Vet Pathol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Vet Pathol 44:963-964 (2007)
© 2007 American College of Veterinary Pathologists
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

Editor:

The hamster cheek pouch has been used to evaluate the effects of drugs and chemicals in the mistaken belief that it is an appropriate surrogate for determining the effect such agents would have on the gastrointestinal tract and orala cavity epithelium.1–8,10–12,12–27

aAn "oral" cavity does not communicate directly with the nasal cavity or eustachian tubes. A "buccal" cavity, seen in frogs and lower species, has a direct connection to the nasal cavity and eustachian tubes.

For several reasons the above assumption is not valid.9,13 Hamster cheek pouches are specialized structures lined with a relatively thick layer of surface keratin lying above cornified, stratified squamous epithelium: essentially like the epidermis, but lacking dendritic cells and adnexal structures such a mucousb glands. Hamster cheek pouch epithelium is similar to that of the tongue, gingiva and hard palate but lacks equal numbers of resident dendritic cells and secretary glands. Unkeratinized stratified squamous epithelium lines the remainder of the oral cavity. The keratinized, multiple-layered, pouch epithelium is resistant to abrasion and hinders absorption, allowing hamsters to store undigested food in the form of fruits, nuts, berries and insects in their pouches. Pouch adventitia is rather dense, lacking lymphatics and serving mainly to adhere the epithelium.

Mucosa lines some parts of the gastrointestinal tract. The single-layer of epithelium is columnar or low columnar and is interspersed with mucus-secreting and other glands. Surface mucus, for which the name is derived, provides protection against chemicals and acts as a lubricant. Mucosal surfaces of the gut are absorptive. In the small intestine, there are specialized delicate microvilli dedicated to this purpose. Mucosa contains Peyer’s patches and other immune surveillance such as intraepithelial lymphocytes. A rich system of nerves, blood, and lymph vessels underlies the epithelium supporting the secretary, absorptive and immune surveillance activity.

Given all of the above and perhaps most importantly the fact that the hamster cheek pouch is an immunologically protected site,9,17 use as a surrogate for the gastrointestinal and oral mucosa does not seem very compelling. Thinner areas of the epidermis with intact immunological surveillance and greater ease of access for evaluation may be a better choice as surrogates. Both sites unfortunately suffer the disadvantage of not being mucous membranes. Painful lesions in the skin do not interfere with food intake to the same extent as those in the cheek pouch– certainly an advantage of the skin site.

Julia H. Riley, MS

Diplomate American College Veterinary Pathologists

Diplomate American Board Toxicology

Footnotes

a An "oral" cavity does not communicate directly with the nasal cavity or eustachian tubes. A "buccal" cavity, seen in frogs and lower species, has a direct connection to the nasal cavity and eustachian tubes. Back

b Glands secreting mucus, a complex secretion containing inorganic material and organic materials such as proteins produced by transudation or secreted from plasma, glycoproteins and polysaccharides. Epithelial surfaces lining body cavities containing these glands are "mucous membranes." Back

References

  1. Alvarez E, Fey EG, Valax P, Yim Z, Peterson JD, Mesri M, Jeffers M, Dindinger M, Twomlow N, Ghatpande A, LaRochelle WJ, Sonis ST, Lichenstein HS. Preclinical characterization of CG53135 (FGF-20) in radiation and concomitant chemotherapy/radiation-induced oral mucositis. Clin Cancer Res 9:(9) 3454–61, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Berta GN, Di Carlo F, Bosio A, Corvetti G, Cesano L, Arzani C, Bailo M, Mognetti B, Bartorelli A, Ghezzo F. Effect of the single major proteic (sic) fractions of the liver perchloric extract UK101 on the development of oral tumours in Syrian hamsters. J Oral Pathol Med 30:(9) 532–6, 2001[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Bhide SV, Munir KM, Wiessler M, Sarode AV, Soman CS. Induction of oral mucosal tumors in hamsters and rats treated with methyl(acetoxymethyl)nitrosamine. J Natl Cancer Inst 73:(3) 737–41, 1984[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Bourrinet P, Conduzorgues JP, Dutertre H, Macabies J, Masson P, Maurin J, Mercier O. Interlaboratory study for the assessment of potential irritative properties of hygiene products on the hamster cheek pouch. Lab Anim Sci 45:(1) 36–40, 1995[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Casto BC, Kresty LA, Kraly CL, Pearl DK, Knobloch TJ, Schut HA, Stoner GD, Mallery SR, Weghorst CM. Chemoprevention of oral cancer by black raspberries. Anticancer Res 22:(6C) 4005–15, 2002[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Chang LC, Chou MY, Chow P, Matossian K, McBride J, Tao CA, Gallagher GT, Wong DT. Detection of transforming growth factor-alpha messenger RNA in normal and chemically transformed hamster oral epithelium by in situ hybridization. Cancer Res 49:(23) 6700–7, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Collet AM, Palmieri M, Molinari B, Schwint AE, Itoiz ME. Experimental study to test the potential tumor promotion effect of a tooth bleaching agent. Acta Odontol Latinoam 14:(1–2) 30–4, 2001[Medline]
  8. Craig GT, Franklin CD. The effect of turpentine on hamster cheek pouch mucosa: a model of epithelial hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis. J Oral Pathol 6:(5) 268–77, 1977[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. de Arruda MS, Montenegro MR. The hamster cheek pouch: an immunologically privileged site suitable to the study of granulomatous infections. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 37:(4) 303–9, 1995[Medline]
  10. Eveson JW. Animal models of intra-oral chemical carcinogenesis: a review. J Oral Pathol 10:(3) 129–46, 1981[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Garren KW, Topp EM, Repta AJ. Buccal absorption. III. Simultaneous diffusion and metabolism of an aminopeptidase substrate in the hamster cheek pouch. Pharm Res 6:(11) 966–70, 1989[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Glanzmann T, Forrer M, Blant SA, Woodtli A, Grosjean P, Braichotte D, van den Bergh H, Monnier P, Wagnieres G. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin in the hamster cheek pouch tumor model: comparison with clinical measurements. J Photochem Photobiol B 57:(1) 22–32, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ghoshal NG, Bal HS. Histomorphology of the hamster cheek pouch. Lab Anim. 24:(3) 228–33, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Harada K, Yura Y, Tsujimoto H, Kusaka J, Yoshida H, Sato M. Effect of local administration of epidermal growth factor on 9, 10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene-induced tumour formation in hamster cheek pouch. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 31B:(1) 27–31, 1995[Medline]
  15. Harsanyi BB, Foong WC, Howell RE, Hidi P, Jones DW. Hamster cheek-pouch testing of dental soft polymers. J Dent Res 70:(6) 991–6, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hassanin MB, Ashrafi SH. Comparative light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopic study of chemically induced premalignant lesions in hamster's cheek pouch. Ultrastruct Pathol 12:(3) 341–50, 1988[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Kaplan HJ, Streilein JW. Do immunologically privileged sites require a functioning spleen?. Nature 251:553–554, 1974[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Kreimann EL, Itoiz ME, Dagrosa A, Garavaglia R, Farias S, Batistoni D, Schwint AE. The hamster cheek pouch as a model of oral cancer for boron neutron capture therapy studies: selective delivery of boron by boronophenylalanine. Cancer Res 61:(24) 8775–81, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kurosaki Y, Aya N, Okada Y, Nakayama T, Kimura T. Studies on drug absorption from oral cavity: physicochemical factors affecting absorption from hamster cheek pouch. J Pharmacobiodyn 9:(3) 287–96, 1986[Medline]
  20. Lima V, Brito GA, Cunha FQ, Reboucas CG, Falcao BA, Augusto RF, Souza ML, Leitao BT, Ribeiro RA. Effects of the tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors pentoxifylline and thalidomide in short-term experimental oral mucositis in hamsters. Eur J Oral Sci 113:(3) 210–7, 2005[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Marshall MV, Cancro LP, Fischman SL. Hydrogen peroxide a review of its use in dentistry. J Periodontol 66:(9) 786–96, 1995[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Polavaram R, Fuentes CF, Shapshay SM, Wang Z. The role of laser vascular targeting and retinoic acid in oral cancer inhibition. Laryngoscope 113:(4) 715–9, 2003[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Roy M, Wishe HI. Establishment of an improved implantation technique for hamster mucous membrane irritation testing. J Dent Res 65:(11) 1365–70, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Tavakoli-Saberi MR, Audus KL. Cultured buccal epithelium: an in vitro model derived from the hamster pouch for studying drug transport and metabolism. Pharm Res 6:(2) 160–6, 1989[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Wang Z, Polavaram R, Fuentes CF, Shapshay SM. Topical chemoprevention of oral cancer with tretinoin "biofilm". Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:(8) 869–73, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wani MK, Yarber RH, Ahmed A, Hengesteg A, Robbins KT. Cancer induction in the DMBA hamster cheek pouch: a modified technique using a promoter. Laryngoscope 111:(2) 204–6, 2001[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Zhou H, Li B, Hu T. The mechanisms of antioxidant against inflammatory lesion in animal oral mucosa. II. A study of glutathione peroxidase]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 16:(1) 84–5, 88, 1998a[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS