Vet Pathol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vascellari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mutinelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vascellari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mutinelli, F.
Vet Pathol 44:635-642 (2007)
© 2007 American College of Veterinary Pathologists

Pathologic Findings of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) in Experimentally Infected Pekin Ducks, Based on Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization

M. Vascellari, A. Granato, L. Trevisan, L. Basilicata, A. Toffan, A. Milani and F. Mutinelli

Histopathology Laboratory, FAO/OIE and National Reference Laboratory for Newcastle Disease and Avian Influenza, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Italy


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The ongoing H5N1 Asian epidemic is currently affecting a number of avian species including ducks. These birds are an important part of the poultry industry in the affected countries, and it is likely that they are acting as a reservoir of infection. Ten Pekin ducks were challenged with 100 µl containing 107 50% egg infective dose of the highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1), administered by an intra-nasal and oral route. Clinical symptoms were recorded twice a day up to 14 days postinfection (dpi). Clinical signs were first noted at 2 dpi, with conjunctivitis and slight depression, and progressed over a period of 1–3 days to severe neurologic signs consisting of torticollis, incoordination, tremors, and seizures. Survival times varied from 3 to 7 dpi. On postmortem examination, hemorrhages were observed in the duodenum, ceca, proventriculus, ventriculus, trachea, pancreas, and brain. Histologic lesions, as well as immunohistochemistry positivity, were recorded in the pancreas and brain. In situ hybridization revealed viral antigen associated with acinar pancreatic cells, bronchial epithelial cells, and with cells of the central nervous system as well as neurons of the submucosal plexus of the duodenum. Our experimental findings agree with those previously observed in ducks naturally infected with HPAIV H5N1 viruses, confirming the acquired viral neurotropism and pancreatotropism, as previously noted in other avian species, as well as in humans.

Key words: Duck; H5N1; highly pathogenic avian influenza; immunohistochemistry; in situ hybridization.

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an acute, generalized, fatal disease etiologically restricted only to those avian influenza virus strains of the subtypes H5 and H7, which code for a furin-sensitive cleavage site in their hemagglutinin protein and, therefore, are capable of inducing systemic infections.24 Wild aquatic birds, including ducks, are the natural reservoir of influenza type A viruses and play an important role in the ecology and propagation of the viruses. Viruses representative of all 16 hemagglutinin and all 9 neuraminidase subtypes have been isolated from waterfowl. From this reservoir, influenza A viruses can occasionally be transmitted to other avian and mammalian hosts, including humans, and can cause outbreaks of severe disease. Influenza viruses in wild aquatic birds have long been in a state of evolutionary equilibrium, and infected hosts usually show no signs of disease.38 However, during the 1999–2000 H7 avian influenza outbreak in Italy, mortality was observed in 2 domestic geese and 2 Muscovy ducks.6 Since late 2002, H5N1 outbreaks in Asia have caused mortality among waterfowl in recreational parks, domestic flocks, and wild migratory birds.8,30 Between late 2003 and early 2005, H5N1 avian influenza spread in an unprecedented fashion across 10 Asian countries, resulting in 53 human fatalities in Thailand, Vietnam, and Cambodia and the death and slaughter of more than 150 million birds, as reported by the World Health Organization (http://who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/en/). During the Asian H5N1 outbreak of 2003–2005, domestic ducks were among the species affected by the epidemic, although they were not as dramatically affected as the more susceptible host, the chicken.

These recent developments, together with the lack of in-depth knowledge on the pathogenesis of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) infection in ducks, have stimulated the following investigations focusing on the clinical and pathologic findings and viral spread in Pekin ducks experimentally infected with the HPAIV A/duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH).


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Viruses

The challenge was carried out with strain A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) HPAIV. The challenge strain was selected from among 20 H5N1 isolates originating from 20 different Vietnamese outbreaks in 2005. Four out of the 20 virus isolates responsible for disease and high mortality rates in Vietnamese duck flocks were typed and titrated according to Council Directive 92/40/EEC (now replaced by Council Directive 2005/94/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

The strain A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) was isolated in Hanoi province during an Asian influenza (AI) outbreak in domestic ducks, confirmed on 19 July 2005. The number of virus passages in embryonated eggs has been minimized in order to avoid any possible adaptation of the isolate to egg embryos. The A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) was inoculated in specific-pathogen free embryonated eggs, and the 50% egg infective dose (EID 50) was calculated according to the Reed and Muench method.21 The titer of the challenge virus was 107,25 EID 50/100 µl. The challenge virus was diluted in sterile phosphate buffered saline in order to obtain a viral solution of 107 EID 50/100 µl.

Animals and experimental design

Fifteen 1-day-old commercial male and female Pekin ducks, clinically healthy and serologically negative to AI, were housed in biosafety level 3 facilities. Birds were fed ad libitum on a commercial feed appropriate for the growing period. Well water was provided ad libitum.

On day 52 of age, 100 µl containing 107 EID 50 of the challenge virus was administered to 10 ducks by intranasal and oral route. The viral dose was equally divided between intranasal and oral routes. Five animals received a sham-inoculated control and were kept separately as negative controls. In order to evaluate the pathogenicity of the A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) HPAIV, as well as the mortality and virus replication in duck tissues, birds were to be observed for 14 days postinfection (dpi), clinical signs were to be recorded twice a day, and birds that survived until the end of the observation period were to be euthanized.

Sampling

All ducks that died were immediately necropsied for determination of gross and histopathologic lesions. Skeletal muscles (leg, deep pectoral, and superficial pectoral), liver, the thoracic portion of trachea, lung, duodenum, cecal tonsils, pancreas, and brain were collected from each animal and immediately fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histologic examination.

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

After 24 hours, fixation samples were processed, paraffin-embedded, and stained with HE. Three-micrometer sections were cut, mounted on positively charged SuperFrost Plus microscope slides (Menzel, Braunschweig, Germany), dewaxed, and rehydrated. The antigen retrieval was performed by pressure cooking for 25 minutes in citrate buffer pH 6. The sections were incubated with the primary monoclonal antibody against type A influenza virus nucleoprotein (NP) (kindly supplied by Dr. D. E. Swayne, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture, Athens, GA), applied at 1 : 2,000 dilution. The EnVision AP (DAKO K1396, Carpinteria, CA) detection system and nuclear fast red (DAKO K1396) were used as chromogens. Sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. One positive and 1 negative control section were included in each IHC run.

ISH

Paraffin-embedded 3.5-µm sections were dewaxed and rehydrated successively in 100%, 90%, 70%, and 50% ethanol and finally in MilliQ sterile water (Millipore, Billerica, MA). After treatment with proteinase K (10 µg/ml; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) for 30 minutes at 37°C, the sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy) for 2 minutes at room temperature (RT) and then incubated in triethanolamine buffer containing 0.5% acetic anhydride for 10 minutes at RT. Dehydration was performed in 50%, 70%, 90%, and absolute ethanol, and sections were air-dried for about 15 minutes.

Sections were prehybridized in hybridization buffer without probe for 1 hour at 37°C. The probe (kindly supplied by Dr. R. Wagner, Institut fuer Virologie, Philipps-Universitaet, Marburg, Germany) is a single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) (riboprobe), resulting from the transcription of a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) insert subcloned into a commercially available plasmid (pBluescript KS+, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), labeled with digoxigenin (DIG). It is a 365-base pair (bp)-long fragment of the NP of influenza A virus A/FPV/Rostock/34 (H7N1) (Genbank M22576). The homology between the H7N1 and the H5N1 NP was 94%.

The DIG-RNA probe against type A influenza virus nucleoprotein was incubated in hybridization buffer (50% vol/vol formamide, 1% Denhardt's solution, 100 µg/ml transfer RNA, 100 µg/ml salmon testes DNA, 10% dextran sulfate, 1X sodium chloride-sodium citrate buffer (SSC), 0.5-M sodium chloride [NaCl]; Sigma-Aldrich) at 80°C for 5 minutes to allow possible probe secondary structure to relax. Finally, 250 ng of DIG-RNA probe were added to tissue sections, and the slides were incubated in a sealed humid chamber overnight at 42°C. Sections were washed in 50% formamide buffer/2X SSC 3 x 15 minutes at 42°C and successively in 2X SSC 3 x 15 minutes at 42°C. Sections were incubated with RNase A (20 µg/ml; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and RNase T1 (1 U/ml; Roche) for 30 minutes at 37°C and then were washed 2 x 20 minutes in 50% formamide buffer/2XSSC at 42°C and 2 x 20 minutes in 0.2XSSC at 42°C. All steps of immunodetection were performed in a sealed humid chamber. Sections were incubated in 1% normal sheep serum (Sigma-Aldrich) in tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris)-hydrogen chloride/NaCl buffer for 30 minutes at RT and successively in mouse antidigoxigenin (1 : 100 in Tris 1M; Roche) overnight at 4°C. After 3 washes of 5 minutes each in Tris 1M, sections were incubated in polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins (1 : 25 in Tris 1M; DAKO) for 30 minutes at RT and successively, after 3 washes of 5 minutes each in Tris 1M, with alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase mouse monoclonal (1 : 25 in Tris 1M; DAKO) for 30 minutes at RT. Sections were washed 3 x 5 minutes in Tris 1M and finally were stained with chromogenic substrate system for alkaline phosphatase (Liquid Permanent Red, DAKO) for 30 minutes, counterstained with methyl green, and mounted in Ultramount (DAKO).

Sections of chorion allantoic membrane (CAM) of HPAIV experimentally infected chicken embryos were used as positive controls. In addition, CAM of uninfected chicken embryos was introduced in each ISH reaction as a negative control.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Mortality and clinical signs

Intranasal and oral administration of HPAIV A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) resulted in the death of all 10 ducks. Clinical signs started at 2 dpi, with conjunctivitis and slight depression, and progressed over a period of 1–3 days to severe neurologic signs consisting of torticollis, incoordination, tremors, and seizures ( Table 1). Survival times varied from 3 to 7 dpi. Uninfected ducks appeared healthy throughout the period of clinical monitoring and were euthanized at 14 dpi.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table. 1. Clinical signs, histopathology, and results of IHC and ISH of ducks intranasally and orally inoculated with HPAIV A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1).

 
Gross pathology

At necropsy, mild lesions consisting of petechial hemorrhages in the duodenum, ceca, proventriculus, and ventriculus were observed in infected ducks. Congestion of the duodenal mucosa with hemorrhagic content was observed in 5 birds (50%). Hemorrhages of the pancreas (3/10, 30%) and trachea (2/10, 20%) were also present in some birds. No gross lesions were observed in negative controls.

Histopathology

Histologic lesions were mainly observed in the brain (6/10, 60%) and pancreas (4/10, 40%) of the ducks that developed clinical signs. Multifocal, moderate-to-severe necrosis of the neurons and glial cells ( Fig. 1) and occasional neuronophagia were observed in cerebral gray matter. Rarely, vessels showed multifocal perivascular cuffing, with lymphocytes and fewer histiocytes. No histologic lesions were observed in either the cerebellum or brain stem. In the pancreas, multifocal necrosis of the acinar cells was present ( Fig. 2), while no lesions of the islet cells were observed. In 5 ducks, histologic examination revealed sloughing of the epithelium of the upper part of the villi and rare foci of hemorrhages in the mucosa of the duodenum (5/5, 50%). No further lesions were detected among ceca, skeletal muscles, liver, the thoracic portion of trachea, and lung. No lesions were observed in the uninfected ducks.


Figure 01
View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Cerebrum; H5N1 experimentally infected duck. Discrete focus of necrosis and congestion. HE. Bar = 50 µm.
Fig. 2. Pancreas; H5N1 experimentally infected duck. Focal necrosis of the acinar pancreatic cells. HE. Bar = 100 µm.
Fig. 3. Cerebrum; H5N1 experimentally infected duck. Intranuclear and intracytoplasmic immunohistochemical staining for avian influenza virus (nucleoprotein in a limited number of cerebral neurons) ( Inset: Bar = 25 µm) and glial cells. EnVision AP (DAKO) with Mayer's hematoxylin counterstain. Bar = 50 µm.
Fig. 4. Pancreas; H5N1 experimentally infected duck. Intranuclear and intracytoplasmic staining for avian influenza virus nucleoprotein in necrotic acinar cells. EnVision AP (DAKO) with Mayer's hematoxylin counterstain. Bar = 100 µm.
Fig. 5. Cerebrum; H5N1 experimentally infected duck. Intranuclear and intracytoplasmic detection of viral nucleoprotein ribonucleic acid in cerebral neurons ( Inset: Bar = 25 µm) and glial cells. In situ hybridization. Methyl green counterstain. Bar = 100 µm.
Fig. 6. Submucosal duodenal plexus; H5N1 experimentally infected duck. Viral ribonucleic acid in the nucleus of nervous cells ( Inset: Bar = 25 µm). In situ hybridization. Methyl green counterstain. Bar = 50 µm.

 
IHC

Viral antigen was detected in the cerebrum, brain stem, and pancreas, mainly in association with histologic lesions. Intranuclear and intracytoplasmic staining was seen in neurons and glial cells ( Fig. 3) of the cerebral gray matter and brain stem in 8 of the infected ducks (8/10, 80%). In the pancreas, immunolabeling was detected in the nucleus and cytoplasm of necrotic acinar cells of 2 ducks (2/10, 20%) ( Fig. 4). No nucleoprotein antigen was detected in negative controls.

ISH

Viral RNA was detected in neurons and glial cells of the cerebral gray matter ( Fig. 5) and brain stem of all symptomatic ducks. Furthermore, positive staining was observed in cerebellar Purkinje neurons. The ISH-positive reaction was of stronger intensity and wider distribution than IHC immunolabeling in all the organs evaluated. Viral RNA was also observed in nervous cells of the submucosal plexus of the duodenum in 5 infected ducks (5/10, 50%) ( Fig. 6). In addition, ISH revealed viral RNA associated with necrotic cells of the pancreas of 2 ducks (2/10, 20%) and in epithelial cells of the bronchi of 1 duck (1/10, 10%). No immunolabeling was observed in negative controls. The results of histologic examination, IHC, and ISH are reported in Table 1.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Acknowledgements
 References
 
Waterfowl, the natural reservoir of all influenza A viruses, usually carry the infection without signs of disease.1,2,12,33,38 Most studies emphasize the ducks' resistance to disease development after experimental infection with H5N1 influenza virus.7,25 In the past 5 years, there have been more frequent reports of ducks developing severe disease, such as neurologic signs and mortality after infection with HPAI viruses during outbreaks.6,8 The H5N1 avian influenza viruses isolated in late 2002 in Hong Kong, which caused the first cases of lethal influenza virus infection reported in wild aquatic birds since 1961, were antigenically distinct from previously described H5N1 viruses and were neurotropic and pathogenic in ducks.30 For this reason, the relatively new phenomenon of viruses being pathogenic in their natural reservoir is intriguing, and there is considerable scientific interest in better understanding the pathogenesis of H5N1 viruses in ducks.

In the present study, intranasal and oral administration of HPAIV A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) resulted in high morbidity and mortality in Pekin ducks, within 7 dpi. Clinically, the affected ducks showed severe neurologic signs. Histopathology, IHC, and ISH demonstrated a marked neurotropism of the virus. Furthermore, pancreatic damage associated with virus replication was observed. Previous studies demonstrated that in those avian species susceptible either naturally or experimentally to selected HPAIVs, the virus tends to consistently localize to both the brain and the pancreas, with variable or minor lesions in other organs.19,20 Interestingly, although no clinical signs of disease were observed in DK/Anyang/AVL-1/01 high-pathogenicity H5N1 virus–inoculated ducks, infectious virus could be detected in lung tissue, cloacal, and oropharyngeal swabs. This virus was unique among the H5N1 isolates in that infectious virus and viral antigen could also be detected in brain and muscle tissue of ducks.34,35 The susceptibility of emus, domestic geese, domestic ducks, and pigeons to the experimental infection with the H5N1 HPAIV that emerged in Hong Kong in 1997 has been also investigated. Both emus and geese developed pancreatitis, meningoencephalitis, and mild myocarditis, and viral antigen was detected in affected organs by IHC. In contrast, viral infection in ducks was pneumotropic. Pigeons were resistant to viral infection.19 Among several other avian species, the brain was consistently affected, but microscopic lesions and viral antigen were also observed widely distributed in other organs.18,20,36

Our findings agree with those recorded in ducks and geese during the outbreak of H7N1 avian influenza virus, which occurred in Italy during 1999 and 2000. Mortality and nervous signs were recorded, and histologic examination revealed a limited number of necrotic foci of the acinar cells of the pancreas and mild lymphocytic encephalitis with perivascular cuffing. IHC positivity was observed in the pancreas and central nervous system (CNS) in both species.6 In a recent study, the susceptibility of experimentally infected pigeons to the HPAIV H5N1, associated with the neurotropism of the virus, was demonstrated.13 These studies indicate that there is a significant variation in the pathogenicity of H5N1 HPAIVs in avian species, even though the neurotropism is a recurrent feature among birds that eventually succumb to infection. Infections of the CNS with HPAIV of the subtype H5 have been observed also in a wide variety of mammalian species, particularly in mice22 and rats,4 but also in humans11 and feline species, including domestic cats23 and tigers,3 in ferrets39 as well as in dogs.28 However, it is important to note that these infections with H5 HPAIVs in mammalian species have largely been only successfully induced experimentally through selected routes of inoculation,22,23,39 as opposed to those in avian species that are both spontaneously and experimentally induced through a variety of routes.7–9,13,14,36

There is evidence for at least 2 routes of virus entry into the nervous system. It has been demonstrated that HPAIV replicates in endothelial cells during the early stage of infection in chickens, and virus spread in the body occurs following viremia.5,14,32 After penetrating the blood-brain barrier, infection is propagated to neurons and glial cells.27 A second route of CNS invasion has been demonstrated in experimentally infected mice, by ascending trans-synaptic transmission of H5N1 via vagal, olfactory, and trigeminal nerve fibers.16,17,29 In cats, a third route of entry from the intestinal lumen has been postulated. The submucosal and myenteric plexuses of the small intestine may have been infected directly from the intestinal lumen via nerve fibers projecting through the mucosa and interacting directly with surface epithelial cells.23 In our investigation, no viral genome was detected in endothelial cells. In contrast, viral RNA detection in nervous cells of the submucosal plexus was evident. However, since all the examined birds spontaneously succumbed to viral infection, no pathologic data about the early stages of the infection are available and no conclusion about the route of entry of the virus in the CNS can be drawn.

Influenza A viruses have generally been found to replicate preferentially in the intestinal epithelial cells of ducks.10,37 However, the newer H5N1 viruses are shed primarily from the upper respiratory tract.8,30 In our study, neither viral antigen nor viral RNA was detected in the epithelium of the intestinal tract. In addition, only 1 duck had a few bronchial epithelial cells positive for viral RNA by ISH, while all ducks that died with clinical symptoms were positive for virus in the CNS. These results could indicate that the immune-privileged nervous system is the preferred site of replication of the HPAIV A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) in ducks according to the time course of the infection and the sampling times of the study. Furthermore, neurotropism is likely to be the predominant factor in the production of morbidity and mortality relative to infection with this HPAIV virus in ducks. A recent study showed that the recent Asia-wide outbreak of H5N1 influenza was caused by a dominant H5N1 Z genotype.15,31 This homogeneity in virus genotype contrasts with the pathogenic potentials of the virus isolates, which ranged from nonpathogenic to lethal. Therefore, H5N1 pathogenicity in ducks does not correlate with genotypes and may be due to genetic traits more subtle than genotypes, such as an individual allogene or even just a few specific amino acids.31 A reverse genetic approach identified a single amino acid substitution, Glu-to-Lys at position 627 in the PB2 protein, which affects replicative efficiency but not cell tropism, of Hong Kong H5N1 influenza A viruses in mice.26 The molecular basis of the neurotropism of certain AI virus strains remains to be further elucidated.

Through the application of IHC, the localization of viral antigen was found to closely correlate to clinical manifestations of disease and the histologic lesions detected. In some samples, viral demonstration in necrotic pancreatic foci was not possible, presumably due to the extensive necrosis of affected cells. In contrast, both IHC and ISH were able to reveal viral infection in individual cells before the development of histologic lesions. ISH was more sensitive than IHC, revealing a small amount of viral RNA in some samples where viral nucleoprotein has not been detected by IHC. ISH has been previously applied in studying the AI pathogenesis and the cell tropism of the virus.9,16 This method, applied on paraffin-embedded sections, appears to be very useful in the study of the pathogenesis of the AI infection, particularly in the case of low viral-replication rates.

In conclusion, the pathologic findings of HPAIV A/Duck/Vietnam/12/05 (H5N1) have been investigated in experimentally infected Pekin ducks. The virus showed high pathogenicity, associated with marked CNS and pancreatic damage. IHC and ISH detected virus spread even in cells and tissues where histologic lesions were not present, showing the strong viral neurotropism in ducks.


   Acknowledgements
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
References
 
We acknowledge the skillful technical assistance of the personnel of the Virology Laboratory and of the Animal Care staff of the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie. We thank Alberto Masiero for assistance with photographs. Dr. David E. Swayne, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA, is gratefully acknowledged for providing the influenza A nucleoprotein monoclonal antibody. Dr. Ralph Wagner, Institut fuer Virologie, Philipps-Universitaet, Marburg, Germany, is gratefully acknowledged for providing the ISH probe, and Dr. Bjorn Keiner, for the information provided. The work has been financially supported by European Project AVIFLU QLRT-CT2001-01454.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Alexander DJ. A review of avian influenza in different bird species.Vet Microbiol 74:3 –13,2000[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Alexander DJ, Lister SA, Johnson MJ, Randall CJ, Thomas PJ. An outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in turkeys in Great Britain in 1991.Vet Rec 132:535 –536,1993[ISI][Medline]
  3. Amonsin A, Payungporn S, Theamboonlers A, Thanawongnuwech R, Suradhat S, Pariyothorn N, Tantilertcharoen R, Damrongwantanapokin S, Buranathai C, Chaisingh A, Songserm T, Poovorawan Y. Genetic characterization of H5N1 influenza A viruses isolated from zoo tigers in Thailand.Virology 344:480 –491,2006[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Brask Jo, Hill RH, Kristensson K. Changes in the calcium currents and GABAergic spontaneous activity in cultured rat hippocampal neurons after a neurotropic influenza A virus infection.Brain Res Bull 55:421 –429,2001[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Brown CC, Olander HJ, Senne DA. A pathogenesis study of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N2 in chickens, using immunohistochemistry.J Comp Pathol 107:341 –348,1992[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Capua I, Mutinelli F. Mortality in Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) and domestic geese (Anser anser var. domestica) associated with natural infection with a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of H7N1 subtype.Avian Pathol 30:179 –183,2001[CrossRef][ISI]
  7. Chen H, Deng G, Li Z, Tian G, Li Y, Jiao P, Zhang L, Liu Z, Webster RG, Yu K. The evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in ducks in southern China.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10452 –10457,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ellis TM, Bousfield B, Bisset L, Dyrting K, Luk GSM, Tsim ST, Sturm-Ramirez K, Webster RG, Guan Y, Peiris MJS. Investigation of outbreaks of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza in waterfowl and wild birds in Hong Kong in late 2002.Avian Pathol 33:492 –505,2004[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Feldmann A, Schafer MK-H, Gartner W, Klenk H-D. Targeted infection of endothelial cells by avian influenza virus A/FPV/Rostock/34 (H7N1) in chicken embryos.J Virol 74:8018 –8027,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hinshaw VS, Webster RG, Turner B. The perpetuation of orthomyxoviruses and paramyxoviruses in Canadian waterfowl.Can J Microbiol 26:622 –629,1980[ISI][Medline]
  11. Joseph T, Subbarao K. Humans infections with avian influenza A viruses.Md Med 6:30 –32,2005[Medline]
  12. Kawaoka Y, Chambers TM, Sladen WL, Webster RG. Is the gene pool of influenza viruses in shorebirds and gulls different from that in wild ducks?.Virology 162:247 –250,1988
  13. Klopfleisch R, Werner O, Mundt E, Harder T, Teifke JP. Neurotropism of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus A/Chicken/Indonesia/2003 (H5N1) in experimentally infected pigeons ( Columbia livia f. domestica).Vet Pathol 43:463 –470,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kobayashi Y, Horimota T, Kawaoka Y, Alexander DJ, Itakura C. Pathological studies of chickens experimentally infected with two highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses.Avian Pathol 25:285 –304,1996[Medline]
  15. Li KS, Guan Y, Wang J, Smith GJ, Xu KM, Duan L, Rahardjo AP, Puthavathana P, Buranathai C, Nguyen TD, Estoepangestie AT, Chaisingh A, Auewarakul P, Long HT, Hanh NT, Webby RJ, Poon LL, Chen H, Shortridge KF, Yuen KY, Webster RG, Peiris JS. Genesis of a highly pathogenic and potentially pandemic H5N1 influenza virus in eastern Asia.Nature 430:209 –213,2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Matsuda K, Park CH, Sunden Y, Kimura T, Ochiai K, Umemura T. The vagus nerve is one route of transneural invasion for intranasally inoculated influenza A virus in mice.Vet Pathol 41:101 –107,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Park CH, Ishinaka M, Takada A, Kida H, Kimura T, Ochiai K, Umemura T. The invasion routes of neurovirulent A/Hong Kong/483/97 (H5N1) influenza virus into the central nervous system after respiratory infection in mice.Arch Virol 147:1425 –1436,2002[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Perkins LE, Swayne DE. Pathobiology of A/chicken/Hong Kong/220/97 (H5N1) avian influenza virus in seven gallinaceous species.Vet Pathol 38:149 –164,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Perkins LE, Swayne DE. Pathogenicity of a Hong Kong-origin H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus for emus, geese, ducks, and pigeons.Avian Dis 40:53 –63,2002
  20. Perkins LE, Swayne DE. Varied pathogenicity of a Hong Kong-origin H5N1 avian influenza virus in four passerine species and budgerigars.Vet Pathol 40:14 –24,2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method for estimation fifty percent endpoints.Am J Hyg 27:493 –497,1938
  22. Reinacher M, Bonin J, Narayan O, Scholtissek C. Pathogenesis of neurovirulent influenza A virus infection in mice.Lab Invest 49:686 –692,1983[ISI][Medline]
  23. Rimmelzwaan GF, van Riel D, Baars M, Bestebroer TM, van Amerongen G, Fouchier RAM, Osterhaus ADME, Kuiken T. Influenza A virus (H5N1) infection in cats causes systemic disease with potential novel routes of virus spread within and between hosts.Am J Pathol 168:176 –183,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rott R. The pathogenic determinant of influenza virus.Vet Microbiol 33:303 –310,1992[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  25. Shortridge KF, Zhou NN, Guan Y, Gao P, Ito T, Kawaoka Y, Kodihalli S, Krauss S, Markwell D, Murti KG, Norwood M, Senne D, Sims L, Takada A, Webster RG. Characterization of avian H5N1 influenza viruses from poultry in Hong Kong.Virology 252:331 –342,1998[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Shinya K, Hamm S, Hatta M, Ito H, Ito T, Kawaoka Y. PB2 amino acid at position 627 affects replicative efficiency, but not cell tropism, of Hong Kong H5N1 influenza A viruses in mice.Virology 320:258 –266,2004[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Silvano FD, Yoshikawa M, Shimada A, Otsuki K, Umemura T. Enhanced neuropathogenicity of avian influenza A virus by passages through air sac and brain in chicks.J Vet Med Sci 59:143 –148,1997[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Songserm T, Amonsin A, Jam-on R, Sae-Heng N, Meemak N, Pariyothorn N, Payungporn S, Theamboonlers A, Poovorawan Y. Fatal avian influenza A H5N1 in a dog.Emerg Infect Dis 12:1744 –1747,2006[ISI][Medline]
  29. Starick E, Werner O. Detection of H7 avian influenza virus directly from poultry specimens.Avian Dis 47:521 –525,2003
  30. Sturm-Ramirez K, Ellis TM, Bousfield B, Bisset L, Dyrting K, Rehg JE, Poon L, Guan Y, Peiris MJS, Webster RG. Reemerging H5N1 influenza viruses in Hong Kong in 2002 are highly pathogenic to ducks.J Virol 78:4892 –4901,2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Sturm-Ramirez K, Hulse-Post DJ, Govorkova EA, Humberd J, Seiler P, Puthavathana P, Buranathai C, Nguyen TD, Chaisingh A, Long HT, Naipospos TSP, Chen H, Ellis TM, Guan Y, Peiris JSM, Webster RG. Are ducks contributing to the endemicity of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in Asia?.J Virol 79:11269 –11279,2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Suarez DL, Perdue ML, Cox N, Rowe T, Bender C, Huang J, Swayne DE. Comparison of highly virulent H5N1 influenza A viruses isolated from humans and chickens from Hong Kong.J Virol 72:6678 –6688,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Suss J, Schafer J, Sinnecker H, Webster RG. Influenza virus subtypes in aquatic birds of eastern Germany.Arch Virol 135:101 –114,1994[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  34. Tumpey TM, Suarez DL, Perkins LE, Senne DA, Lee JG, Lee YJ, Mo IP, Sung HW, Swayne D. Characterization of a highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza A virus isolated from duck meat.J Virol 76:6344 –6355,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Tumpey TM, Suarez DL, Perkins LE, Senne DA, Lee J, Lee YJ, Mo IP, Sung HW, Swayne DE. Evaluation of a high-pathogenicity H5N1 avian influenza A virus isolated from duck meat.Avian Dis 47:(Suppl 3)951 –955,2003[ISI][Medline]
  36. Tanimura N, Tsukamoto K, Okamatsu M, Mase M, Imada T, Nakamura K, Kubo M, Yamaguchi S, Irishio W, Hayashi M, Nakai T, Yamauchi A, Nishimura M, Imai K. Pathology of fatal highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus infection in large-billed crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) during the 2004 outbreak in Japan.Vet Pathol 43:500 –509,2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Webster RG, Yakhno M, Hinshaw VS, Bean WJ, Murti KG. Intestinal influenza: replication and characterization of influenza viruses in ducks.Virology 84:268 –278,1978[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  38. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses.Microbiol Rev 56:152 –179,1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Zitzow LA, Rowe T, Morken T, Shieh WJ, Zaki S, Katz JM. Pathogenesis of avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses in ferrets.J Virol 76:4420 –4429,2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Request reprints from Marta Vascellari, Histopathology Laboratory, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020 Legnaro (PD), (Italy). E-mail: mvascellari{at}izsvenezie.it





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vascellari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mutinelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vascellari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mutinelli, F.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS