Vet Pathol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sipos, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schmoll, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sipos, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schmoll, F.
Vet Pathol 44:411-413 (2007)
© 2007 American College of Veterinary Pathologists


BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS AND CASE REPORTS

Fibroepithelial Hamartoma in a Domestic Pig

W. Sipos, F. Griessler, F. Schilcher, I. Stumpf, E. Pirker and F. Schmoll

Clinic for Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria (WS, IS, FSchmoll); Institute for Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria (FSchilcher); and Traunkreis VetClinic, Austria (FG, EP)

Abstract

This case report is the first description of a fibroepithelial hamartoma in a pig. The dysplasia, which covered half of the face of the newborn piglet, did not increase in relative size until the animal was euthanatized at 6 months of age. Histologic examination revealed a moderate orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis with variable degrees of epithelial proliferation. The main body of the dysplasia consisted of collagenous fibers. In addition, some proliferating small blood vessels as well as focally gathered dilated apocrine glands were evident. Given morphologic and clinical features, the diagnosis of a hamartoma seemed to be justified.


Key words: Dysplasia; fibropapilloma; hamartoma; pig.

Tumors are an extremely rare event in pigs with the exception of melanomas in specific breeds.16 Neoplasms described in pigs include those of the hematopoietic system,2,7,14 genital leiomyomas, fibromas, and cyst-adenomas in high parity sows,1 as well as nephroblastomas and rhabdomyosarcomas in newborn or juvenile pigs.12 Hamartomas have to be differentiated from true neoplasms, as they represent an embryologic malformation resulting in overgrowth of one or more mature tissue types that are normally found in a given anatomic location. Fibropapillomas often show morphologic features of cutaneous hamartomas and are relatively common in small ruminants and cattle.11 Bovine papilloma viruses have been recognized as etiologic agents for fibropapillomas, which can affect various epidermal and mucosal surfaces and thus may cause severe illness depending on their mass and location.15 In pigs, viral papillomas and fibromas of the skin have not been described as yet.4 This case report describes a congenital tumor on a pig's face with histologic features of a fibroepithelial hamartoma rather than those of a neoplasm, although its gross morphology strongly suggested a soft-tissue sarcoma or fibropapilloma, respectively.

On a conventional closed-breeding and fattening farm, a newborn piglet showed a dysplasia (180 x 100 x 110 mm) covering the right side of the animal's head from the supraorbital region to the throat. The littermates were completely normal. The piglet suckled normally and grew satisfactorily after weaning. Nevertheless, the pig was submitted to the clinic for diagnostic reasons at about 4 months of age. At arrival, the pig was subjected to a physical examination. No clinical abnormalities were evident with exception of the dysplasia, which had not gained size during the piglet's life according to the farmer. The surface had a rugged contour and was of red-to-brown color. The consistency of the dysplasia was elastic-to-firm. Besides the main dysplasia, additional considerably smaller-sized formations of a similar phenotype were scattered on the pig's head. One such singular nodule was biopsied under ketamine-acepromazine anesthesia. Histologic examination revealed a papillomatous structure of the epidermis with mature fibrous tissue beneath. Therefore, a presumptive classification of fibropapilloma-like hamartoma was made. Over the following 2 months, the pig grew normally and was seemingly not hampered by the dysplasia, which did not change in relative size or structure over time (Fig. 1). After that period, the pig was euthanatized at a body weight of 123 kg. A thorough patho-anatomical examination did not yield any abnormal findings other than the facial mass. The surface of the cauliflower-like dysplasia had a deeply digitated or papillated configuration and was ulcerated focally, especially at the ventral (i.e., the mandibular) regions. The subcutis was not involved in the pathology (Fig. 2). Histologic examination revealed a mild-to-moderate acanthosis and orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis (Fig. 3). The bulk of the dysplasia was composed mainly of collagenous fibers with some small blood vessels as well as focally gathered dilated apocrine glands distributed throughout the body of the mass (Fig. 4). A mild-to-moderate perivascular infiltrate of predominantly histiocytes and plasma cells with scattered neutrophils was found in the collagenous tissue. Sebaceous glands and hair follicles had largely been destroyed, whereas some of the remaining hair follicles were heavily distended and filled with mature keratin. The adjacent healthy skin regions revealed normal hair structures. The regional lymph nodes (i.e., the mandibular and parotid lymph nodes) showed no signs of pathologic alterations.


Figure 01
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Hamartoma; pig. The relative size of the dysplasia did not change over time. The surface had a rugged contour of red-to-brown color.
Fig. 2. Hamartoma; pig. The hamartoma exhibited a cauliflower-like exophytic growth with no involvement of the subcutis beneath.
Fig. 3. Hamartoma; pig. The dysplasia was composed of a papilliferous hyperplastic epithelium, hyperkeratosis, and highly proliferative fibrous tissue. HE stain. Bar = 250 µm.
Fig. 4. Hamartoma; pig. Clusters of dilated apocrine glands and islets of sebaceous glands with degenerated sebaceous epithelial cells were distributed throughout the hamartoma. In addition, a mild perivascular infiltration with inflammatory cells is evident. HE stain. Bar = 100 µm.

 
Cutaneous hamartomas have not previously been reported in artiodactyls. Unlike in pigs, hamartomas are observed quite frequently in ruminants but involve other tissues or organs such as blood vessels, gonads, digestive tract, and lung.3,6,9,10,13,17,1921 In contrast, a variety of epithelial and mesenchymal hamartomas of the skin have been identified in dogs and cats.8 Inflamed linear epidermal nevi are rare events in dogs and bear striking resemblance to inflamed linear verrucous epidermal nevus in humans. Despite some macromorphologic and histologic similarities to the presented pig, the acanthosis in inflamed linear epidermal nevi is more irregular and accompanied by severe parakeratosis, and the dermis has more prominent inflammation. Collagenous hamartomas are relatively common lesions in dogs and were first identified as fibromas, revealing the difficulties in discerning hamartomas from true neoplasms. These hamartomas are noncircumscribed nodules of redundant collagen within the dermis with a usually intact overlying epidermis and are thus well distinguishable from the lesion described in our pig.

Many different types of cutaneous hamartomas have been described in humans.18 Collagenous hamartomas in humans are very similar to those described in dogs, and sometimes a family history is present. In contrast to the presented pig, collagenous hamartomas do not have a papillated epidermis. Epidermal nevi are developmental malformations of the epidermis and associated with an excess of keratinocytes. In the majority of cases, an impressive hyperkeratosis, with papillomatosis of relatively broad and flat type, together with acanthosis is found. A distinct pathologic feature is the inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevus, which most often presents as a pruritic linear eruption on the lower extremities. However, an exact classification of the tumors is not always possible, as demonstrated by a case of a congenital subcutaneous lesion composed of a mixture of T and B cells, epithelial cells, and, finally, dendritic cells as the predominant cell type. This lesion seemed to be benign, as no recurrence could be observed after total removal.5

This case report describes for the first time a cutaneous hamartoma in a pig. The classification of the dysplasia as hamartoma was not only based on morphologic features, but also on the clinical history of congenital origin. Seemingly, the large size of the hamartoma did not disturb the animal. This finding was supported by the fact that, despite the mild-to-moderate inflammatory process, the regional lymph nodes did not show any reactions typical for inflammation in the tributary region. By comparison with dermatopathology literature covering other veterinary species and humans, an exact analogy with any known epithelial and mesenchymal hamartoma of the skin could not be found.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Wilhelm Behringer, MD, from the Medical University of Vienna, for valuable discussion and Klaus Bittermann for excellent technical assistance.

References

  1. Akkermans JP, van Beusekom WJ. Tumors and tumor-like lesions in the genitalia of sows. Vet Q 6:90–96, 1984[ISI][Medline]
  2. Allsup TN, Wells GAH, Stevenson RM. Myeloid leukosis in a piglet. Vet Rec 108:231–232, 1981[ISI][Medline]
  3. Benoit JM, Lefebvre RC, Mulon PY, Raggio I, Dore M. Ovarian vascular hamartoma in a cow. Can Vet J 46:1026–1028, 2005[ISI][Medline]
  4. Cameron R. Diseases of the skin. In: Diseases of Swine Straw B, Zimmerman JJ, D'Allaire S, Taylor DJ, eds. 9th ed., 179–198,Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA. 2006
  5. Craver R, Ward K, Heinrich S. Congenital subcutaneous dendritic cell rich lymphoepithelial hamartoma. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 24:255–265, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. De Bosschere H, Ducatelle R. Bile duct hamartoma in a calf. Vet Rec 144:210–211, 1999[ISI][Medline]
  7. Ganter M, Waldmann KH. Myeloid leukemia in a Göttingen miniature swine. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr 102: 241–244, 1989[ISI][Medline]
  8. Gross TL, Ihrke PJ, Walder EJ, Affolter VK, eds. Skin Diseases of the Dog and Cat: Clinical and Histopathologic Diagnosis, 2nd ed Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. 2005
  9. Ladds PW. Vascular hamartomas of the liver of cattle. Vet Pathol 20:764–767, 1983[ISI][Medline]
  10. Lee CG, Ladds PW. Vascular hamartoma of the ovary in a cow. Aust Vet J 52:236, 1976[ISI][Medline]
  11. McCrea CT, Head KW. Sheep tumours in northeast Yorkshire. I. Prevalence on seven moorland farms. Br Vet J 134:454–461, 1978[ISI][Medline]
  12. Misdorp W. Congenital and hereditary tumours in domestic animals. 2. Pigs. A review. Vet Q 25:17–30, 2003[ISI][Medline]
  13. Roth L, Bradley GA. Pulmonary hamartoma in a calf. J Comp Pathol 105:471–474, 1991[ISI][Medline]
  14. Sipos W, Gerner W, Schilcher F, Leeb C, Groiss S, Miller I, Saalmüller A, Schmoll F, Schwendenwein I. Immunophenotypic characterization of peripheral blasts in a leukemic miniature pig. Vet Pathol 43: 362–367, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sipos W, Schilcher F. Fibropapillomas in rumen and reticulum in a heifer as a cause of chronic indigestion. Wien Tierärztl Monat 93: 53–56, 2006
  16. Tissot RG, Beattie CW, Amoss MS, Williams JD, Schumacher J. Common swine leucocyte antigen (SLA) haplotypes in NIH and Sinclair miniature pigs have similar effects on the expression of an inherited melanoma. Anim Genet 24:191–193, 1993[ISI][Medline]
  17. Tylor JW, Hassel DM, Long MT, Henry CJ, Parish SM. Testicular vascular hamartoma in a calf. Vet Rec 136: 420, 1995[ISI][Medline]
  18. Weedon D. Skin Pathology, 2nd ed Churchill Livingstone, London, UK. 2002
  19. Wilson RB. Gingival vascular hamartoma in three calves. J Vet Diagn Invest 2:338–339, 1990[Free Full Text]
  20. Yamaguchi M, Machida N, Mitsumori K, Nishimura M, Ito Y. Smooth muscle hamartoma of the abomasum in a calf. J Comp Pathol 130:66–69, 2004[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  21. Yeruham I, Abramovitch I, Perl S. Gingival vascular hamartoma in two calves. Aust Vet J 82:152–153, 2004[ISI][Medline]
Dr. W Sipos, Clinical Department for Farm Animals and Herd Management, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210, Vienna, (Austria). E-mail: wolfgang.sipos{at}vu-wien.ac.at





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sipos, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schmoll, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sipos, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schmoll, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS