocytochemical diagnosis of skin tumours of the dog with special reference to undifferentiated types. Res Vet Sci 47:129-133, 1989[Medline]
189. Ramaekers F, Haag D, Jap P, Vooijs PG: Immunochemical demonstration of keratin and vimentin in cytologic aspirates. Acta Cytol 28:385-392, 1984[Medline]
190. Ramos-Vara JA, Beissenherz ME, Miller MA, Johnson GC, Pace LW, Fard A, Kottler SJ: Retrospective study of 338 canine oral melanomas with clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical review of 129 cases. Vet Pathol 37:597-608, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
191. Ramos-Vara JA, Miller MA, Johnson GC, Turnquist SE, Kreeger JM, Watson GL: Melan A and S100 protein immunohistochemistry in feline melanomas: 48 cases. Vet Pathol 39:127-132, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
192. Reddy KP, Ramakrishna A, Reddy GCN: Malignant melanoma in a dark skinned bull. Indian Vet J 75:453-454, 1998
193. Reddy KP, Subbaraja S: Malignant melanoma in a bullock. Indian Vet J 73:874-875, 1996
194. Richerson JT, Burns RP, Misfeldt ML: Association of uveal melanocyte destruction in melanoma-bearing swine with large granular lymphocyte cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:2455-2460, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
195. Rigel DS, Rivers JK, Kopf AW, Friedman RJ, Vinokur AF, Heilman ER, Levenstein M: Dysplastic nevi. Markers for increased risk for melanoma. Cancer 63:386-389, 1989[CrossRef][Medline]
196. Ritt MG, Wojcieszyn J, Modiano JF: Functional loss of p21/Waf-1 in a case of benign canine multicentric melanoma. Vet Pathol 35:94-101, 1998[Abstract]
197. Rodrigues LK, Leong SP, Ljung BM, Sagebiel RW, Burnside N, Hu TI, Ng BW, Miller JR 3rd, Kashani-Sabet M: Fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:735-740, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
198. Rodriguez F, Forga J, Herraez P, Andrada M, Fernandez A: Metastatic melanoma causing spinal cord compression in a horse. Vet Rec 142:248-249, 1998[Medline]
199. Roels S, Ducatelle R: Malignant melanoma of the nictitating membrane in a cat (Felis vulgaris). J Comp Pathol 119:189-193, 1998[Medline]
200. Roels S, Tilmant K, Ducatelle R: PCNA and Ki67 proliferation markers as criteria for prediction of clinical behaviour of melanocytic tumours in cats and dogs. J Comp Pathol 121:13-24, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
201. Roels S, Tilmant K, Ducatelle R: P53 expression and apoptosis in melanomas of dogs and cats. Res Vet Sci 70:19-25, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
202. Roels S, Tilmant K, Van Daele A, Van Marck E, Ducatelle R: Proliferation, DNA ploidy, p53 overexpression and nuclear DNA fragmentation in six equine melanocytic tumours. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 47:439-448, 2000[Medline]
203. Rogers RS 3rd, Gibson LE: Mucosal, genital, and unusual clinical variants of melanoma. Mayo Clin Proc 72:362-366, 1997[Abstract]
204. Rollins SD, Berardo MD: Presence of nuclear grooves in the cytology of malignant melanoma. Diagn Cytopathol 19:309-312, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
205. Rudzki Z, Jothy S: CD44 and the adhesion of neoplastic cells. Mol Pathol 50:57-71, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
206. Ryan AM, Diters RW: Clinical and pathologic features of canine ocular melanomas. J Am Vet Med Assoc 184:60-67, 1984[Medline]
207. Saleh FH, Crotty KA, Hersey P, Menzies SW: Primary melanoma tumour regression associated with an immune response to the tumour-associated antigen melan-A/MART-1. Int J Cancer 94:551-557, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
208. Sanders DS, Blessing K, Hassan GA, Bruton R, Marsden JR, Jankowski J: Alterations in cadherin and catenin expression during the biological progression of melanocytic tumours. Mol Pathol 52:151-157, 1999[Abstract]
209. Sandusky GE Jr, Carlton WW, Wightman KA: Diagnostic immunohistochemistry of canine round cell tumors. Vet Pathol 24:495-499, 1987[Abstract]
210. Sandusky GE Jr, Carlton WW, Wightman KA: Immunohistochemical staining for S100 protein in the diagnosis of canine amelanotic melanoma. Vet Pathol 22:577-581, 1985[Abstract]
211. Schoster JV, Dubielzig RR, Sullivan L: Choroidal melanoma in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 203:89-91, 1993[Medline]
212. Schott HC, Major MD, Grant BD, Bayly WM: Melanoma as a cause of spinal cord compression in two horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 196:1820-1822, 1990[Medline]
213. Scott DW: Neoplastic Diseases. In: Large Animal Dermatology, ed. Pederson D, pp 448-452, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 1988
214. Sears D, Hajdu SI: The cytologic diagnosis of malignant neoplasms in pleural and peritoneal effusions. Acta Cytol 31:85-97, 1987[Medline]
215. Seiter S, Schadendorf D, Herrmann K, Schneider M, Rosel M, Arch R, Tilgen W, Zoller M: Expression of CD44 variant isoforms in malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2:447-456, 1996[Abstract]
216. Shull RM, Maddux JM: Subcutaneous tissue: mammary, salivary, thyroid, and parathyroid. In: Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology of the Dog and Cat, ed. Cowell RL, Tyler RD, and Meinkoth JH, 2nd ed., pp 93-94, Mosby, St Louis, MO 1999
217. Singh ZN, Ray R, Kumar N, Aron M, Gupta SD: Medullary thyroid carcinoma with melanin production—a case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 42:159-163, 1999[Medline]
218. Slominski A, Wortsman J, Carlson AJ, Matsuoka LY, Balch CM, Mihm MC: Malignant melanoma: an update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:1295-1306, 2001[Medline]
219. Sneath RJ, Mangham DC: The normal structure and function of CD44 and its role in neoplasia. Mol Pathol 51:191-200, 1998[Abstract]
220. Stebbins KE, Morse CC, Goldschmidt MH: Feline oral neoplasia: a ten-year survey. Vet Pathol 26:121-128, 1989[Abstract]
221. Strafuss AC, Dommert AR, Tumbleson ME, Middleton CC: Cutaneous melanoma in miniature swine. Lab Anim Care 18:165-169, 1968[Medline]
222. Su WP: Malignant melanoma: basic approach to clinicopathologic correlation. Mayo Clin Proc 72:267-272, 1997[Abstract]
223. Suliamon S, Ehrhart E, Kitchell B: Immunohistochemical detection of canine melanomas with HMB-45. Vet Pathol 36:496, 1999
224. Sundberg JP, Burnstein T, Page EH, Kirkham WW, Robinson FR: Neoplasms of equidae. J Am Vet Med Assoc 170:150-152, 1977[Medline]
225. Sweeney CR, Gillette DM: Thoracic neoplasia in equids: 35 cases (1967–1987). J Am Vet Med Assoc 195:374-377, 1989[Medline]
226. Takenouchi T, Ito K, Kazama T, Ito M: Establishment and characterization of a clear-cell sarcoma (malignant melanoma of soft parts) cell line. Arch Dermatol Res 286:254-260, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]
227. Talley LI, Soong S, Harrison RA, McCarthy WH, Urist MM, Balch CM: Clinical outcomes of localized melanoma of the foot: a case-control study. J Clin Epidemiol 51:853-857, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
228. Tarrant J, Stokol T, Bartol J, Wakshlag J, Blue J: Diagnosis of malignant melanoma in a horse from cytology of body cavity fluid and blood. Equine Vet J 33:531-534, 2001[Medline]
229. Thirloway L, Rudolph R, Leipold HW: Malignant melanomas in a Duroc boar. J Am Vet Med Assoc 130:345-347, 1977
230. Thompson SW: Histochemical methods for the demonstration of endogenous and exogenous pigments. In: Selected Histochemical and Histopathological Methods, pp 1284-1285, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL 1966
231. Tietze MK, Chin L: Murine models of malignant melanoma. Mol Med Today 6:408-410, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
232. Todoroff RJ, Brodey RS: Oral and pharyngeal neoplasia in the dog: a retrospective survey of 361 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 175:567-571, 1979[Medline]
233. Trosko JE: Commentary: is the concept of "tumor promotion" a useful paradigm? Mol Carcinog 30:131-137, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
234. Trucksa RC, McLean IW, Quinn AJ: Intraocular canine melanocytic neoplasms. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 21:85-88, 1985
235. Tsang WY, Chan JK, Chow LT: Signet-ring cell melanoma mimicking adenocarcinoma. A case report. Acta Cytol 37:559-562, 1993[Medline]
236. Tunev SS, Wells MG: Cutaneous melanoma in a ferret (Mustela putorius furo). Vet Pathol 39:141-143, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
237. Turbat-Herrera EA, Knowles K: Cytology: screening or diagnostic tool? Hum Pathol 29:1356-1366, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
238. Tyler RD, Cowell RL, Meinkoth JH: Cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions: masses, cysts, ulcers, and fistulous tracts. In: Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology of the Dog and Cat, ed. Cowell RL, Tyler RD, and Meinkoth JH, 2nd ed., p 48, Mosby, Inc, St Louis, MO 1999
239. Tyler RD, Cowell RL, Meinkoth JH: The oropharynx and tonsils. In: Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology of the Dog and Cat, ed. Cowell RL, Tyler RD, and Meinkoth JH, 2nd ed., pp 65-67, Mosby, Inc, St Louis, MO 1999
240. Ugurel S, Rappl G, Tilgen W, Reinhold U: Increased serum concentration of angiogenic factors in malignant melanoma patients correlates with tumor progression and survival. J Clin Oncol 19:577-583, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
241. Valentine BA: Equine melanocytic tumors: a retrospective study of 53 horses (1988 to 1991). J Vet Intern Med 9:291-297, 1995[Medline]
242. Valentine BA, McManus PM, Knox AM: Malignant transformation of a giant congenital pigmented nevus (hamartoma) in a dog. Vet Dermatol 10:127-130, 1999[CrossRef]
243. van der Linde-Sipman JS, de Wit MML, van Garderen E, Molenbeek RF, van der Velde-Zimmermann D, de Weger RA: Cutaneous malignant melanomas in 57 cats: identification of (amelanotic) signet-ring and balloon cell types and verification of their origin by immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and in situ hybridization. Vet Pathol 34:31-38, 1997[Abstract]
244. van Steeg H, Kraemer KH: Xeroderma pigmentosum and the role of UV-induced DNA damage in skin cancer. Mol Med Today 5:86-94, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
245. Vidal-Vanaclocha F, Fantuzzi G, Mendoza L, Fuentes AM, Anasagasti MJ, Martin J, Carrascal T, Walsh P, Reznikov LL, Kim SH, Novick D, Rubinstein M, Dinarello CA: IL-18 regulates IL-1beta–dependent hepatic melanoma metastasis via vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:734-739, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
246. Vielkind JR, Tron VA, Schmidt BM, Dougherty GJ, Ho VC, Woolcock BW, Sadaghiani B, Smith CJ: A putative marker for human melanoma. A monoclonal antibody derived from the melanoma gene in the Xiphophorus melanoma model. Am J Pathol 143:656-662, 1993[Abstract]
247. Voit C, Mayer T, Proebstle TM, Weber L, Kron M, Krupienski M, Zeelen U, Sterry W, Schoengen A: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the early detection of melanoma metastases. Cancer 90:186-193, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
248. Wahl RW, Van Pelt J: Malignant melanoma presenting as peritoneal effusion. J Tenn Med Assoc 70:563-565, 1977[Medline]
249. Welch DR, Goldberg SF: Molecular mechanisms controlling human melanoma progression and metastasis. Pathobiology 65:311-330, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
250. Weyers W, Euler M, Diaz-Cascajo C, Schill WB, Bonczkowitz M: Classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma: a reassessment of histopathologic criteria for the distinction of different types. Cancer 86:288-299, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
251. Whiteman DC, Parsons PG, Green AC: p53 expression and risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: a case-control study. Int J Cancer 77:843-848, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
252. Wiebe DE, Rang H: Malignant melanoma in sheep (illustrated case report). Tierarztl Umsch 33:676-678, 1978
253. Wilcock BP: The eye and ear. In: Pathology of Domestic Animals, ed. Jubb KVF, Kennedy PC, and Palmer N, 4th ed., pp 512-521, Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1992
254. Wilcock BP, Peiffer RL Jr: Morphology and behavior of primary ocular melanomas in 91 dogs. Vet Pathol 23:418-424, 1986[Abstract]
255. Woyke S, Domagala W, Czerniak B, Strokowska M: Fine needle aspiration cytology of malignant melanoma of the skin. Acta Cytol 24:529-538, 1980[Medline]
256. Yager JA, Scott DW: The skin and appendages. In: Pathology of Domestic Animals, ed. Jubb KVF, Kenenedy PC, and Palmer N, 4th ed vol. 1: pp 719-722, Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1993

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. E. Finocchiaro, M. D. Riveros, and G. C. Glikin Cytokine-enhanced vaccine and suicide gene therapy as adjuvant treatments of metastatic melanoma in a horse Vet Rec., February 28, 2009; 164(9): 278 - 279. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. H. Mollat, K. L. Gailbreath, and G. M. Orbell Metastatic malignant melanoma in an alpaca (Vicugna pacos) J Vet Diagn Invest, January 1, 2009; 21(1): 141 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. I. Hill and S. M. Hughes Osteogenic intraocular melanoma in an alpaca (Vicugna pacos) J Vet Diagn Invest, January 1, 2009; 21(1): 171 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Y. Kim, A. B. Royal, and J. A. Villamil Disseminated Melanoma in a Dog with Involvement of Leptomeninges and Bone Marrow Vet. Pathol., January 1, 2009; 46(1): 80 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Esplin Survival of Dogs Following Surgical Excision of Histologically Well-differentiated Melanocytic Neoplasms of the Mucous Membranes of the Lips and Oral Cavity Vet. Pathol., November 1, 2008; 45(6): 889 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kurotaki, Y. Tomonari, T. Kanno, Y. Wako, and M. Tsuchitani A Novel Immunohistochemical Marker of Normal and Neoplastic Melanocytes in Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Tissues of Albino Rats Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2008; 45(3): 383 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Mavangira, J. M. Hughes, J. R. Middleton, W. J. Mitchell, and D. Y. Kim Malignant melanoma of the horn base in a Pygora goat J Vet Diagn Invest, January 1, 2008; 20(1): 104 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Latendresse, L. Muskhelishvili, A. Warbritton, and W. H. Tolleson Two Cases of Uveal Amelanotic Melanoma in Transgenic Tyr-HRAS+ Ink4a/Arf Heterozygous Mice Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2007; 35(6): 825 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. von Bomhard, M. H. Goldschmidt, F. S. Shofer, L. Perl, K. L. Rosenthal, and E. A. Mauldin Cutaneous Neoplasms in Pet Rabbits: A Retrospective Study Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 44(5): 579 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Avallone, P. Helmbold, M. Caniatti, D. Stefanello, R. C. Nayak, and P. Roccabianca The Spectrum of Canine Cutaneous Perivascular Wall Tumors: Morphologic, Phenotypic and Clinical Characterization Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 44(5): 607 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sanchez, G. A. Ramirez, A. J. Buendia, M. Vilafranca, C. M. Martinez, J. Altimira, and J. A. Navarro Immunohistochemical Characterization and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors in Canine Oral Melanomas with Osteocartilaginous Differentiation Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 44(5): 676 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Shimoyama, Y. Akihara, D. Kirat, H. Iwano, K. Hirayama, Y. Kagawa, T. Ohmachi, K. Matsuda, M. Okamoto, T. Kadosawa, et al. Expression of Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 in Oral and Ocular Canine Melanocytic Tumors Vet. Pathol., July 1, 2007; 44(4): 449 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. L. Spangler and P. H. Kass The histologic and epidemiologic bases for prognostic considerations in canine melanocytic neoplasia. Vet. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 43(2): 136 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Zielinski, M. Muenchow, M. A. Wallig, P. L. Horn, and J. A. Woods Exercise delays allogeneic tumor growth and reduces intratumoral inflammation and vascularization J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2004; 96(6): 2249 - 2256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, S. H. Articles by McManus, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, S. H. Articles by McManus, P. M. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?