Vet Pathol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woolford, L.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Woolford, L.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Vet Pathol 45:95-103 (2008)
© 2008 American College of Veterinary Pathologists
WILDLIFE, MARINE, AND ZOO ANIMALS

Cutaneous Papillomatosis and Carcinomatosis in the Western Barred Bandicoot (Perameles bougainville)

L. Woolford, A. J. O'Hara, M. D. Bennett, M. Slaven, R. Swan, J. A. Friend, A. Ducki, C. Sims, S. Hill, P. K. Nicholls and K. S. Warren

School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia (LW, AJO, MDB, MS, RS, AD, PKN, KSW), and Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, Australia (JAF, CS, SH)

Abstract

A progressive wart-like syndrome in both captive and wild populations of the Western barred bandicoot (WBB) is hindering conservation efforts to prevent the extinction of this endangered marsupial. In this study, 42 WBBs exhibiting the papillomatosis and carcinomatosis syndrome were examined. The disease was characterized by multicentric proliferative lesions involving cutaneous and mucosal surfaces, which were seen clinically to increase in size with time. Grossly and histologically the smaller skin lesions resembled papillomas, whereas the larger lesions were most commonly observed to be squamous cell carcinomas. Large amphophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies were observed in hyperplastic conjunctival lesions of 8 WBBs under light microscopy. Conjunctival lesions from 2 WBBs examined using transmission electron microscopy contained a crystalline array of spherical electron-dense particles of 45-nm diameter, within the nucleus of conjunctival epithelial cells, consistent with a papillomavirus or polyomavirus. Conjunctival samples from 3 bandicoots that contained intranuclear inclusion bodies also demonstrated a positive immunohistochemical reaction after indirect immunohistochemistry for papillomavirus structural antigens. Ultrastructural and/or immunohistochemical evidence of an etiologic agent was not identified in the nonconjunctival lesions examined. Here we describe the gross, histopathologic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical findings of a papillomatosis and carcinomatosis syndrome recently identified in the WBB.

Key words: Carcinomatosis; papillomatosis; papillomavirus; polyomavirus; Western barred bandicoot.

Infectious diseases have the potential to drive population declines and contribute to species extinction.14,15 The Western barred bandicoot (WBB), Perameles bougainville, is an endangered Australian marsupial that was once widespread across western and southern Australia. Now extinct on the mainland, wild populations are known only to exist on Bernier and Dorre Islands, in the World Heritage Area of Shark Bay Western Australia.37,41,42,49 Conservation efforts to prevent the extinction of this species are currently hampered by a progressively debilitating cutaneous and muco-cutaneous papillomatosis and carcinomatosis syndrome observed in both captive and wild WBBs. Affected animals develop multicentric papillomatous lesions, which appear clinically to progress to larger sizes. These lesions are extremely debilitating. Involvement of the feet, eyes, and mouth leads to problems with ambulation, vision, and eating. Affected animals often die due to secondary complications or are euthanatized on welfare grounds. Awareness of the papillomatosis syndrome first arose in 1999, when lesions were noticed developing on a captive adult female housed at Kanyana Wildlife Rehabilitation Center, Perth.48 Within a year, additional WBBs housed at the facility were noticed to have developed lesions. Similar cutaneous lesions were also noticed on captive WBBs at another breeding colony in Shark Bay and identified on wild WBBs on Bernier Island by the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in 2001. A historic trace back performed by one of the authors (SH) on 93 museum specimens from 5 museums in Australia found similar lesions to be present on Western Australian Museum WBB specimens dating back to 1982.22 The purpose of this report is to describe the gross, histologic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical features of a multicentric papillomatosis and carcinomatosis syndrome identified in 42 WBBs.

Materials and Methods

Study population

Between 2000 and 2006, submissions from 42 WBBs displaying focal or multifocal cutaneous and/or muco-cutaneous thickenings or masses were received by the pathology section at the Murdoch University School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences. Essential criteria for inclusion of WBBs in this study were epithelial lesions with gross and histologic characteristics consistent with either papilloma formation and/or squamous cell carcinomas, as classified by Goldschmidt et al. 1998.18 All animals in the study were sourced from captive populations of WBBs held at either Kanyana Wildlife Rehabilitation Center, Gooseberry Hill, Western Australia; Dryandra Field Breeding Center, near Narrogin, Western Australia; the Peron Captive Breeding Center, Shark Bay, Western Australia; or the Adelaide and Monarto Zoological Gardens, South Australia.

Submissions

Submissions consisted of either surgical biopsies collected into 10% neutral buffered formalin or entire deceased WBBs for postmortem examination. Entire animals submitted for postmortem were subjected to a complete postmortem examination; tissue samples were collected from skin lesions and all the major organ systems into 10% neutral buffered formalin. Samples from skin lesions were also trimmed to <3 mm in thickness and immersed in 5% glutaraldehyde for the purpose of transmission electron microscopy. Surgical biopsies and postmortem samples were formalin-fixed for at least 24 hours before processing for routine light microscopy.

Clinical records

Clinical records relating to skin disease onset and progression in cohort individuals were sourced from the aforementioned captive facilities as well as VetPath Diagnostic Laboratory Western Australia, the Western Australian Department of Agriculture and Food, and the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation.

Sample processing and evaluation

Tissues fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, collected as described above, were routinely processed for examination by light microscopy.4 After fixation for a minimum of 24 hours, tissues were trimmed to 5-mm-thick sections and placed into labeled cassettes. Sections were dehydrated through graded ethanol concentrations, cleared with xylene, and embedded with paraffin wax in a Leica EG 1150C automated processor (Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany). Tissue blocks were sectioned at 5 µm using a Leica 2135 microtome (Leica Microsystems). Slides were stained with Harris's hematoxylin and 1% eosin (HE), dehydrated, cleared, and mounted with a cover-slip using dibutyl phthalate pix xylene (DPX).

For ultrastructural examination using transmission electron microscopy, tissue sections were immersed in glutaraldehyde solution (5% vol/vol) for at least 24 hours prior to processing. For tissues fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, the formalin was removed and the tissue resuspended in Sorenson's buffer for a maximum of 30 minutes, following which the buffer was removed and discarded. This process was repeated 3 to 4 times. Tissues were then placed in glutaraldehyde solution (5% vol/vol). Tissues were postfixed in Dalton's chrome osmic acid (aqueous osmium tetroxide, potassium dichromate, aqueous sodium chloride), dehydrated in sequential ethanol concentrations, followed by treatment with propylene oxide and embedded in TAAB 812 epoxy resin. Sections were cut to 1 µm in thickness using a Reichart OM U3 ultramicrotome (Reichart, Vienna, Austria) and stained with 1% toluidine blue for examination by light microscopy to select appropriate resin-embedded tissue blocks for transmission electron microscopy. Ultrathin (90 nm) sections from selected blocks were cut onto grids, stained with lead citrate (0.1–0.4% wt/vol) and uranyl acetate (2% saturated aqueous wt/vol, pH 4.5), and examined using a transmission electron microscope (Philips CM100 BioTwin transmission electron microscope, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Tissue sections were then photographed (Kodak electron microscope film 4489, 6.5 x 9 cm, New Haven, CT).

Indirect immunohistochemistry using a polyclonal antibody recognizing conserved papillomavirus capsid antigens (rabbit anti-bovine papillomavirus [BPV-1], B0580, Dako Corporation, Carpinteria, CA)29 was performed on 5-µm paraffin sections according to a modified manufacturer's protocol. Sections from a known papillomavirus-infected canine oral papilloma were used as a positive control. In brief, 5-µm paraffin sections were deparaffinized in xylene. Sections were then subjected to antigen retrieval. The sections were placed in a pH 9 Tris-EDTA-sucrose (TES) buffer solution and microwaved twice on the reheat setting and twice on the low setting: each cycle was for 4 minutes. The sections were then cooled by a gradual addition of de-ionized water. Following cooling, the sections were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 minutes then washed with distilled water followed by pH 7.8 Tris/HCl-buffered washing solution. Sections were ringed with a wax pencil and treated with serum-free protein block (Dako Corp., X0909) for 10 minutes. Protein block was poured from the test slides without washing, and the primary antibody diluted 1 : 600 with Dako or Chemicon (Temecula, CA) antibody diluent was applied for 10 minutes. The negative control slides remained in the protein block for this 10-minute period. The slides were then washed in pH 7.8 Tris/HCl-buffered washing solution, and then treated with anti-rabbit antibody (ENVISION+, K4003, Dako Corp.) for 30 minutes. Following this step, they were treated with DAB+ substrate-chromogen system (K3468, Dako Corp.) solution for 3.5 minutes, changing the solution twice. Slides were counterstained with Harris's hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted with a cover-slip using DPX.

Results

Disease onset, duration, and age affected

The study cohort comprised 15 affected males and 25 affected females; the sex of 2 individuals was not recorded. The average age of onset of lesions was 3 years and 2 months of age (median, 3 years; range, 1 year to 5 years and 9 months). The time elapsed between the onset of skin lesions and euthanasia or death due to other causes averaged 1 year and 4.5 months (median, 1 year; range, 2 weeks to 4 years and 6 months). The average age at death of WBBs in the cohort was 4 years and 6 months (median, 4 years and 9 months; range, 2 years to 6 years and 6 months). The maximum life expectancy of WBB in captivity is estimated at 6 years of age, whereas in wild populations it is estimated at only 4 years of age (J. Butcher and N. Thomas, personal communication.) The age of 2 individuals was unknown as these animals were captured in the wild as adults.

Gross morphologic appearance and lesion distribution

The cutaneous and/or muco-cutaneous lesions in affected animals were variable in size and either solitary or multicentric. They ranged from regions of alopecia and small (1–2 mm in diameter and height) nodular papillomatous thickenings to large exophytic masses (>5 x 5 x 5  mm) often with an exudative crust or ulceration. Sites at which lesions were observed included skin of the digits (64% of study cohort); haired skin of the neck, thorax, and abdomen (55%); the periaural region (52%); and muco-cutaneous junctions of the lips (64%), conjunctiva (50%), and pouch/inguinal region (26%) (Figs. 1, 2). Within the cohort, 7 (16.7%) animals displayed a lesion at a single anatomic location only. The remaining 35 (83.3%) affected WBBs displayed lesions with a multicentric distribution.


Figure 01
View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Skin of the eyelids, lips, forelimbs, and digits; Western barred bandicoot. Demonstrates nodular and irregular papillomatous thickening.
Fig. 2. Ventral abdomen; Western barred bandicoot. Irregular papillomatous thickening of the dorsal skin of the hind digits and muco-cutaneous junctions of the pouch and cloacal opening. A large exophytic papillomatous mass is seen arising from the muco-cutaneous junction of the pouch.
Fig. 3. Conjunctival epithelium; Western barred bandicoot. Fig. 3A. Irregular hyperplasia of the mucosal epithelium. Multiple keratinocytes demonstrate margination of nuclear chromatin and central glassy amphophilic inclusions. Koilocytes are also evident. HE. Bar = 100 µm. Fig. 3B. Serial section of Fig. 3A. Immunohistochemical demonstration of papillomavirus structural antigens by use of rabbit polyclonal antibody developed from bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1). Hematoxylin counterstain. Bar = 100 µm.
Fig. 4. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; Western barred bandicoot. Islands of neoplastic epithelial cells containing central cores of keratin invade the dermis. Cells are closely apposed with intercellular desmosomes visible and have abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and basophilic staining nuclei with prominent and often multiple nucleoli. There is moderate to marked anisokaryosis and anisocytosis and mitotic figures are observed frequently. A mild neutrophilic infiltrate is seen in the subcutis and neoplastic epithelium. HE. Bar = 200 µm.

 
Histopathology of skin lesions

One hundred and seventeen skin and/or muco-cutaneous lesions were examined by light microscopy. Of these, 58 were classified as epithelial hyperplasia (49.6%), 30 as carcinoma in situ (25.6%), and 28 as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (23.9%). Adenocarcinoma of the pouch was recorded in one WBB.

There were 35 WBBs in the study cohort with multicentric lesions. Purely multicentric hyperplastic epithelial lesions were seen in 11 WBBs (31.4%), entirely malignant lesions were seen in 9 WBBs (25.7%), and both malignant and benign lesions were seen concurrently in 15 WBBs (42.8%). Solitary lesions were seen in 7 animals and consisted of either epithelial hyperplasia (4/7) or SCC (3/7); they were seen on the oral mucosa (3/7), the digital skin (3/7), or the haired skin of the body (1/7).

Thirty WBBs displayed 1 or more lesions classified as epithelial hyperplasia (n = 58). These lesions were characterized by mild, moderate, or marked irregular hyperplasia of the stratifying epithelium. The hyperplasia was attributable to an increase in the number of suprabasilar epithelial cells at mucosal sites and an increase in the number of keratinocytes within both the stratum spinosum and stratum granulosum of the epidermis. Hyperplasia of the outer root sheath of hair follicles, and the glandular elements of sebaceous and sweat glands, was also seen. Koilocytes and epithelial cells with marginated nuclear chromatin and large amphophilic inclusions (Fig. 3A) were evident in 8 cases with hyperplastic conjunctival lesions (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table. 1 Distribution and histopathological classification of cutaneous and mucosal lesions seen in the Western barred bandicoot(WBB).

 
Lesions categorized as carcinoma in situ (n = 30) were seen in 17 individuals. These lesions showed an expansion of the stratum spinosum and stratum granulosum and mild to moderate dysplastic changes in keratinocyte morphology and epidermal architecture, such as disturbed polarity of keratinocyte differentiation and suprabasilar mitoses. Individual cellular characteristics included hyperchromasia of nuclei, prominent nucleoli, clear or vacuolated cytoplasm, and mild anisocytosis and anisokaryosis. In 1 conjunctival lesion classified as carcinoma in situ, the nuclei of some keratinocytes in the stratum granulosum displayed margination of nuclear chromatin and large amphophilic inclusions.

Lesions categorized as SCC (n = 28) were located at cutaneous and muco-cutaneous sites in 20 individuals (Fig. 4). Histologically, the carcinomas consisted of invasive cords, islands, and trabeculae of neoplastic epithelial cells showing varying degrees of differentiation. In well-differentiated tumors, there was formation of keratin "pearls" circumscribed by neoplastic keratinocytes. The neoplastic epithelium extended into the dermis, with or without association with the overlying epidermis. The neoplastic cells themselves showed abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with distinct cell borders, intercellular desmosomes, and varying degrees of anisocytosis and anisokaryosis. Nuclei were often large, ovoid, and vesicular with prominent nucleoli. The squamous cell carcinomas were locally aggressive, invading into the surrounding dermis, subcutis, and even bone (n = 1). Inflammatory infiltrates were frequently observed within SCCs or in the surrounding subcutis, comprising neutrophilic, histiocytic, lymphoplasmacytic, or mixed cellular populations. In 3 animals in this study with cutaneous and muco-cutaneous SCC, metastases were observed in a lymph node (n = 1) and the lungs (n = 2).

The distribution and histologic classification of lesions according to their anatomic site is detailed in Table 1. SCCs were seen most commonly over the haired skin of the thorax and abdomen and in the periaural region. Adenocarcinoma of the pouch mammary glands was observed in 1 female affected by papillomatous and carcinomatous lesions at other anatomic sites. Conjunctival lesions were least frequently observed to undergo malignant transformation, with only 2/21 lesions designated carcinoma in situ and no cases of SCC observed at this site. However, these lesions exclusively displayed hyperplastic epithelium (n = 8) or carcinoma in situ (n = 1) in which keratinocytes demonstrated nuclear chromatin margination and amphophilic intranuclear inclusions.

Ultrastructural examination of skin lesions

Ultrathin sections from a range of hyperplastic and malignant lesions from 11 WBBs were examined by transmission electron microscopy. Two hyperplastic conjunctival lesions from 2 individuals that displayed keratinocyte intranuclear inclusions visible on the toluidine-blue-stained slides displayed a crystalline array of spherical electron dense particles, approximately 45 nm in diameter (Fig. 5), within keratinocyte nuclei. The morphology and size of these particles were consistent with that of a papillomavirus or a polyomavirus.


Figure 02
View larger version (184K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Conjunctival keratinocyte nuclei; Western barred bandicoot. Crystalline array of spherical electron dense virus-like particles ~45 nm in diameter seen within hyperplastic keratinocyte nuclei. Bar = 500 nm.

 
Immunohistochemistry

Indirect immunohistochemistry using a polyclonal antibody against BPV-1 (Dako Corporation) was performed on skin lesions from 14 individuals. Positive staining was observed in conjunctival epithelial lesions from 3 WBBs in which keratinocytes displayed margination of nuclear chromatin and large glassy amphophilic inclusions (Fig. 3B).

Discussion

This report describes the pathologic features of a recently recognized papillomatosis and carcinomatosis syndrome in 42 WBBs. The spectrum of cutaneous and muco-cutaneous lesions recorded resembles the stepwise progression of epithelia from premalignant stages into invasive squamous cell carcinomas. A single case of adenocarcinoma of the pouch mucosa was observed; however, the significance of this tumor in relation to the otherwise exclusively squamous carcinomatosis syndrome is still unclear. This disease occurs in adult individuals, lesions increase in size with age, and malignant transformation occurs in those lesions >5 x 5 x 5 mm. The discernable stages of lesion development and the progression in lesion size and malignancy seen with increasing age is consistent with a multistage model of carcinogenesis, reflecting the acquisition of genetic alterations by tumor cells driving progressive transformation into highly malignant derivatives.21,53

The development of malignancy involves complex interactions between several factors, both exogenous (environmental) and endogenous (genetic, hormonal, immunologic).53 Certain viruses are known to play key roles in carcinogenesis in humans and various animal species.23 Gross and histopathologic features of the skin and mucosal lesions combined with the ultrastructural and immunohistochemical features of conjunctival lesions in affected WBBs in this study are supportive of the involvement of either a papillomavirus, or less probably a polyomavirus, in the pathogenesis of this disease. In addition, the observation of skin lesion development in seemingly healthy, wild WBBs introduced into captive colonies of WBBs affected with the skin lesions provides further support that the syndrome may be caused by an infectious agent. Fight wounds and incidental trauma including loss of tails, ears, and eyes have been observed by the authors in both captive and wild WBBs. These incidents may facilitate the entry of an epitheliotropic agent such as a papillomavirus or polyomavirus, and thus it must be considered that a multicentric lesion distribution may be related to sites of epithelial trauma. Alternatively, the multicentric distribution of lesions may have arisen secondary to autoinoculation or perhaps viremia as has been alluded to in other species infected with papilloma- or polyomaviruses.2,3,6,17,40

In general, papillomaviruses are species specific and induce excessive irregular proliferation of cutaneous and mucosal epithelia in both humans and a range of animal species.46,54 Over 100 papillomavirus types have been completely characterized in humans alone.16 Cutaneous papillomatosis is not always associated with papillomavirus infection, however, with a range of infectious as well as noninfectious agents also recognized to induce proliferative and papillomatous lesions in animal species.46

Despite often appearing early in the course of disease (author observation, L. Woolford) and an increase in lesion size seen clinically, conjunctival lesions were least frequently observed to undergo malignant transformation. In addition, all lesions that demonstrated ultrastructural (n = 2) or immunohistochemical evidence (n = 3) of papillomavirus virions were derived from the conjunctiva only. Nonconjunctival lesions examined in this study may have lacked ultrastructural and immunohistochemical evidence for papillomavirus infection due to being intermittently infected, a condition described in papillomavirus-induced lesions in other species.44 Alternatively, nonconjunctival lesions may have lacked evidence of virions if sampled early in the course of development. Experimental infections in other species have shown that lesions do not express the capsid antigen (L1) until 7 weeks or more after infection. Consequently, early proliferative lesions often prove negative by immunohistochemistry for L1 capsid antigens and do not contain viral particles on ultrastructural examination.32 Furthermore, epithelia undergoing malignant transformation in association with papillomavirus infection may be negative for structural antigens by immunohistochemistry and be unremarkable on ultrastructural examination if viral DNA has become integrated into the host genome, leading to a nonproductive infection. Integration of papillomavirus DNA into host genomic DNA has been well documented in malignant lesions associated with high risk human papillomavirus infections.12,24,26,27,36

The development of malignancy involves a complex interaction between both exogenous and endogenous factors. Indeed the outcome of a papillomavirus infection and the role of the virus in carcinogenesis may be influenced by factors such as the virulence of the particular papillomavirus type,8,43,45,54 compromise of the host immune system,7,33,34 host genetics,1,9,20,30,51 and the presence of various chemical cofactors.10,25,38 Immunodeficiency and/or immunocompromise in the WBB are considered as potential risk factors for development of this disease. Assessment of immunocompetence in the WBB and the factors by which it may be influenced are being investigated concurrently by the authors. An increased incidence of papillomavirus-related disease is being reported in other endangered animal populations6,28 with decreases in genetic diversity a proposed cause of increased susceptibility to disease agents in some endangered species.47 In attempts to elucidate the pathogenesis of this disease in the WBB, it must be considered that a complex interaction between viral and other factors may be driving the development of malignant epithelial tumors.

Immunohistochemical staining of WBB conjunctival lesions in this study led us to consider the involvement of a papillomavirus in the pathogenesis of this disease. However, we did not feel we could rule out the involvement of a polyomavirus on the basis of immunohistochemical results alone. Significant antigen retrieval techniques were required to demonstrate papillomavirus structural antigens, which in the authors' experience have not been required for papillomavirus-associated epithelial lesions from other species using an otherwise identical technique. In addition, gross, histologic, and ultrastructural features of lesions did not discount a polyomavirus as an alternative etiologic agent. The mammalian polyomaviruses display a narrow host range and do not productively infect other species, typically causing apathogenic subclinical natural infections in immunocompetent hosts. These viruses may cause severe disease in the immunocompromised host or can cause tumor formation when they are introduced into an unnatural host.11,31 The hyperplastic changes seen affecting the root sheath epithelium in WBB lesions from areas of haired skin was reminiscent of the appearance of polyomavirus-associated trichoepitheliomas seen in hamsters.19 These tumors of hamsters occur primarily on the skin of the head, chin, neck, back, and frequently around the eyes and external ears; histologically they demonstrate proliferation of the hair root epithelium, forming cyst-like masses filled with cornified material.39 Definitive evidence to support or refute the presence of a specific etiologic agent in this syndrome is also lacking at this stage of investigations as nonconjunctival epithelial lesions did not demonstrate intranuclear inclusion bodies nor ultrastructural or immunohistochemical evidence of viral infection.

The papillomatosis and carcinomatosis syndrome observed in the Western barred bandicoot is a novel and emerging disease in this species and, to the authors' knowledge, is unlike skin diseases of Australian marsupials previously documented. No specific skin diseases of Australian bandicoot species have been documented to date; however, a conjunctivitis syndrome has been seen in captive and wild WBBs associated with novel Chlamydiales sp. isolated from the conjunctiva.5,52 Papillomatous lesions have been described in a common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpeca) in association with a papillomavirus infection, this being the only papillomavirus-associated lesions documented in an Australian marsupial to the authors' knowledge.35 Papillomatous lesions have also been recorded in a North American opossum (Didelphis virginiana) associated with a papillomavirus.46

Captive breeding and reintroduction programs form the basis of many animal species conservation efforts, and vigilance must be maintained for the emergence of new diseases: these form a major threat to biodiversity and have been shown to undermine the success of breeding and reintroduction programs.13–15,50 The papillomatosis and carcinomatosis syndrome in captive and wild WBBs is a pertinent example of disease threatening the survival of a species. Future investigations into the papillomatosis and carcinomatosis syndrome of the Western barred bandicoot will involve pursuing detection of an etiologic or contributing viral agent using molecular techniques, studying the transmissibility of the disease, and examining the patterns of disease in wild and captive populations to enable further elucidation of the pathogenesis of this novel and debilitating disease.

Acknowledgements

We thank Gerald Spoelstra of the Murdoch University histopathology laboratory for his skillful production of histology slides, and James Poynton for his technical assistance in the Murdoch University necropsy suite. We are grateful to June Butcher and the volunteers at Kanyana Wildlife Rehabilitation Center for their care and monitoring of the Western barred bandicoots housed there, and the Denham and Narrogin Department of Environment and Conservation Western Australia (DEC) officers for the care and monitoring of Western barred bandicoots in the Peron and Dryandra captive breeding facilities, respectively. This project is funded by the Australian Research Council in partnership with Murdoch University and the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) under Linkage Project LP0455050. Lucy Woolford is funded by the Lorna Edith Murdoch Veterinary Trust Scholarship.

References

  1. Apple RJ, Erlich HA, Klitz W, Manos MM, Becker TM, Wheeler CM. HLA DR–DQ associations with cervical carcinoma show papillomavirus–type specificity. Nat Genet 6:157–162, 1994[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Armbruster-Moraes E, Ioshimoto LM, Leao E, Zugaib M. Possible prodromes of human papillomavirus uterine cervix infection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 42:269–271, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Azzi A, De Santis R, Ciappi S, Leoncini F, Sterrantino G, Marino N, Mazzotta F, Laszlo D, Fanci R, Bosi A. Human polyomaviruses DNA detection in peripheral blood leukocytes from immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. J Neurovirol 2:411–416, 1996[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Bancroft JD, Stevens A. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques Churchill Livingstone, London, UK. 1982
  5. Bodetti TJ, Viggers K, Warren K, Swan R, Conaghty S, Sims C, Timms P. Wide range of Chlamydiales types detected in native Australian mammals. Vet Microbiol 96:177–187, 2003[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Bossart GD, Ewing RY, Lowe M, Sweat M, Decker SJ, Walsh CJ, Ghim S, Jenson AB. Viral papillomatosis in Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Exp Mol Path 72:37–48, 2002[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Bouwes Bavinck JN, Berkhout RJM. HPV infections and immunosuppression. Clin Dermatol 15:427–437, 1997[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Brandsma J. Animal models of human-papillomavirus-associated oncogenesis. Intervirology 37:189–200, 1994[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Breitburd F, Salmon J, Orth G. The rabbit viral skin papillomas and carcinomas: a model for the immunogenetics of HPV-associated carcinogenesis. Clin Dermatol 15:237–247, 1997[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Clarke EA, Morgan RW, Newman AM. Smoking as a risk factor in cancer of the cervix: additional evidence from a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 115:59–66, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cole CN, Conzen SD. Polyomaviridae: The Viruses and Their Replication. In: Field's Virology Knipe DM, Howley PM, eds. 4th ed., 2141–2174,Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. 2001
  12. Cullen AP, Reid R, Campion M, Lorincz AT. Analysis of the physical state of different human papillomavirus DNAs in intraepithelial and invasive cervical neoplasm. J Virol 65:606–612, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cunningham AA. Disease risks of wildlife translocations. Conserv Biol 10:349–353, 1996[CrossRef]
  14. Daszak P, Cunningham AA. Extinction by infection. Trends Ecol Evol 14:279, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife—threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287:443–449, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. de Villiers E, Fauquet C, Broker TR, Bernard H, zur Hausen H. Classification of papillomaviruses. Virology 324:17–27, 2004[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Dubois V, Dutronc H, Lafon ME, Poinsot V, Pellegrin JL, Ragnaud JM, Ferrer AM, Fleury HJ. Latency and reactivation of JC virus in peripheral blood of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients. J Clin Microbiol 35:2288–2292, 1997[Abstract]
  18. Goldschmidt MH, Dunstan RW, Stannard AA, von Tscharner C, Walder EJ, Yager JA. Histological Classification of Epithelial and Melanocytic Tumors of the Skin, 2nd series ed., vol. 3 17–19,Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC. 1998
  19. Graffi A, Schramm T, Graffi I, Bierwolf D, Bender E. Virus associated skin tumors of the Syrian hamster: preliminary note. J Natl Cancer Inst 40:867–873, 1968[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Han R, Breitburd F, Marche PN, Orth G. Linkage of regression and malignant conversion of rabbit papillomas to MHC class II genes. Nature 356:66–68, 1992[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57–70, 2000[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Hill SJE. Historical occurrence of a wart-like syndrome affecting western barred bandicoots. Newsletter of the Australian Mammal Society October:40, 2005
  23. Howely PM. Viral carcinogenesis. In: The Molecular Basis of Cancer Mendelsohn J, Howely PM, Israel MA, Liotta LA, eds. 38–58,WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. 1995
  24. Hudelist G, Manavi M, Pischinger KID, Watkins-Riedel T, Singer CF, Kubista E, Czerwenka KF. Physical state and expression of HPV DNA in benign and dysplastic cervical tissue: different levels of viral integration are correlated with lesion grade. Gynaecol Oncol 92:873–880, 2003[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  25. Jarrett WF, McNeil PE, Grimshaw WTR, Selman IE, McIntyre WIM. High incidence area of cattle cancer with a possible interaction between an environmental carcinogen and a papillomavirus. Nature 274:215–217, 1978[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Jeon S, Allen-Hoffmann BL, Lambert PF. Integration of human papillomavirus type 16 into the human genome correlates with a selective growth advantage of cells. J Virol 69:2989–2997, 1995[Abstract]
  27. Jeon S, Lambert PF. Integration of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA into the human genome leads to increased stability of E6 and E7 mRNAs: implications for cervical carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:1654–1658, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Joslin JO, Garner M, Collins D, Kamaka E, Sinabaldi K, Meleo K, Montali R, Sundberg JP, Jenson AB, Ghim S, Davidow B, Hargis AM, West K, Clark T, Haines D. Viral papilloma and squamous cell carcinomas in snow leopards (Uncia uncia). Proc American Association of 200 Veterinarians/International Association for Aquatic Animal Medicine (AAZV/IAAAM) Conf pp. 155–158, 2000
  29. Kurman RJ, Jenson AB, Sinclair CF, Lancaster WD. Detection of human papillomaviruses by immunocytochemistry. In: Advances in immunohistochemistry DeLellis RA, ed. 201–221,Masson Publishing, New York, NY. 1984
  30. Majewski S, Jablonska S, Orth G. Epidermodysplasia verruciformis. Immunological and nonimmunological surveillance mechanisms: role in tumor progression. Clin Dermatol 15:312–334, 1997
  31. Major EO. Human polyomavirus. In: Field's Virology Knipe DM, Howley PM, eds. 4th ed., 2175–2196,Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. 2001
  32. Nicholls PK, Doorbar J, Moore RA, Peh WL, Anderson DM, Stanley MA. Detection of viral DNA and E4 protein in basal keratinocytes of experimental canine oral papillomavirus lesions. Virology 284:82–98, 2001[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Nicholls PK, Klaunberg BA, Moore RA, Santos EB, Parry NR, Gough GW, Stanley MA. Naturally occurring, nonregressing canine oral papillomavirus infection: host immunity, virus characterisation, and experimental infection. Virology 265:365–374, 1999[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Palefsky JM. Human papillomavirus infection and anogenital neoplasia in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men and women. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 23:15–20, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Perrott MRF, Meers J, Greening GE, Farmer SE, Lugton IW, Wilks CR. A new papillomavirus of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) associated with typical wart-like lesions. Arch Virol 145:1247–1255, 2000[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Pirami L, Giache V, Becciolini A. Analysis of HPV16, 18, 31 and 35 DNA in pre-invasive and invasive lesions of the uterine cervix. J Clin Path 50:600–604, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Richards JD, Short J. Reintroduction and establishment of the western barred bandicoot Perameles bougainville (Marsupialia : Peramelidae) at Shark bay, Western Australia. Biol Conserv 109:181–195, 2003[CrossRef]
  38. Rous P, Kidd JG, Smith WE. Experiments on the cause of the rabbit carcinomas derived from virus-induced papillomas. J Exp Med 96:159–174, 1953[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  39. Scherneck S, Ulrich R, Feunteun F. The Hamster Polyomavirus: a brief review of recent knowledge. Viral Genes 21:93–101, 2001
  40. Scinicariello F, Sato T, Lee CS, Hsu HC, Chan TS, Tyring SK. Detection of human papillomavirus in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res 12:763–766, 1992[Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Seebeck JH, Brown PR, Wallis RL, Kemper CM. Bandicoots and Bilbies Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, New South Wales, Australia. 1990
  42. Short J, Turner B, Majors C, Leone J. The fluctuating abundance of endangered mammals on Bernier and Dorre Islands, Western Australia—conservation implications. Aust Mammol 20:53–61, 1997
  43. Stanley MA, Masterson PJ, Nicholls PK. In vitro and animal models for antiviral therapy in papillomavirus infections. Antivir Chem Chemother 8:381–400, 1997[Web of Science]
  44. Sundberg JP, Chiodini RJ, Nielsen SW. Transmission of the white-tailed deer cutaneous fibroma. Am J Vet Res 46:1150–1154, 1985[Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Sundberg JP, O'Banion MK, Shima A, Knupp C, Reichmann ME. Papillomas and carcinomas associated with a papillomavirus in European harvest mice (Micromys minutus). Vet Pathol 25:356–361, 1998
  46. Sundberg JP, Van Ranst M, Burk RD, Jenson AB. The nonhuman (animal) papillomaviruses: host range, epitope conservation, and molecular diversity. In: Human Papillomavirus Infections in Dermatovenereology Gross G, von Krogh G, eds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 1997
  47. Tachezy R, Rector A, Havelkova M, Wollants E, Fiten P, Opdenakker G, Jenson AB, Sundberg JP, Van Ranst M. Avian papillomaviruses: the parrot Psittacus erithacus papillomavirus (PePV) genome has a unique organisation of the early protein region and is phylogenetically related to the chaffinch papillomavirus. BMC Microbiol 2:1–9, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Thomas N, Friend T. The western barred bandicoot: warts and all!. Landscope 19:49–56, 2003
  49. UNESCO. World Heritage Committee. Fifteenth session. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage Carthage, Tunisia. 1991
  50. Viggers K, Lindenmayer DB, Spratt DM. The importance of disease in reintroduction programmes. Wildl Res 20:697–698, 1993
  51. Wank R, Thomssen C. High risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix for women with HLA-DQw3. Nature 352:723–725, 1991[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Warren K, Swan R, Bodetti TJ, Friend T, Hill S, Timms P. Ocular chlamydiales infections of western barred bandicoots (Perameles bougainville) in Western Australia. J Zoo and Wildl Med 36:100–102, 2005[CrossRef]
  53. Weinstein IB, Carothers AM, Santella RM, Perera FP. Molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis and multistage carcinogenesis. In: The Molecular Basis of Cancer Mendelsohn J, Howely PM, Israel MA, Liotta LA, eds. 59–85,WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. 1995
  54. zur Hausen H. Papillomavirus infections—a major cause of human cancers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1288:55–78, 1996
Dr. L Woolford, Department of Veterinary Pathology, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, WA 6150 (Australia). E-mail: l.woolford{at}murdoch.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 jvdiHome page
M. D. Bennett, L. Woolford, P. K. Nicholls, K. S. Warren, and A. J. O'Hara
Hepatic intranuclear glycogen inclusions in western barred bandicoots (Perameles bougainville)
J Vet Diagn Invest, May 1, 2008; 20(3): 376 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woolford, L.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Woolford, L.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS