Vet Pathol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cline, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cline, J. M.
Vet Pathol 43:471-483 (2006)
© 2006 American College of Veterinary Pathologists

Hyperplastic and Neoplastic Lesions of the Mammary Gland in Macaques

C. E. Wood, A. L. Usborne, M. F. Starost, R. P. Tarara, L. R. Hill, L. M. Wilkinson, K. R. Geisinger, E. A. Feiste and J. M. Cline

Department of Pathology/Section on Comparative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (CEW, LMW, KRG, EAF, JMC), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, Madison, WI (ALU), , and California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, CA (RPT), Center for Comparative Medicine and Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, , Houston, TX (LRH)


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Macaques provide an important animal model for the study of hormonal agents and their effects on risk biomarkers for breast cancer. A common criticism of this model is that spontaneous breast cancer has rarely been described in these animals. In this report, we characterize 35 mammary gland lesions ranging from ductal hyperplasia to carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma in cynomolgus and rhesus macaques. Based on a retrospective analysis, we estimated the lifetime incidence of mammary gland neoplasia in aged female macaques to be about 6%. Hyperplastic lesions (n = 19) occurred segmentally along ducts and included such features as columnar alteration, micropapillary atypia, and fibroadenomatous change. In situ carcinomas (n = 8) included solid, comedo, cribriform, and micropapillary elements, encompassing 4 of the major architectural patterns seen in human lesions. Invasive ductal carcinomas (n = 8) were generally solid, with prominent central necrosis and mineralization, often on a background of micropapillary ductal hyperplasia and in situ carcinoma. Cytologic changes of invasive lesions included increased mitoses, nuclear pleomorphism, extensive microinvasion, and stromal desmoplasia. Axillary lymph-node metastases were confirmed in 5 of the 8 invasive carcinomas. On immunohistochemistry, intraductal and invasive carcinomas had increased Ki67/MIB1 and HER2 expression and selective loss of estrogen and progesterone receptors. These findings suggest that breast cancer is an underreported lesion in macaques and highlight unique morphologic and molecular similarities in breast cancer between human and macaque species.

Key words: Animal; animal models; immunohistochemistry; Macaca; mammary neoplasms.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The mammary glands of macaques are similar to those of women in many aspects of physiology and pathology.15,34,40,44 Human and macaque mammary glands share similar patterns of development and regression, cytokeratin phenotype, sex steroid receptor expression, mechanisms of glandular secretion, and steroidogenic enzyme expression.28,31,44,49 Female macaques also exhibit reproductive characteristics comparable with women, including a 28-day menstrual cycle,15 natural ovarian senescence,24 and reproductive tissue responses to exogenous estrogens.12,13 Despite these similarities, mammary gland tumors have been described only sporadically in macaques,1,4,14,19,23,27,30,45,46,54 while representing one of the primary causes of cancer death in women.29 This apparent species difference in breast cancer incidence is a common criticism of the macaque model for studying biomarkers of breast cancer risk. In this report, we describe a collection of spontaneous hyperplastic and neoplastic mammary gland lesions in cynomolgus and rhesus macaques. The goal of this study was to characterize these lesions based on morphology, proliferation, sex steroid receptors, and oncogene expression, and to evaluate similarities with human breast cancer.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Animal histories

The animals in this case series were adult rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus (M. fascicularis) macaques, Old World monkey species in the Family Cercopithecidae. Macaque cases were obtained from several institutions, including the Wake Forest University School of Medicine (WFUSM), the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center (WNPRC), the California National Primate Research Center (CNPRC), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDA), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Macaque cases were collected from several institutions by using both systematic (WNPRC, WFUSM) and opportunistic (CNPRC, UTMDA, NIH) survey methods (Tables 1 and 2). Incidence estimates for carcinomas are based on data from a lifetime aging study at WNPRC (females, n = 114) and a long-term study at WFUSM (males, n = 90) (Table 3). Estimates for hyperplasia incidence are based on cumulative data from several historical studies at WFUSM (females, n = 143; and males, n = 90). Within each category presented in Table 3, tissue-collection procedures and sampling intensity were uniform for all animals. However, sampling intensity across groups (e.g., between WNPRC and WFUSM animals) cannot be verified, and no conclusions should be drawn from any such comparisons. The at-risk population size for CNPRC, UTMDA, and NIH is not known.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Characteristics of macaques with hyperplastic mammary gland lesions.*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Characteristics of macaques with neoplastic mammary gland lesions.*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3 Estimated incidence of mammary gland lesions in macaques.

 
Case animals varied in age (range: 5 to 35 years, mean: 18.6 years) and hormonal status, including premenopausal, ovariectomized, and naturally postmenopausal female macaques and 1 male macaque. None of the case animals were pregnant. The animals had been fed various commercial monkey chow formulations supplemented with fruit (CNPRC, WNPRC, UTMDA, NIH) or custom formulated diets (WFUSM), all of which met the nutrition requirements of the National Research Council for nonhuman primates. A subset of monkeys received various oral hormonal agents (Tables 1 and 2), which included conjugated equine estrogens with (n = 1) or without medroxyprogesterone acetate (n = 4), triphasic oral contraceptive (n = 1), dihydroequilin (n = 1), and an experimental selective estrogen receptor modulator (n = 1). All doses approximated those taken by women. Details of these studies are reported elsewhere.11–13,21 A summary of pathologic findings from the aging WNPRC colony has also been described previously.50

Histopathology

Lesions were identified either grossly or during routine histologic examination of mammary gland tissues. All mammary tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin upon removal, although we cannot verify that all fixation procedures (e.g., time in fixative) were uniform across the various contributing institutions. For routine evaluation, the glands were sectioned sagittally through the nipple and trimmed to 2–3 cm in length. Fixed tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned to 5 µm in thickness for hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and immunohistochemical staining.

HE stained slides were evaluated qualitatively for histologic changes by multiple investigators (CEW, JMC, and the submitting pathologist for each case) and also were reviewed with an MD pathologist (KRG) for consistency with human terminology. Ductal hyperplasia was defined as increased cellularity of the ductal epithelium beyond that seen under physiologic conditions and in which the epithelial layer is at least 3 cell layers in thickness (including myoepithelium). Ductal hyperplasias were further classified as conventional (DH) or atypical (ADH); a diagnosis of ADH required either cytologic or architectural atypia. Lobular hyperplasia was defined by distention and distortion of <50% of the acini in a lobule by atypical lobular epithelial cells. Focally enlarged lobular units with regular acini were considered physiologic and were not included as lesions. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was defined by proliferation of ductal cells that have malignant architectural and cytologic features but have not breached the basement membrane.32 Atypical architectural features included comedo, cribriform, papillary, solid, and micropapillary patterns; cytologic features of atypia included loss of polarity, uneven distribution of nuclei, increased mitoses, anisokaryosis or anisocytosis, and necrosis. Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) was defined by distention and distortion of >50% of the acini in a lobule by atypical lobular epithelial cells.35 Human lobular carcinomas frequently undergo a specific chromosomal alteration resulting in loss of the adhesion molecule E-cadherin.53 Equivocal in situ lesions were thus immunostained for E-cadherin to assess lobular (–) or ductal (+) origin of neoplastic cells. Invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), the most common type of malignant breast cancer in women,41 were defined by extensive stromal invasion and/or evidence of lymph-node metastasis and vascular invasion. The modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson method was used for histologic grading of invasive carcinomas. Under this system, grade is assigned based upon the degree of tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic counts.17 For cases with multiple diagnoses (e.g., DCIS with IDC), the highest-grade lesion was used for classification and evaluation. Two case pairs are included (case Nos. 2 and 21, 24 and 30) in which sequential samples yielded different diagnoses.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunostaining procedures were performed on fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues by using commercially available primary monoclonal antibodies for Ki67/MIB1 (Ki67-MIB1; Dako, Carpinteria, CA), progesterone receptor (PR) (NCL-PGR; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), estrogen receptor alpha (ER{alpha}) (NCL-ER-6F11, Novocastra, UK), estrogen receptor beta (ERß) (MCA 1974, clone PPG5/10; Serotec, Raleigh, NC), HER2/neu (Herceptest, Dako, Carpinteria, CA), and E-cadherin (4A2C7; Zymed, San Francisco, CA). Staining methods included antigen-retrieval with citrate buffer (pH 6.0), biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse Fc antibody as a linking reagent, alkaline phosphatase–conjugated streptavidin as the label, hematoxylin as the counterstain, and Vector Red as the chromogen (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Ki67/MIB1, PR, ER{alpha}, and ERß staining was quantified by a computer-assisted counting technique, by using a grid filter to select cells for counting33 and a modified procedure of cell selection, described previously.12 Numbers of positively stained cells were expressed as a percentage of the total number examined (200 cells). At least 3 separate microscopic fields were surveyed for each slide. By convention, HER2 immunoreactivity was assessed by using the standard Food and Drug Administration approved Herceptest scoring system, with the following categories: negative (0/1+), if <10% of neoplastic cells had membrane staining; weakly positive (2+), if >10% of the tumor cells had mild to moderate membrane staining; or strongly positive (3+), if >10% of tumor cells showed strong complete membrane staining.

All immunostaining batches included negative staining control slides treated with species-matched nonimmune serum in place of the primary antibody. The majority of slides with lesions (18/19 hyperplasias and 14/16 carcinomas) had at least a small amount of morphologically normal mammary gland present on the margins of the tissue, providing an additional internal staining control for these cases. Slides from a set of normal postmenopausal macaque mammary glands were also stained and counted as reference controls. We cannot exclude that potential differences in fixation may have introduced variation in immunostaining across lesions. Immunohistochemical counting was performed on a subset of hyperplasia cases because of loss of some lesions with sectioning. One carcinoma case (case No. 26) was excluded from immunohistochemical evaluation because of a complete lack of immunostaining in tumor or normal adjacent tissue, presumably because of improper fixation.

Statistics

Data were analyzed by using the SAS statistical package (version 8; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Group means and intergroup comparisons were determined by using a general linear model. Lesion types were sorted into the following categories: normal, ductal hyperplasia, LCIS, DCIS, and IDC. Correlations between immunohistochemical counts and morphologic criteria were evaluated by using Spearman's rank correlation test. Log10 transformations were performed where appropriate to improve normality and homogeneity of variance. A 2-tailed significance level of 0.05 was chosen for all comparisons.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Incidence and morphology

Macaque mammary gland lesions were classified as ductal hyperplasia (n = 19), carcinoma in situ (n = 8), or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (n = 8) (Tables 1 and 2). All hyperplastic lesions and 3 of 8 carcinoma in situ lesions (case Nos. 31–33) were found incidentally upon routine histology. Other lesions were observed grossly and removed either at surgery (case Nos. 2, 21, 30) or at necropsy. Invasive carcinomas were evident grossly as raised, subcutaneous masses, which were frequently periareolar and/or lateral to the nipple with extension toward the axillary region (Fig. 1a). Two of the cases were bilateral (case Nos. 27, 30), and 4 cases had associated cutaneous ulceration (case Nos. 26, 27, 34, 35). Carcinomas were generally firm, white to pale tan, and multinodular, ranging in size from ~1 cm3 to >50 cm3. Metastasis to the axillary lymph nodes was confirmed in 5 of the 8 invasive carcinomas (case Nos. 26, 27, 29, 34, 35). Other metastatic sites included lungs (Fig. 1b, c) (case Nos. 26, 29, 34, 35), chest wall (case No. 27), and visceral organs (case No. 34).


Figure 01
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1 Cynomolgus macaque, case No. 34.
Fig. 1a. Gross image of an invasive mammary gland ductal carcinoma (IDC). Note location of the mass lateral to the nipple with extension toward the right axillary lymph node. Bar = 3 cm.
Fig. 1b. Thoracic radiograph showing pulmonary metastasis of the IDC. Note multifocal to coalescing soft tissue opacities throughout lung field. Incidental findings include pectus excavatum and a diaphragmatic hernia. Bar = 5 cm.
Fig. 1c. Gross appearance of pulmonary metastases from the IDC, indicated by pale foci on the lung surface. Bar = 5 cm.

 
The lifetime incidence of mammary gland carcinoma (in situ and invasive) in female macaques was estimated at 6.1%, based on data from a population of aged animals at the WNPRC (Table 3). The single section incidence of mammary hyperplasia in younger female control animals in studies at WFUSM was 3.5%. While originating from distinct populations, animals with carcinomas were significantly older than those with hyperplastic lesions (P < 0.01). Among animals with hyperplastic breast lesions, 47% (9/19) had received hormonal treatment and 74% (14/19) were ovariectomized (ovx) (Table 1). The high number of ovx hyperplasia cases was likely because of the high proportion of ovx animals (~90%) among the sample population from WFUSM; of the ovx hyperplasia cases, 57% (8/14) had received some form of hormonal treatment.

Proliferative lesions showed a high degree of morphologic heterogeneity (Figs. 2–3). Hyperplastic mammary gland lesions ranged from mild to florid and included such general features as piling up of epithelial cells into mounds, tufts, and micropapillary stalks; cystic dilation of ducts; luminal bridging; and variable secretory changes. Architectural atypia was found in 9 of the 19 (47%) hyperplasia cases, with segmental micropapillary change representing the most common atypical growth pattern (Fig. 2b). Several cases included prominent expansion of the stroma in a loose myxomatous pattern resembling fibroadenomatous change (Fig. 2c). A common component of most hyperplastic ductal lesions was columnar alteration (also referred to as columnar cell metaplasia), similar to that described in the human literature.22,42 In this change, ductal epithelial cells become densely packed and stratified, with elongate hyperchromatic nuclei, sometimes with apical cytoplasmic "snouts" or secretory blebs (Fig. 3a). Ductal hyperplasia with columnar alteration was a prominent change easily distinguished from the more diffuse and regular nuclear rounding and enlargement produced by hormone treatment. In several cases, hyperplastic ducts were present within or adjacent to regions of ductal and lobular apocrine metaplasia; in the latter case, luminal epithelial cells often contained bright red intracytoplasmic secretory granules (more conspicuous than those seen in the human breast).


Figure 02
View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2 Mammary glands: cynomolgus and rhesus macaques. HE. Bars = 500 µm, unless otherwise stated.
Fig. 2a. Normal mammary gland with duct (arrowhead) and lobule (asterisk), control animal.
Fig. 2b. Micropapillary hyperplasia of a large duct, case No. 11
Fig. 2c. Fibroadenomatous-type ductal hyperplasia, case No. 2. Note the stromal expansion and partial filling of ducts.
Fig. 2d. Early stage solid-type ductal carcinoma in situ, case No. 22. Bar = 300 µm.
Fig. 2e. Comedo-type ductal carcinoma in situ with extensive necrosis and mineralization (dark areas), case No. 33. Bar = 400 µm.
Fig. 2f. Cribriform-type atypical ductal hyperplasia (asterisk) adjacent to an invasive ductal carcinoma (arrowhead), case No. 34. Bar = 200 µm.
Fig. 2g. Invasive ductal carcinoma with a comedo-type pattern of central necrosis and mineralization, case No. 25. Bar = 300 µm.
Fig. 2h. Invasive ductal carcinoma with dermal spread and epidermal ulceration, case No. 27.
Fig. 2i. Pulmonary metastasis of an invasive ductal carcinoma, case No. 35. Bar = 400 µm.

 

Figure 03
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3 Mammary glands: cynomolgus and rhesus macaques. HE.
Fig. 3a. Columnar alteration and stratification of ductal epithelium with apical secretory snouts, case No. 19. Bar = 30 µm.
Fig. 3b. Normal cuboidal epithelial morphology in an adjacent duct, case No. 19. Bar = 30 µm.
Fig. 3c. Ductal carcinoma in situ cells with nuclear pleomorphism, increased mitoses (dark arrowhead), lack of normal polarity and cohesion, prominent nucleoli, and pockets of necrosis (white arrowhead), case No. 33. Bar = 50 µm.
Fig. 3d. Apocrine-type ductal carcinoma in situ. Note columnar contours, pale granular cytoplasm, central nuclei, and secretory vacuoles, case No. 24. Bar = 30 µm.
Fig. 3e. Aggregate of invasive ductal carcinoma cells with high-grade nuclear pleomorphism and surrounding desmoplasia, case No. 34. Bar = 50 µm.
Fig. 3f. Stromal microinvasion of neoplastic ductal carcinoma cells (arrowheads), case No. 27. Bar = 30 µm.
Fig. 3h. Lymphatic invasion of ductal carcinoma cells within an axillary lymph node, case No. 35. Bar = 50 µm.

 
In situ ductal carcinomas incorporated 4 of the 5 major morphologies described for human lesions: comedo, solid, cribriform, and micropapillary. Several different growth patterns were often present within a single lesion, with solid and comedo types representing the most common combination. Lower magnification features of DCIS included marked expansion and filling of ducts by sheets of epithelial cells (Fig. 2d) and prominent comedo-type necrosis in 4 of 5 DCIS (case Nos. 21, 22, 24, 33) (Fig. 2e) and 1 of 3 LCIS lesions (Case No. 20). In situ carcinomas were commonly surrounded by a thin rim of capillaries and variable amounts of fibrosis. Cells within DCIS lesions often had increased mitotic rates, greater nuclear pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli, and a general lack of polarity and cohesion (Fig. 3c). Regions of several in situ carcinomas showed a dimorphic pattern with simple cuboidal surface epithelium overlying expansile populations of disorganized neoplastic cells, suggesting intraductal spread beneath the luminal epithelial layer. Five of the DCIS lesions were found within regions of conventional and ADH, and sequential biopsies in 1 case revealed regional progression from ADH to DCIS (case Nos. 2, 21). Extensive apocrine change was present throughout 1 LCIS (case No. 20) and 1 DCIS lesion (case No. 24) (Fig. 3d). Squamous differentiation was also present multifocally in 1 DCIS case along the margins of comedo necrosis (case No. 33). LCIS lesions were characterized by solid sheets of glandular epithelial cells, often interspersed with irregular acinar structures. LCIS cases generally displayed greater cellular uniformity but less cohesion than in situ ductal carcinomas. Neoplastic cells in 2 of the LCIS cases contained abundant flocculent pale eosinophilic cytoplasm, medium-sized round to oval nuclei, and distinct nucleoli (resembling type B human LCIS),25,42 while cells in the remaining LCIS lesion (case No. 31) had smaller amounts of amphophilic cytoplasm, small round dark nuclei, and no evident nucleoli (similar to type A LCIS).25,42

Invasive carcinomas ranged from low- to high grade morphology. Neoplastic cells were commonly arranged in sheets, with large round to oval euchromatic nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and amphophilic to pale basophilic cytoplasm. IDC lesions had significantly increased mitoses, nuclear pleomorphism (Fig. 3e), and loss of tubular morphology compared with normal control tissues and in situ lesions (Table 4). All IDC cases had regions of prominent central necrosis and mineralization. Thus, 81% (13/16) of macaque carcinomas had some degree of comedo-type change, about twice the 30–50% incidence reported in human breast carcinomas.3,36 While comedo type necrosis is an indicator of higher grade lesions in women, no clear associations were detected between necrosis extent and histologic grade in macaque carcinomas. Higher grade carcinomas also showed extensive stromal invasion (Fig. 3f) and marked loss of tubular architecture. In 1 case (case No. 26), neoplastic cells were diffusely expanded by abundant clear cytoplasm resembling clear cell change. Evidence of vascular invasion was found in 5 of the 8 carcinomas (case Nos. 25–27, 34, 35) (Fig. 3g) and nerve sheath invasion in 1 case (case No. 27). Two of the carcinomas involved the primary lactiferous ducts (case Nos. 34, 35). IDC lesions were consistently located on a background of ADH (Fig. 2f) and DCIS. General changes in areas surrounding carcinomas included stromal desmoplasia (Fig. 3e), neovascularization, cystic dilation of ducts, and lymphoplasmacytic infiltration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4 Histologic characteristics of mammary gland carcinomas in macaques.*

 
Immunohistochemistry

Tissues were immunostained for several markers of tumor differentiation and aggressiveness, including proliferation (Ki67/MIB1), sex steroid receptors (ER{alpha}, ERß, PR), and epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) (Figs. 4–9). Normal control breast tissues from a group of untreated ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys were also evaluated as a reference group. Ki67/MIB1-positive cells were generally present but in low numbers in normal control tissue epithelium (25/27, or 93%, of normal cases had ≤10% positive cells). Among proliferative lesions, Ki67/MIB1 expression increased with lesion severity and was significantly higher within ductal in situ and invasive carcinomas compared with normal breast epithelium (Table 5). Proliferation was also higher in IDC (P = 0.02) and DCIS (P = 0.08) lesions compared with LCIS lesions, consistent with the pattern of greater risk seen with human ductal versus lobular lesions.42 Among carcinomas, Ki67/MIB1 expression correlated with histologic grade (r2 = 0.44, P = 0.007) and mitotic figure count (r2 = 0.67, P = 0.0002) but not tubule formation (r2 = 0.02, P = 0.58). Internal control immunostaining for Ki67/MIB1 in morphologically normal tissue adjacent to lesions, expressed as mean percent positive cells, was 3.5% for normal reference tissues, 3.8% for ductal hyperplasia slides, 2.4% for LCIS slides, 3.8% for DCIS slides, and 7.5% for IDC slides (P = 0.26).


Figure 04
View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4–8 Immunohistochemical staining of cynomolgus and rhesus macaque mammary-gland lesions. Labeled streptavidin biotin, hematoxylin counterstain. All bars = 20 µm. DH = ductal hyperplasia; DCIS = ductal carcinoma in situ; IDC = invasive ductal carcinoma. Figs. 4a–d. Proliferation marker Ki67/MIB1. Scattered positive nuclear immunostaining for Ki67/MIB1 in normal mammary gland (control animal, Fig. 4a) and ADH (case No. 11, Fig. 4b); strong positive nuclear immunostaining in DCIS (case No. 21, Fig. 4c) and IDC (case No. 34, Fig. 4d).
Figs. 5a–d. Progesterone receptor (PR). Scattered positive nuclear immunostaining for PR in normal mammary gland (control animal, Fig. 5a) and ADH (case No. 11, Fig. 5b); negative immunostaining in DCIS (case No. 21, Fig. 5c) and IDC (case No. 28, Fig. 5d).
Figs. 6a–d. Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER{alpha}). Scattered positive nuclear immunostaining for ER{alpha} in normal mammary gland (control animal, Fig. 6a) and ADH (case No. 11, Fig. 6b); negative immunostaining in DCIS (case No. 21, Fig. 6c) and IDC (case No. 28, Fig. 6d).
Figs. 7a–d. Estrogen receptor-beta (ERß). Scattered positive nuclear immunostaining for ERß in normal mammary gland (control animal,
Fig. 7a) and ADH (case No. 11, Fig. 7b); negative immunostaining in DCIS (case No. 21, Fig. 7c) and IDC (case No. 28, Fig. 7d).
Figs. 8a–d. HER2/neu. Negative immunostaining for HER2/neu in normal mammary gland (control animal, Fig. 8a) and ADH (case No. 11, Fig. 8b); moderate positive immunostaining in DCIS (case No. 21, Fig. 8c); strong positive immunostaining in IDC (case No. 28, Fig. 8d).

 

Figure 05
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 9 Mammary gland ductal carcinoma, cynomolgus macaque, case No. 35. Labeled streptavidin biotin, hematoxylin counterstain. Bars = 50 µm. Strong positive immunohistochemical staining for progesterone receptor (PR)
(Fig. 9a), estrogen receptor-alpha (ER{alpha})
(Fig. 9b), and estrogen receptor-beta (ERß)
(Fig. 9c).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 5 Immunohistochemical characteristics of mammary gland lesions in macaques. *

 
Sex steroid receptor expression was present in all normal cases and generally ranged from 5–20% for PR, ER{alpha}, and ERß. Among lesions, sex steroid expression was lower overall compared with normal control tissues (Table 5) but highly variable among individual cases. Expression of at least 1 sex steroid receptor was detected in 14 of 15 (93%) hyperplasia lesions evaluated, while 1/3 (33%) LCIS, 2/5 (40%) DCIS, and 3/7 (43%) IDC lesions were completely sex steroid receptor negative. When present, nuclear reactivity for PR, ER{alpha}, and ERß in carcinomas was present either diffusely (as shown in Fig. 9) or within scattered patches of cells. ER{alpha} and PR staining intensity in carcinomas was highly variable but generally lower than that seen in normal and hyperplastic epithelium. ERß staining, which is typically more diffuse but lower intensity than ER{alpha} in normal tissue (Fig. 7a), was slightly higher intensity when present in carcinomas (Fig. 9c). Overall ER{alpha} reactivity (total % positive cells) tended to be associated with lower histologic grade within carcinomas, although this relation was not significant (r = 0.47, P = 0.08). One of the LCIS cases (case No. 31) had strong expression of ER{alpha}, ERß, and PR in nearly every neoplastic cell with very low Ki67/MIB1 expression.

The proportion of cases with strong cell membrane immunostaining for HER2 generally increased with lesion grade (Table 5; Fig. 8b–d), while minimal to no staining was found in normal control tissue (Fig. 8a) and normal internal control tissue adjacent to lesions. Positive membrane and cytoplasmic immunostaining for E-cadherin was present in normal ducts and lobuloalveolar units, with stronger reactivity in ducts (Fig. 10a). Among carcinomas, strong E-cadherin staining was present in 4 of 5 DCIS but none of the LCIS lesions (Fig. 10b–c). No immunostaining was observed for any markers in the negative staining control slides.


Figure 06
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 10 Mammary glands: cynomolgus and rhesus macaques. Labeled streptavidin biotin, hematoxylin counterstain. Bars = 80 µm.
Fig. 10a. Positive E-cadherin immunostaining in a normal duct and lobuloalveolar unit of a control animal.
Fig. 10b. Positive E-cadherin immunostaining in a normal duct (bottom) but not in lobular carcinoma in situ (top), case No. 31.
Fig. 10c. Positive cytoplasmic and membrane E-cadherin immunostaining in a ductal carcinoma in situ, case No. 21.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Acknowledgements
 References
 
Macaques provide an important animal model for evaluation of hormonal factors related to breast cancer risk. In this paper, we demonstrate a diverse range of histologic and immunohistochemical features of proliferative lesions in macaques, many of which resemble those seen in the human breast. Morphologic similarities included ductal hyperplasia with micropapillary and columnar changes; solid, comedo, micropapillary, and cribriform patterns of in situ carcinoma; coincident ADH, carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma; and nodal and pulmonary metastases. Immunohistochemical similarities included increased epithelial expression of the proliferation marker Ki67/MIB1, loss of sex steroid receptors in a subset of carcinomas, increased HER2 oncogene expression in select higher grade lesions, and loss of E-cadherin expression in LCIS lesions.

Findings from this study suggest that mammary gland neoplasms are an underobserved or reported lesion in macaques. Based on available evidence from one of the few aging studies of macaques, rates appear to fall within the 4–8% lifetime incidence range seen in lower-risk populations of women.20,37 Sporadic reports dating back to 1940 have identified spontaneous and sex steroid induced mammary lesions in macaques,1,4,7,14,19,23,27,30,45,46,51,54 including one multistudy analysis that found a 42% incidence of intraductal hyperplasia in control animals.51 Still, few cases of invasive breast cancer in macaques have been characterized, and breast cancer has generally been considered a rare disease in nonhuman primates.7 This paucity of reports is likely multifactorial. First, the majority of captive macaques are not kept into their natural postmenopausal years (when the majority of breast cancer cases occur in women), contributing to an underestimation of the true incidence. Second, many of the macaques surveyed for this study were multiparous (based on breeding records or uterine histology) and ovariectomized, both of which lower breast cancer risk in women.10 Female macaques are also generally not as obese as higher-risk human populations and thus have lower endogenous postmenopausal estrogens, a trait also associated with reduced breast cancer incidence in women.10,18 Last, the standard monkey chow diet is high in soy protein, which may have protective effects against breast and other reproductive cancers.2 The preponderance of higher grade lesions in rhesus macaques (Table 2) may relate either to species differences in susceptibility or to the more advanced age of rhesus macaques surveyed.

While specific morphologic trends were identified (e.g., the propensity toward comedo-type necrosis), a distinctive feature of the macaque lesions was their heterogeneity. This characteristic differs from the more widely used animal models of human-breast cancer, which often produce more specific tumor types. For example, chemically induced mammary adenocarcinomas in rats typically express sex steroid receptors, require hormonal stimulation, and rarely metastasize or exhibit necrosis and mineralization.16,47 More recent genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models, in contrast, produce oncogene-specific mammary tumors that are frequently sex steroid receptor negative, hormone independent, metastatic (to lungs rather than nodes), and relatively uniform in morphology within a particular model.5 Descriptive terminology from rodent models may also be problematic, because it is not always similar to that of human breast lesions.6 The collection of macaque lesions in this study was readily categorized by human terminology and still highly variable in morphologic characteristics (e.g., mineralization in 10/16 or 63% of carcinomas), metastatic behavior (nodal involvement in 5/16 or 31% of carcinomas), age of onset (age range of 5 to 35 years), sex steroid receptor expression (present in 9/15 or 60% of carcinomas), and HER2 overexpression (present in 6/15 or 40% of carcinomas). While lacking the advantages of reproducibility and specificity found in rodent models, these diverse patterns correspond well with those seen in human breast cancer.26,36

In recent years, the experimental approach for macaque studies of cancer risk has shifted from longer-term descriptive investigations to more mechanistic biomarker studies. One of the more important biomarkers is the Ki67/MIB1 proliferation antigen. In human breast cancer, higher Ki67/MIB1 expression is significantly associated with increased carcinoma grade, poor clinical response to endocrine therapy, and decreased overall survival,8,52,55 while in macaques this marker has been used extensively to predict risk associated with various contraceptive and postmenopausal hormonal agents.9,13 In the current study, Ki67/MIB1 expression in invasive carcinomas (29.6% of cells) was similar to that of human breast carcinomas48 and was positively correlated with tumor grade. Higher grade carcinomas also showed selective loss of sex steroid receptors and increased expression of the oncogene HER2, both of which are important negative prognostic indicators for human breast cancers.39,43 These findings are further supported by recent genetic evidence showing ≥95% identity between human and macaque nucleic acid sequences for key oncogenes, such as the early onset breast cancer 1 gene (BRCA1).38

Because of their close phylogenetic relation, macaques have long been recognized as an important animal model in the study of human disease. In this paper, we demonstrated unique similarities between macaque and human mammary gland neoplasms. Macaque lesions, while morphologically diverse, followed well-described growth patterns for human breast cancer. Our findings point to key molecular parallels between the macaque and human breast and lend support to the use of risk biomarker analyses in this model. This information highlights the value of aged macaque colonies and how they may potentially provide insight into the natural history of human disease.


   Acknowledgements
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
References
 
We thank Hermina Borgerink, Beth Phifer, and Jean Gardin for their technical contributions. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant AT00639 (JMC), the National Center for Research Resources Grant T32 RR07009 (CEW), the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center Grant P51RR000167 (ALU), and the California National Primate Research Center Grant P51RR000169 (RPT).


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Appleby EC, Keymer IF, Hime JM. Three cases of suspected mammary neoplasia in non-human primates. J Comp Pathol 84:351–364, 1974[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Badger TM, Ronis MJ, Simmen RC, Simmen FA. Soy protein isolate and protection against cancer. J Am Coll Nutr 24:146S–149S, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Barnes NL, Boland GP, Davenport A, Knox WF, Bundred NJ. Relationship between hormone receptor status and tumour size, grade and comedo necrosis in ductal carcinoma in situ. Br J Surg 92:429–434, 2005[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Beniashvili DS. An overview of the world literature on spontaneous tumors in nonhuman primates. J Med Primatol 18:423–437, 1989[ISI][Medline]
  5. Cardiff RD. Validity of mouse mammary tumour models for human breast cancer: comparative pathology. Microsc Res Tech 52:224–230, 2001[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Cardiff RD, Anver MR, Gusterson BA, Hennighausen L, Jensen RA, Merino MJ, Rehm S, Russo J, Tavassoli FA, Wakefield LM, Ward JM, Green JE. The mammary pathology of genetically engineered mice: the consensus report and recommendations from the Annapolis meeting. Oncogene 19:968–988, 2000[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Casey HW, Giles RC, Kwapien RP. Mammary neoplasia in animals: pathologic aspects and the effects of contraceptive steroids. Recent Results Cancer Res 66:129–160, 1979[Medline]
  8. Chang J, Powles TJ, Allred DC, Ashley SE, Makris A, Gregory RK, Osborne CK, Dowsett M. Prediction of clinical outcome from primary tamoxifen by expression of biologic markers in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 6:616–621, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Clarkson TB, Appt SE, Wood CE, Cline JM. Lessons to be learned from animal studies on hormones and the breast. Maturitas 49:79–89, 2004[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Clemons M, Goss P. Estrogen and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 344:276–285, 2001[Free Full Text]
  11. Cline JM, Register TC, Clarkson TB. Effects of tibolone and hormone replacement therapy on the breast of cynomolgus monkeys. Menopause 9:422–429, 2002[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Cline JM, Soderqvist G, Skoog L, von Schoultz B. Effects of conjugated estrogens, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and tamoxifen on the mammary glands of macaques. Breast Cancer Res Treat 48:221–229, 1998[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Cline JM, Soderqvist G, von Schoultz E, Skoog L, von Schoultz B. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on the mammary gland of surgically postmenopausal cynomolgus macaques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:93–100, 1996[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. Cohen M, Saidla JE, Schlafer DH. A spontaneously occurring mammary gland ductal carcinoma in situ in a rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) and a review of spontaneous mammary gland tumors in rhesus monkeys. J Med Primatol 30:121–126, 2001[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  15. Corner GW. Ovulation and menstruation in Macacus rhesus. Contrib Embryol 15:73–102, 1923
  16. Costa I, Solanas M, Escrich E. Histopathologic characterization of mammary neoplastic lesions induced with 7, 12 dimethylbenz(alpha)anthracene in the rat: a comparative analysis with human breast tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 126:915–927, 2002[ISI][Medline]
  17. Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD. Histologic grading of breast carcinomas: a reproducibility study. Cancer 73:2765–2770, 1994[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:606–616, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Eydelloth R, Swindle M. Intraductal mammary carcinoma and benign ovarian teratoma in a rhesus monkey. J Med Primatol 12:101–105, 1983[ISI][Medline]
  20. Feuer EJ, Wun LM, Boring CC, Flanders WD, Timmel MJ, Tong T. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:892–897, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Foth D, Cline JM. Effects of mammalian and plant estrogens on mammary glands and uteri of macaques. Am J Clin Nutr 68:1413S–1417S, 1998[Abstract]
  22. Fraser JL, Raza S, Chorny K, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions: a spectrum of changes frequently present in breast biopsies performed for microcalcifications. Am J Surg Pathol 22:1521–1527, 1998[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  23. Geschickter CF, Hartman CG. Mammary response to prolonged estrogenic stimulation in the monkey. Cancer 12:767–781, 1959[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Gilardi KV, Shideler SE, Valverde CR, Roberts JA, Lasley BL. Characterization of the onset of menopause in the rhesus macaque. Biol Reprod 57:335–40, 1997[Abstract]
  25. Haagensen CD, Lane N, Lattes R, Bodian C. Lobular neoplasia (so-called lobular carcinoma in situ) of the breast. Cancer 42:737–769, 1978[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Helin HJ, Helle MJ, Kallioniemi OP, Isola JJ. Immunohistochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptors in human breast carcinoma. Correlation with histopathology and DNA flow cytometry. Cancer 63:1761–1767, 1989[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Hubbard GB, Wood DH, Buteher WJ. Mammary carcinoma with metastasis in a rhesus monkey. Vet Pathol 21:531–533, 1984[ISI][Medline]
  28. Isaakson E, Wang H, Sahlin L, von Schoultz B, Cline JM, von Schoultz E. Effects of long-term HRT and tamoxifen on the expression of progesterone receptors A and B in breast tissue from surgically postmenopausal cynomolgus macaques. Breast Cancer Res Treat 79:233–239, 2003[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55:10–30, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kirschstein RL, Rabbon AS, Rusten GW. Infiltrating duct carcinoma of the mammary gland of a rhesus monkey after administration of an oral contraceptive: a preliminary report. J Natl Cancer Inst 48:551–556, 1972[ISI][Medline]
  31. Labrie F, Belanger A, Simard J, Van L, Labrie C. DHEA and peripheral androgen and estrogen formation: intracinology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 774:16–28, 1995[ISI][Medline]
  32. Leonard GD, Swain SM. Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:906–920, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lindholm J, van Diest PJ, Haffner D, Mikuz G, Weger AR. A morphometric filter improves the diagnostic value of morphometric analyses of frozen histopathologic sections from mammary tumors. Anal Cell Pathol 4:443–449, 1992[ISI][Medline]
  34. Mahoney C. A study of the menstrual cycle in Macaca irus with special reference to the detection of ovulation. J Reprod Fertil 21:153–163, 1970[Medline]
  35. Page DL, Anderson TJ. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. New York, Churchill Livingtone. 1987
  36. Pallis L, Wilking N, Cedermark B, Rutqvist LE, Skoog L. Receptors for estrogen and progesterone in breast carcinoma in situ. Anticancer Res 12:2113–2115, 1992[ISI][Medline]
  37. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer 54:594–606, 1993[ISI][Medline]
  38. Pavlicek A, Noskov VN, Kouprina N, Barrett JC, Jurka J, Larionov V. Evolution of the tumor suppressor BRCA1 locus in primates: implications for cancer predisposition. Hum Mol Genet 13:2737–2751, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Reiner A, Neumeister B, Spona J, Reiner G, Schemper M, Jakesz R. Immunocytochemical localization of estrogen and progesterone receptor and prognosis in human primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 50:7057–7061, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Robinson JA, Goy RW. Steroid hormones and the ovarian cycle. In: Comparative Primate Biology Volume 3: Reproduction and Development Dukelow WR, Erwin J, Alan R, eds. Liss Inc., New York. 1986
  41. Rosen PP. The pathological classification of human mammary carcinoma: past, present and future. Ann Clin Lab Sci 9:144–156, 1979[Abstract]
  42. Rosen PP. Rosen's Breast Pathology, 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. 2001
  43. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177–182, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Speert H. The normal and experimental development of the mammary gland of the rhesus monkey with some pathologic correlations. Contrib Embryol 32: 9–65, 1948
  45. Tavassoli FA, Casey HW, Norris HJ. The morphologic effects of synthetic reproductive steroids on the mammary gland of rhesus monkeys. Am J Pathol 131:213–234, 1988[Abstract]
  46. Tekeli S, Ford TM. Spontaneous intraductal mammary carcinoma in a rhesus monkey. Vet Pathol 17:502–504, 1980[ISI][Medline]
  47. Thompson HJ, Singh M. Rat models of premalignant breast disease. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 5:409–420, 2000[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  48. Thor AD, Liu S, Moore DH, Edgerton SM. Comparison of mitotic index, in vitro bromodeoxyuridine labeling, and MIB-1 assays to quantitate proliferation in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:470–477, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Tsubura A, Hatano T, Hayama S, Morii S. Immunophenotypic difference of keratin expression in normal mammary glandular cells from five different species. Acta Anat (Basel) 140:287–293, 1991[ISI][Medline]
  50. Uno H. Age-related pathology and biosenescent markers in captive rhesus macaques. Age 20:1–13, 1997
  51. Valerio MG. Comparative aspects of contraceptive steroids: effects observed in the monkey. Toxicol Pathol 17:401–410, 1989[ISI][Medline]
  52. Veronese SM, Gambacorta M. Detection of Ki-67 proliferation rate in breast cancer. Correlation with clinical and pathologic features. Am J Clin Pathol 95:30–34, 1991[ISI][Medline]
  53. Vos CB, Cleton-Jansen AM, Berx G, de Leeuw WJ, ter Haar NT, van Roy F, Cornelisse CJ, Peterse JL, van de Vijver MJ. E-cadherin inactivation in lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: an early event in tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer 76:1131–1133, 1997[ISI][Medline]
  54. Warner MR. Mammary Pathology. In: Aging in Nonhuman Primates Bowden DM, ed. 1st ed., 210–228,Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. 1979
  55. Weidner N, Moore DH, Vartanian R. Correlation of Ki-67 antigen expression with mitotic figure index and tumor grade in breast carcinomas using the novel "paraffin"-reactive MIB1 antibody. Hum Pathol 25:337–342, 1994[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Request reprints from Charles E Wood, DVM, PhD, Comparative Medicine Clinical Research Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC (USA) 27157-1040. E-mail: chwood{at}wfubmc.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol PatholHome page
C. E. Wood, J. M. Hester, and J. M. Cline
Mammary Gland Development in Early Pubertal Female Macaques
Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2007; 35(6): 793 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
D. L. Perry, J. M. Spedick, T. P. McCoy, M. R. Adams, A. A. Franke, and J. M. Cline
Dietary Soy Protein Containing Isoflavonoids Does Not Adversely Affect the Reproductive Tract of Male Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca fascicularis)
J. Nutr., June 1, 2007; 137(6): 1390 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cline, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cline, J. M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS