| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Biomedical Sciences (SLB, SPM) and Department of Clinical Sciences (KMR), College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; and Harrington Oncology Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA (ASM)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Cancer; cats; immunohistochemistry; squamous cell carcinoma; transitional cell carcinoma.
In the past two decades, numerous experimental, clinical, and epidemiologic studies have linked tumor development and progression with the presence of cyclooxygenase (COX) in tumor cells in humans. COX enzymes exist as two different isoforms and catalyze conversion of arachadonic acid to an array of prostaglandins. COX-1 is expressed constitutively in many cells and is involved in normal physiologic activities such as cytoprotection of the gastric mucosa, regulation of renal blood flow, and platelet aggregation. COX-2 is an inducible enzyme that is involved in the production of prostaglandins, which modulate pathologic events such as inflammation, wound healing, and neoplasia. A variety of agonists including cytokines, growth factors, and oncogenes can induce COX-2 expression.7 COX-2 immunoreactivity is found in a number of human tumors including colon, lung, breast, gastric, prostatic, head and neck, and bladder carcinomas.7,20 More recently, COX-2 has been demonstrated in canine squamous cell, renal cell, and transitional cell carcinomas, prostatic adenocarcinomas, and intestinal neoplasias.4,8,9,12,15,21
Recent studies also demonstrate that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which inhibit COX enzymes, can reduce the incidence of cancer in humans and experimental animal models and may be potential targets for therapeutic and preventive strategies.7,11,13,18,20 Importantly, the relative risk of developing epithelial cancer, including colonic carcinoma, is lower in persons receiving aspirin therapy.7,18,20 In veterinary medicine, dogs with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder may have complete or partial reductions in tumor size when treated with piroxicam, a potent NSAID.10,13 Recently, antitumor activity was reported in dogs with oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with piroxicam.17
The objective of this study was to characterize the expression of COX-2 in a variety of feline neoplasms. Results of this study may help determine whether COX-2 is a potential target for therapeutic and preventive strategies in cats with tumors.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunoperoxidase (biotin-streptavidin) staining was performed on all sections using a rabbit polyclonal antibody to COX-2 (PG27B, Oxford Biomedical Research, Oxford, MI). Four-micron-thick tissue sections mounted onto poly-L-lysinetreated Probe-On slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Endogenous peroxidases were degraded by incubating the sections in 0.5% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 20 minutes. After a 15-minute wash in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline with 0.4% Brij, pH 7.2 (PBSB), the tissues were microwaved at high power for two sets of 10 minutes each in 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 6.0. The tissues were rinsed in PBSB for 15 minutes and then incubated in 10% nonimmune goat serum (blocking solution, 95-6143, Zymed, San Francisco, CA) at room temperature for 20 minutes. The COX-2 antibody, diluted 1 : 100 in PBS, was applied, and the sections were incubated overnight at 4 C. After rinsing in PBSB for 15 minutes, the biotinylated secondary antibody (biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG H+L BA-1000, Vector, Burlingame, CA) diluted 1 : 200 in PBS was applied, and the sections were incubated at room temperature for 45 minutes. After a 15-minute rinse in PBSB, RTU Elite ABC reagent (Vectastain PK-7100, Vector) was applied and incubated at room temperature for 45 minutes. The antibody reaction products were observed with the chromagen 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (DAB, 71-00-08, Kirkegaard and Perry Lab, Gaithersburg, MD) and counterstained briefly with Gill's hematoxylin. Negative control tissues were treated similarly except that normal nonimmune rabbit serum, used as a nonspecific antibody control, was substituted for the COX-2 antibody. Canine squamous cell (n = 5) and transitional cell carcinomas (n = 1) were used as positive control tissues.
Immunoreactivity was evaluated in a blinded fashion (SLB), which assessed grade (percentage of positive cells) and staining intensity. Five 10x; fields from each slide were evaluated. The grade was evaluated by the following scoring system:15 0 = negative; 1 = <10% of cells staining positive; 2 = 1030%; 3 = 3160%; 4 = >60%. Intensity was evaluated by the following scoring system: 0 = negative; 1+ = weak staining; 2+ = moderately intense staining; and 3+ = intense staining.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lack of detectable COX-2 expression in the majority of feline epithelial neoplasms in this study may have been caused by sample size, failure of the antigen retrieval method used, or other confounding variables such as the type of fixative or prolonged fixation. Formalin fixation or tissue processing (or both) destroys or denatures several proteins, thereby altering antigenic recognition by immunohistochemistry.6,16,19 However, positive staining of seven of 19 transitional cell carcinomas and two of 27 oral squamous cell carcinomas indicates that the COX-2 antigenic epitopes are expressed in cats and are detectable with the polyclonal antibody used. In addition, inflammatory cells (presumptive macrophages and myofibroblasts) at ulcerated sites in five of the feline tumors displayed COX-2 immunoreactivity, which served as positive internal controls. The polyclonal antibody used in this study has detected COX-2 in canine tissues in previous studies9,13 as well as in control canine tissues used in this study. These results suggest a basic species difference between feline and dog neoplasms in COX-2 expression. It is possible that the polyclonal antibody used may not be a sensitive indicator of COX-2 antigenic epitopes present in the cat. Potentially, other polyclonal COX-2 antibodies or a feline monoclonal antibody could be used to more fully characterize the presence of COX-2 in feline tumors. An alternative explanation is that COX-2 concentrations in feline tumors are below the level of immunohistochemical detection. Although not attempted in the present study, the use of frozen sections for these studies may yield more reliable results. Determination of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentration is commonly used as a marker for COX-2 activity.5,14 Future studies to evaluate a larger number of feline tumors with these techniques would be useful to confirm the findings of the present study.
The mechanism of action of COX-2 and COX metabolites such as PGE2 in tumors is beginning to be elucidated. Prostaglandins, produced by COX-2 activity, increase cell proliferation, inhibit apoptosis, promote angiogenesis, alter cellular adhesion that allows for metastasis, inhibit immune surveillance, and may activate xenobiotics to reactive substances that are carcinogenic.7,1113,18,20,22 Mechanisms responsible for initial upregulation of COX-2 in neoplastic tissues are still unclear.
COX and PGE2 are being evaluated as targets for cancer prevention and treatment. In numerous studies on humans, the chronic use of NSAIDs is linked to a lower incidence of several types of epithelial neoplasms including colon, breast, gastric, and esophageal carcinomas.7,18,20 COX-2 inhibitors cause reductions in neoplastic cell numbers in vitro and tumor regression in mouse tumor models.7,18,20 In phase I and II clinical trials, COX-2 inhibitors reduced tumor size in naturally occurring canine transitional cell and squamous cell carcinoma.10,13,17
This study represents, to our knowledge, the first attempt to evaluate COX-2 expression in feline tumors. The widespread absence of COX-2 expression in most feline neoplasms might suggest that COX-2 inhibitors would have a low potential as anticancer agents for cat. However, COX inhibitors have demonstrated antiproliferative effects in human cell lines that are independent of COX-2 expression.22 Preliminary studies indicate that NSAIDs may exert anticancer effects by both COX-dependent and COX-independent mechanisms.11,18 Although the molecular targets of these COX-independent effects are not known, recent studies have identified several signaling pathways, including peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor-
(PPAR-
), 15-lipoxygenase-1, and Akt/protein kinase B (PKB), which may potentially play roles in NSAID-mediated anticancer cellular actions.1 PPAR-
is a member of a nuclear hormone receptor family that plays a key role in inducing terminal cell differentiation or inducing apoptosis.2,3 PPAR-
is also antiangiogenic by mechanisms that involve apoptosis or decreased expression of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (or both).3 15-Lipoxygenase-1 is upregulated by COX inhibition. 15-Lipoxygenase-1 catalyzes the production of 13-S-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid, which has growth-inhibitory and proapoptotic properties.22 Finally, the Akt/PKB pathway is a major antiapoptotic pathway.1 In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that NSAIDs reduce phosphorylation (thus activation) of Akt/PKB pathways by inhibiting 3-phosphoinositidedependent kinase 1. Further studies of these molecular targets in feline tumors or clinical studies with COX-2 inhibitors are needed to fully evaluate the potential role of COX-2 inhibitors as therapeutic adjuncts in cats with tumors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(review). Int J Oncol 20:1109-1122, 2002[Web of Science][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Sayasith, J. Sirois, and M. Dore Molecular Characterization of Feline COX-2 and Expression in Feline Mammary Carcinomas Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2009; 46(3): 423 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Thamm, E. J. Ehrhart III, J. B. Charles, and Y. A. Elce Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Equine Tumors Vet. Pathol., November 1, 2008; 45(6): 825 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Boonsoda and P. Wanikiat Possible role of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents Vet Rec., February 2, 2008; 162(5): 159 - 161. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Rassnick and B. L. Njaa Cyclooxygenase-2 immunoreactivity in equine ocular squamous-cell carcinoma J Vet Diagn Invest, July 1, 2007; 19(4): 436 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Newman and L. Mrkonjich Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in feline pancreatic adenocarcinomas J Vet Diagn Invest, November 1, 2006; 18(6): 590 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Landolfi and K. A. Terio Transitional Cell Carcinoma in Fishing Cats (Prionailurus viverrinus): Pathology and Expression of Cyclooxygenase-1, -2, and p53. Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2006; 43(5): 674 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |